dogs105
Sweet Kennels Proprietor
Gee, he had good hands... stickiest fingers ever.Well even though we disagree on many many things (particularly Murphy) - I am glad we can agree on something.
I still think Bryan Beinke will come good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gee, he had good hands... stickiest fingers ever.Well even though we disagree on many many things (particularly Murphy) - I am glad we can agree on something.
I still think Bryan Beinke will come good.
Where did I say a source gave me intel about Murphy playing?lol. lmao even. You brag about how you can admit when you get it wrong and then utterly fail to at every opportunity.
You laughed off Ronald McDonald and he was right about us getting Curtin.
You said that Curtin wouldn't play the showdown and that Murphy would, you were wrong. But no; that was just your "source" giving you wrong Intel. Whether he is or isn't in the team now is utterly irrelevant to that fact.
Below is my opinion on what might happen. Here's a tip the words "but reckon" suggests it was an opinion. But hey if you can find a post where I claimed a source said Murphy would be playing put up or shut up.Clearly the directive is to talk down the performances of the SANFL players to deflect from the coaches copping selection scrutiny
Can you imagine bringing him in though? It would have sent a horrendous message to the team. He was on the verge of being dropped and played an average game, despite Wright pumping him up.
But reckon he will be in after one more game and replaces McHenry.
To my surprise they played him at half back, hence why I said it would be interesting where he would play due to match up concerns.They see him as a tall defender, he ain’t play midfield or half back unless there’s a suitable match up.
He’s going to be a gun player but he’s a bad match for us
CurtinSurprising player to play forward tomorrow against Hawks.
You know what dogs, feel free to PM me. I will share the contents of my discussion as long as you dont tell 979810Can I please get a PM?
I also like Pedlar, Cook, Keane, Dowling and Taylor from our less established players.Well even though we disagree on many many things (particularly Murphy) - I am glad we can agree on something.
I still think Bryan Beinke will come good.
"s-sure, I said that I didn't think Curtin would play based on a conversation, and I was super secretive about this conversation, but I didn't use the word "source" so it wasn't a source."Where did I say a source gave me intel about Murphy playing?
This post is clearly a tongue in cheek dig at the club.
Below is my opinion on what might happen. Here's a tip the words "but reckon" suggests it was an opinion. But hey if you can find a post where I claimed a source said Murphy would be playing put up or shut up.
As for Curtin, I didn't believe he would play based on a conversation, noting again the absence of the word source:
This is an odd one... who would be a surprise?Surprising player to play forward tomorrow against Hawks.
Ron Mac was/is full of it"s-sure, I said that I didn't think Curtin would play based on a conversation, and I was super secretive about this conversation, but I didn't use the word "source" so it wasn't a source."
I'm clearly talking about the Curtin selection thing, not Murphy. Note as well that you completely ignore the Ronald McDonald thing. No way to weasel out of that one?
You know what dogs, feel free to PM me. I will share the contents of my discussion as long as you dont tell 979810
That’s the wish version of redhorseThis is an odd one... who would be a surprise?
I'll guess Laird.
He was right about us trading with GWS, and right that it was for Curtin. Well before anybody else too.Ron Mac was/is full of it
Yes thank you for doing so .
What's the point of rumour thread if everyone too scared too do so because of those who are on here just to take personal attacks like Sanders , George Kramer etc etc , who stroke their ego with in their own mind superior intellect.
A chat with someone who might know something is a rumour or any info received from various sources is a rumour .
Noting also sometimes nothing actually happened doesn't mean the rumour wasn't correct anyway.
I'm clearly talking about the Curtin selection thing, not Murphy. Note as well that you completely ignore the Ronald McDonald thing. No way to weasel out of that one?
Clearly talking about the Curtin thing but not Murphy even after mentioning Murphy? The conversation was about Murphy as well. Cant back track from that.lol. lmao even. You brag about how you can admit when you get it wrong and then utterly fail to at every opportunity.
You laughed off Ronald McDonald and he was right about us getting Curtin.
You said that Curtin wouldn't play the showdown and that Murphy would, you were wrong. But no; that was just your "source" giving you wrong Intel. Whether he is or isn't in the team now is utterly irrelevant to that fact.
Dont mind Dogs, he's got a decent sense of humour, you should try itAnd just like that Dogs - you have added a friend.
Dont mind Dogs, he's got a decent sense of humour, you should try it
Butts at full forward?Surprising player to play forward tomorrow against Hawks.
185cm. If only he was a bit tallerDon't mind Murphy. He puts his head over the ball and is very team first. Limited player, but I think treated a bit unfairly on here sometimes. Is capable of winning the hard ball and getting it out.
I think that I generally I see the positives more than negatives (for longer than some/most anyway). I kept faith with Fogarty, backed Ian Perrie and thought that Bryan Beinke was going to be a bit special.
Couldn't physically be curtin, not even an emergency. Jones...3 goals last week
We actually call it the Gridiron GangMate. Not here for a popularity contest. I love talking Crows - thats why I am here.
Just saying - those that come to an online forum to make friends would be much more likely to invent contacts/stories to keep those friends.
Sure do. Love it. It's a great way to discuss the Crows.
Well isn't that just harsh. Happy to stand by my shitty football opinions and not invent fake sources when I get them wrong.
And we all use this forum differently. Not having a crack that you are here to make friends - best of luck to you.
Woooohooooooo .. the big fishInteresting reading...I left the board because the info provided didn't seem to be believed by most, and that's fair I get that. But if anyone wants to do the research I was correct and broke info before it came out in media. Was wrong on a couple, but can only say what is told to me. The person I get info from is from Carlton (still is) so alot of the stuff he hears from outside source aswell. But having said that...I thought I'd come back for firstly a bit of entertainment and secondly. The "Big Fish" everyone is so intent on getting is coming this trade period. Already agreed on, it will make alot of people happy.
Interesting reading...I left the board because the info provided didn't seem to be believed by most, and that's fair I get that. But if anyone wants to do the research I was correct and broke info before it came out in media. Was wrong on a couple, but can only say what is told to me. The person I get info from is from Carlton (still is) so alot of the stuff he hears from outside source aswell. But having said that...I thought I'd come back for firstly a bit of entertainment and secondly. The "Big Fish" everyone is so intent on getting is coming this trade period. Already agreed on, it will make alot of people happy.