Game Day 2023 Round 8 Discussion - where are our Rookies ?

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
We really need a rule change to deal with subs and injuries. Maybe a rule if either happens and your emergency scores more, then the emergency comes in?
Should we call it the "Jiska" Rule :p

Hey, I copped the late LDU out .....you've been favoured with Ridley
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Should we call it the "Jiska" Rule :p

Hey, I copped the late LDU out .....you've been favoured with Ridley
Late outs are covered by emergencies already. A few have copped subs this year, like Saad last week.
 
Rightio Norf fans. Talk to me about Drury. Need to decide if I roll the dice for him to outscore 50.
We don't know whether Drury will play back or fwd ....will make a huge difference
 
I don't disagree, but not sure how it would work.

SC has always largely been about avoiding injuries.
Well, I guess it works like that. If your emergency scores more, they come in. It would also effectively incentivise against looping, which I think is also a good thing.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Late outs are covered by emergencies already. A few have copped subs this year, like Saad last week.
Not if an (E) has already been used ....or all your bench players have played already
 
2 of 4 polling booths have posted their results and we have a large 37.5% swing away from JHF - Anthony Green updates prediction to a Likely Loss

astonishing results coming from booth 3 - JHF has polled at 100% to completely turned this around and now looks like winning in a landslide

Anthony Green has just fainted.
 
* off Rozee you downhill skiing kent

Good to know it’s only players in my team who get punished by early clanger tax
I said in the PS thread .....JHF would impact Rozee .....now with Rozee, Wines, Butters, and JHF .....that's a lot of mouths to feed, when PORT are one of the worst SC point scorers
 
Not if an (E) has already been used ....or all your bench players have played already
Your E was already used because you made the choice to use a loophole, not because it was used for the purpose it exists for.
 
Your E was already used because you made the choice to use a loophole, not because it was used for the purpose it exists for.
It exists for me as the Loophole option :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top