List Mgmt. 2023 List Management

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Those draft watchers, be interested to know of the players on our list how many were drafted with concerns around their kicking?
 
You can blame it on getting:

McGovern
Williams
Martin

And inexplicably offering longer term deals for guys like Dow(at least his ends this year) and even LOB is contracted for 2024. Fisher for 2025. Wtf are we offering these longer deals for guys who no one else would want?

Genuine question, was Silvagni responsible for bringing all three of those across ?
 
I'm with you on that, i think we need a mini rebuild, gotta do some aggressive trading. Over the next 2 years or so id go with this from your list.

1.Lob delist seen enough
2.Mcgov wait and see, if he continues playing ok, maybe offer a year
3.Dow trade if possible or delist
4.Fisher trade for sure has some currency
5.Kennedy/hewitt, keep hewitt trade kennedy, he would probably net us a decent draft pick
6.Ed delist
7.Martin trade/delist
8.Marchbank delist
9 Cunners would be the first one on my list to delist
10.Tdk/pitto potentially trade tdk if good offer or whatever otherwise keep both
11.Acres keep
12.Williams give him to end of next year. If same same then delist/trade
13.Plowman delist
14.Honey delist
15 Philp delist
16.Mirkov dont know much about tbh. Delist i guess
17.Sos/kemp sos is a solid foot soldier, need them in ur team. Kemp id keep give him more time, he seems like hes improving.
Dow has no trade currency.
Fisher would be a late 2nd at best
Kennedy early 3rd
Martin 4th round
TDK, pick 10-20 with change
Williams - 3rd round

IMO these are the likely picks we could hope to secure for these players.... Every other club watches our games too, and the things we dont like about these players they are also well aware of and are not overpaying for our scraps.. Which of these players, all except Dow when fit are best 22 do you want to trade that we can replace with something better with these picks?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

People have been saying they are happy for TDK or Pitto to go at seasons end, does that mean you're happy to go into next season with just Pittonet, with Mirkov/Lemmey as the back up? Given our salary cap squeeze, won't be a lot of coin to chase an established ruck so who are we bringing in that could immediately improve us?
Basically at the moment it seems if we keep TDK we have to overpay his "worth" and he'll be hanging on till free agency then hike himself up, we keep Pitto he's a reasonable ruckman but can he sustain a full season is a wait and see. Like Pitto find a back up ruckman... recruit a Goldy for a 2 year contract as support (should've done that last year when he was a chance to be snapped up) and to play 12-15+ games... or find another young ruckman at 22-24 not getting much of a go in AFL/VFL wherever.

Overall my post was a view of what we can to free our list of players whom are worth some currency, we have seen enough of in our team and worth delisting or could refresh themselves elsewhere, or we might trade now to get some currency in order to give them a chance to be a starting 22 player in another team before we lose them for nothing anyway.

If we can bring in 6 fresh top 40 kids at this years draft and another 3-5 next season, top up with some mature seasoned players or speculative kids that fill a need the hope if that in 5 years when Tassie arrives hopefully 5-6 of those kids come good are about 22-24 years old with 50+ games under their belt then we have Walsh, Cerra, Harry, Charlie, Weitering, Motlops, etc potentially still around.

Voss and Co. come end of season will have had 2 full seasons and a reasonably "known" history of the list prior to Voss. If we continue to play out the season as we are at present then the data suggests it's time to be bold at trade, recruitment and list management, stop hoping they'll come good or miraculously be free from constant injuries as how many coaches and fitness staff have tried and failed.
 
I'm with you. Rebuild the list as quickly as possible. Not getting 3-4 players per year like we've been doing, it's a waste of time.
We have 2 Coleman medalist, 2 number 1 draft pick players, and a Brownlow medalist. Build a list around them. We have no time.
And most of our problems seem to stem from those guys.

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Not sure where the Setterfield hype is coming from...

Setterfield is having a Career best year for * and his output is still even/less than Hewett, who we'd all agree is out of form this year...

Good list management decision for me...


Not really a good comparison considering the knock on Hewett isn’t due to him not finding the ball, it’s that he’s having little to no impact and hes getting pointless possessions.

Hewett averaging 160 meters gained to Setterfields 370.

Hewett a few games ago had 26 possessions for 60M gained, it’s not good.
 
Can we please raise the intelligence level here just a tad.

In regards to Williams and Hewett.

They are both free agents, their contracts are included in our salary cap until they expire, even if we trade them.

Someone suggest delist Williams, sure delist a guy on $800,000 with 3 years left on his contract.

be better.
 
Can we please raise the intelligence level here just a tad.

In regards to Williams and Hewett.

They are both free agents, their contracts are included in our salary cap until they expire, even if we trade them.

Someone suggest delist Williams, sure delist a guy on $800,000 with 3 years left on his contract.

be better.
The difference in their contracts our included in our salary cap... we don't know if we've also forward paid either... so if they get traded we only pay the differential on our cap.
 
Can we please raise the intelligence level here just a tad.

