- Dec 22, 2006
- 9,718
- 11,598
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur
Those draft watchers, be interested to know of the players on our list how many were drafted with concerns around their kicking?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can blame it on getting:
McGovern
Williams
Martin
And inexplicably offering longer term deals for guys like Dow(at least his ends this year) and even LOB is contracted for 2024. Fisher for 2025. Wtf are we offering these longer deals for guys who no one else would want?
Dow has no trade currency.I'm with you on that, i think we need a mini rebuild, gotta do some aggressive trading. Over the next 2 years or so id go with this from your list.
1.Lob delist seen enough
2.Mcgov wait and see, if he continues playing ok, maybe offer a year
3.Dow trade if possible or delist
4.Fisher trade for sure has some currency
5.Kennedy/hewitt, keep hewitt trade kennedy, he would probably net us a decent draft pick
6.Ed delist
7.Martin trade/delist
8.Marchbank delist
9 Cunners would be the first one on my list to delist
10.Tdk/pitto potentially trade tdk if good offer or whatever otherwise keep both
11.Acres keep
12.Williams give him to end of next year. If same same then delist/trade
13.Plowman delist
14.Honey delist
15 Philp delist
16.Mirkov dont know much about tbh. Delist i guess
17.Sos/kemp sos is a solid foot soldier, need them in ur team. Kemp id keep give him more time, he seems like hes improving.
Genuine question, was Silvagni responsible for bringing all three of those across ?
Basically at the moment it seems if we keep TDK we have to overpay his "worth" and he'll be hanging on till free agency then hike himself up, we keep Pitto he's a reasonable ruckman but can he sustain a full season is a wait and see. Like Pitto find a back up ruckman... recruit a Goldy for a 2 year contract as support (should've done that last year when he was a chance to be snapped up) and to play 12-15+ games... or find another young ruckman at 22-24 not getting much of a go in AFL/VFL wherever.People have been saying they are happy for TDK or Pitto to go at seasons end, does that mean you're happy to go into next season with just Pittonet, with Mirkov/Lemmey as the back up? Given our salary cap squeeze, won't be a lot of coin to chase an established ruck so who are we bringing in that could immediately improve us?
And most of our problems seem to stem from those guys.I'm with you. Rebuild the list as quickly as possible. Not getting 3-4 players per year like we've been doing, it's a waste of time.
We have 2 Coleman medalist, 2 number 1 draft pick players, and a Brownlow medalist. Build a list around them. We have no time.
Not sure where the Setterfield hype is coming from...
Setterfield is having a Career best year for * and his output is still even/less than Hewett, who we'd all agree is out of form this year...
Good list management decision for me...
George Hewett and Will Setterfield AFL Stats Comparison
George Hewett and Will Setterfield AFL Stats Comparison.www.footywire.com
The difference in their contracts our included in our salary cap... we don't know if we've also forward paid either... so if they get traded we only pay the differential on our cap.Can we please raise the intelligence level here just a tad.
In regards to Williams and Hewett.
They are both free agents, their contracts are included in our salary cap until they expire, even if we trade them.
Someone suggest delist Williams, sure delist a guy on $800,000 with 3 years left on his contract.
be better.
Can we please raise the intelligence level here just a tad.
In regards to Williams and Hewett.
They are both free agents, their contracts are included in our salary cap until they expire, even if we trade them.
Someone suggest delist Williams, sure delist a guy on $800,000 with 3 years left on his contract.
be better.
Pitto & a Pitto clone does not make us a better side next year.. IMO we need to put it all on the line to sign Sean Darcy, offload TDK which frees up $500k and then find another $300 to get Darcy.. During the Hawks & Brisbane glory years players were prepared to sacrifice $ to bring in players they felt would win them a flag.. Crippa & Walsh might sacrifice $100k each if they can be guaranteed silver service at every stoppage, or Crippa can lead and galvanise those on big $ to take a little haircut each to bring in an asset like Darcy which gives them a chance at glory.Basically at the moment it seems if we keep TDK we have to overpay his "worth" and he'll be hanging on till free agency then hike himself up, we keep Pitto he's a reasonable ruckman but can he sustain a full season is a wait and see. Like Pitto find a backup Ruckman... recruit a Goldy for a 2-year contract as support (should've done that last year when he was a chance to be snapped up) and to play 12-15+ games... or find another young Ruckman at 22-24 not getting much of a go in AFL/VFL wherever.
If the talk of front loaded contracts is real, Williams would be on $300k for the next 2 years. Who are we getting that makes us better for less than this, better to hold and hope his body comes good.Not true. If we trade them their original salary would not get included in our cap. That would make 0 sense.
If we trade them they would need to agree on a salary with the new club. Only if the new club is unwilling to match their current wages and the player is unwilling to take a pay cut would we be forced to make up the difference and that would be included in our cap (just like any contracted player trade).