In regards to Williams and Hewett.

They are both free agents, their contracts are included in our salary cap until they expire, even if we trade them.

Someone suggest delist Williams, sure delist a guy on $800,000 with 3 years left on his contract.

be better.

Not true. If we trade them their original salary would not get included in our cap. That would make 0 sense.

If we trade them they would need to agree on a salary with the new club. Only if the new club is unwilling to match their current wages and the player is unwilling to take a pay cut would we be forced to make up the difference and that would be included in our cap (just like any contracted player trade).

The only thing we can't do is get them to agree to a pay cut on their existing deal while staying with us. We could give them extra years at a low wage to smooth out the total amount paid to them but their would be risks in that given they will be into 30s when their current contracts expire.

I still cant see us trading them personally. Hewetts contract is good value and not a problem. Williams would be hard to find takers for without us chipping in a fair bit of his contract.
 
Last edited:
Basically at the moment it seems if we keep TDK we have to overpay his "worth" and he'll be hanging on till free agency then hike himself up, we keep Pitto he's a reasonable ruckman but can he sustain a full season is a wait and see. Like Pitto find a backup Ruckman... recruit a Goldy for a 2-year contract as support (should've done that last year when he was a chance to be snapped up) and to play 12-15+ games... or find another young Ruckman at 22-24 not getting much of a go in AFL/VFL wherever.
Pitto & a Pitto clone does not make us a better side next year.. IMO we need to put it all on the line to sign Sean Darcy, offload TDK which frees up $500k and then find another $300 to get Darcy.. During the Hawks & Brisbane glory years players were prepared to sacrifice $ to bring in players they felt would win them a flag.. Crippa & Walsh might sacrifice $100k each if they can be guaranteed silver service at every stoppage, or Crippa can lead and galvanise those on big $ to take a little haircut each to bring in an asset like Darcy which gives them a chance at glory.

Darcy is contracted until 2024 so will need to find some picks, I would do whatever we get for TDK + a future 1st, then offer Darcy a 6 year deal.
 
Not true. If we trade them their original salary would not get included in our cap. That would make 0 sense.

If we trade them they would need to agree on a salary with the new club. Only if the new club is unwilling to match their current wages and the player is unwilling to take a pay cut would we be forced to make up the difference and that would be included in our cap (just like any contracted player trade).

The only thing we can't do is get them to agree to a pay cut on their existing deal while staying with us. We could give them extra years at a low wage to smooth out the total amount paid to them but their would be risks in that given they will be into 30s when their current contracts expire.

I still cant see us trading them personally. Hewetts contract is good value and not a problem. Williams would be hard to find takers for without us chipping in a fair bit of his contract.
If the talk of front loaded contracts is real, Williams would be on $300k for the next 2 years. Who are we getting that makes us better for less than this, better to hold and hope his body comes good.
 
Pitto & a Pitto clone does not make us a better side next year.. IMO we need to put it all on the line to sign Sean Darcy, offload TDK which frees up $500k and then find another $300 to get Darcy.. During the Hawks & Brisbane glory years players were prepared to sacrifice $ to bring in players they felt would win them a flag.. Crippa & Walsh might sacrifice $100k each if they can be guaranteed silver service at every stoppage, or Crippa can lead and galvanise those on big $ to take a little haircut each to bring in an asset like Darcy which gives them a chance at glory.

Darcy is contracted until 2024 so will need to find some picks, I would do whatever we get for TDK + a future 1st, then offer Darcy a 6 year deal.

If we were to offer Darcy big money I think we just wait a year until he is a free agent. You would think Pitto wouldn't want to resign with us either if we brought Darcy in this year.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Can we please raise the intelligence level here just a tad.

In regards to Williams and Hewett.

They are both free agents, their contracts are included in our salary cap until they expire, even if we trade them.

Someone suggest delist Williams, sure delist a guy on $800,000 with 3 years left on his contract.

be better.
This post is spot on .. every time I come in here delist so and so when they have a contract or trade fisher and Dow for second round pick .. 1 fisher is not getting a second rounder and Dow if he gets to another club it will be in the stocker mould
 
If we were to offer Darcy big money I think we just wait a year until he is a free agent. You would think Pitto wouldn't want to resign with us either if we brought Darcy in this year.
Why wait?? So we just write off 2024 to save on a draft pick.. A pick that in all likelihood will net us the next Lachie O Brien or Kristian Jacksch.. I would happily hand them over to secure a sure bet #1 ruck that we can lock away for the next 6 years whilst we are in our 'window' If we waste 2024, we may as well trade Cripps & Saad because they are unlikely to see a premiership in navy blue. We have not had a ruck that we could rely on since Kreuzer was able to play consistently in 2017 and its about time we addressed this.
 
Disagree, I just think a few of them are badly out of form i.e. Cripps and Hewett.

And Walsh is struggling to have the impact he would normally have...understandably.

If those three were playing decent footy - by their own standards - we'd be having a very different discussion!

I think Walsh is getting better, Cripps and Hewett struggling for form and I am guessing some injury cloud. Also mckay and Weiters out of form on top of that.
 
The decision to bring in Hewett rather than play Setterfield on the ball is a rather poor one in retrospect.

Setterfield gives you a bit more flexibility with his height and is younger. Even with Hewett improving upon his output at the Swans, his lack of speed was always going to compound an existing weakness.

What's worse is his acquisition has meant we're seemingly committed to playing him irrespective of form, and we're also not targeting other players that might address our lack of speed.

It was a rather poor list management decision given our existing depth and needs elsewhere.

Well at the time, we weren’t convinced Kennedy would kick on further and setters had been used wrong, also Hewett wasn’t specifically on ball for swans.

I’m a fan of George, I think he is struggling a bit at the moment and still think he was a shrewd acquisition. I don’t think we are playing him simply because we recruited him, he has a fair few credits in the bank. Though he’d want to lift his effectiveness sooner rather than later.
 
The decision to bring in Hewett rather than play Setterfield on the ball is a rather poor one in retrospect.

Setterfield gives you a bit more flexibility with his height and is younger. Even with Hewett improving upon his output at the Swans, his lack of speed was always going to compound an existing weakness.

What's worse is his acquisition has meant we're seemingly committed to playing him irrespective of form, and we're also not targeting other players that might address our lack of speed.

It was a rather poor list management decision given our existing depth and needs elsewhere.
Setterfield started the season really well against Hawks and Suns. His form since then has only be passable.
 
Recruits Revisited

A lot of players look better when in form (obviously) or when we're doing well. A whole heap of St Kilda's list looked like crap last year, but have that new Ross gloss this year. With this in mind, some of the blokes we've traded in are getting unfairly maligned. Even more unfairly, I think SOS and Austin are being viewed a bit irrationally.

Let's look at the trade at the time vs where they are now.

1) McGovern - SOS/Teague special. IMO at the time a lot of us questioned the wisdom of this trade, both from a draft capital perspective and salary. McGovern had always been injury prone at the Crows and while he had been a highlight machine, he had never produced consistently and was far from an 'elite' 3rd tall. That we paid the equivalent draft capital of pick ~13 for him + a long term contract of $750k+ per year was clearly overs. The mitigating factor here was that we needed mature bodies to help out our very young list and young forwardline. We also were desperate to be seen as a 'destination club' again.

Now - he's never gotten his body right, but touch wood so far he seems to be having his best year with us as a 3rd tall defender.

2) Martin - SOS. Martin's recruit was widely celebrated as a coup. We paid ZERO draft picks for him and yes, perhaps paid an inflated contract price but he had undeniable talent and potential at the time...and it was widely hoped that he would achieve consistency at a large and professional club.

Now - disappointing. We had high hopes that he would be the missing piece to our forward line. Instead, while he's shown moments of brilliance, he's never had a consistent run of games, let alone a consistent run of GOOD games. I still think that at age 28, he could still turn it around. But I'd have this at less than 50% likelihood now. Still, I see this as costing far less than McGovern. Hes disappointed us, but the actual recruitment was fine.

3) Williams - Austin. Seen as an inflated salary, but again at ZERO draft picks that was somewhat mitigated. The fact that he has never gotten his body right with us is again disappointing. I have him as less of a fail than McGovern, but worse than Martin.

Now - at the end of the day he's a luxury to have in the backline, and not good enough as a full time mid. If fit, he's best 22.

4) Hewett - Austin. Seen as an incredibly good pickup at ~$450k/year. Was seen as the recruit of the year for Season 2022. Had a fantastic year for us.

Now - let's not sugarcoat it, he's been bad in 2023. He hurt his hand and hasn't been the same. Not sure if this is mental or if he needs rest, but him playin is actively hurting the team. At his best, he's probably in our best 15 players. At present, I'd have him behind 5 others in the midfield...yet he seems safe as houses. Still, at the end of the day he's not on a high salary and his 2022 alone is better than anything than what recruits 1-3 have ever produced. He's still a big tick.

5) Cerra - We paid a lot for him, but he was worth a lot on the open market. Probably even more. With high potential and strengths which are genuinely scarce in our team - he again, was a coup.

Now - Cez is probably leading our best and fairest in 2023. He's silky and smart. He's only getting better. Can't fault him at all this year (off field interview about finals notwithstanding lol). Big tick.
 
Those draft watchers, be interested to know of the players on our list how many were drafted with concerns around their kicking?

Paddy Dow - it was his biggest weakness

 
17 is closer to the number we need to move on than 10. and back Austin in
That's more than illogical, it's just silly. We would paying out numerous contracts and have no salary cap space. We have limited draft collateral and if we even picked up a few picks from this "clear out" we would bevysing draft picks in the 90's and hundreds to replace them.

Can we open a "nonsensical list management" thread for these suggestions or even better wait till the season plays out before we make bold prognostications?
 
Paddy Dow - it was his biggest weakness

That is very sad reading if you consider what he has become..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top