The only thing we can't do is get them to agree to a pay cut on their existing deal while staying with us. We could give them extra years at a low wage to smooth out the total amount paid to them but their would be risks in that given they will be into 30s when their current contracts expire.
I still cant see us trading them personally. Hewetts contract is good value and not a problem. Williams would be hard to find takers for without us chipping in a fair bit of his contract.
Pitto & a Pitto clone does not make us a better side next year.. IMO we need to put it all on the line to sign Sean Darcy, offload TDK which frees up $500k and then find another $300 to get Darcy.. During the Hawks & Brisbane glory years players were prepared to sacrifice $ to bring in players they felt would win them a flag.. Crippa & Walsh might sacrifice $100k each if they can be guaranteed silver service at every stoppage, or Crippa can lead and galvanise those on big $ to take a little haircut each to bring in an asset like Darcy which gives them a chance at glory.
Darcy is contracted until 2024 so will need to find some picks, I would do whatever we get for TDK + a future 1st, then offer Darcy a 6 year deal.
This post is spot on .. every time I come in here delist so and so when they have a contract or trade fisher and Dow for second round pick .. 1 fisher is not getting a second rounder and Dow if he gets to another club it will be in the stocker mouldCan we please raise the intelligence level here just a tad.
In regards to Williams and Hewett.
They are both free agents, their contracts are included in our salary cap until they expire, even if we trade them.
Someone suggest delist Williams, sure delist a guy on $800,000 with 3 years left on his contract.
be better.
Why wait?? So we just write off 2024 to save on a draft pick.. A pick that in all likelihood will net us the next Lachie O Brien or Kristian Jacksch.. I would happily hand them over to secure a sure bet #1 ruck that we can lock away for the next 6 years whilst we are in our 'window' If we waste 2024, we may as well trade Cripps & Saad because they are unlikely to see a premiership in navy blue. We have not had a ruck that we could rely on since Kreuzer was able to play consistently in 2017 and its about time we addressed this.If we were to offer Darcy big money I think we just wait a year until he is a free agent. You would think Pitto wouldn't want to resign with us either if we brought Darcy in this year.
Disagree, I just think a few of them are badly out of form i.e. Cripps and Hewett.
And Walsh is struggling to have the impact he would normally have...understandably.
If those three were playing decent footy - by their own standards - we'd be having a very different discussion!
The decision to bring in Hewett rather than play Setterfield on the ball is a rather poor one in retrospect.
Setterfield gives you a bit more flexibility with his height and is younger. Even with Hewett improving upon his output at the Swans, his lack of speed was always going to compound an existing weakness.
What's worse is his acquisition has meant we're seemingly committed to playing him irrespective of form, and we're also not targeting other players that might address our lack of speed.
It was a rather poor list management decision given our existing depth and needs elsewhere.
Setterfield started the season really well against Hawks and Suns. His form since then has only be passable.The decision to bring in Hewett rather than play Setterfield on the ball is a rather poor one in retrospect.
Setterfield gives you a bit more flexibility with his height and is younger. Even with Hewett improving upon his output at the Swans, his lack of speed was always going to compound an existing weakness.
What's worse is his acquisition has meant we're seemingly committed to playing him irrespective of form, and we're also not targeting other players that might address our lack of speed.
It was a rather poor list management decision given our existing depth and needs elsewhere.
Those draft watchers, be interested to know of the players on our list how many were drafted with concerns around their kicking?
Lots of rookiesHow would you propose replacing them? That's 15 players we need to bring in via draft, free agency or trade. Currently we have one 1st round pick, and two 4th round picks.
You don'tIt's easy to put a list of players who should go on a discussion forum like this. But the question is, how do you replace them with better quality with most ready to go... LM is about improving the list, not just changing it....
17 is closer to the number we need to move on than 10. and back Austin inI’m happy to try offload 17 players this year.. via trade or delist or retire
- LOB
- McGov
- Dow
- Fisher
- Kennedy/Hewett
- Ed
- Martin
- Marchbank
- Cunners
- TDK/Pitto
- Acres
- Williams
- Pkowman
- Honey
- Philp
- Mirkov
- SOS/Kemp
That's more than illogical, it's just silly. We would paying out numerous contracts and have no salary cap space. We have limited draft collateral and if we even picked up a few picks from this "clear out" we would bevysing draft picks in the 90's and hundreds to replace them.17 is closer to the number we need to move on than 10. and back Austin in
That is very sad reading if you consider what he has become..Paddy Dow - it was his biggest weakness
Paddy Dow Draft Profile
DRAFT ANALYSIS: "Paddy Dow is one of the best players in the 2017 draft crop with his trademark burst speed and vision out of a stoppage among his top traits"central.rookieme.com