List Mgmt. 2023 Trade & List Management Thread II - Goldy&Bucket➡️✅/'24 EoFR & #44➡️Stephens&#25✅/#21&#25➡️Fisher&#17✅/'24 EoFR➡️#18✅

[Lore]

Hello Shinboners!

The embedded resources below are kept up to date by the trade board mods (as much as possible – we are human after all). Enjoy!

Spoiler: 2023 Draft Order

Spoiler: 2024 Draft Order, aka Future Picks

Spoiler: Blue Tick Rumours

 

[Hearts to hearts]

If it is all true maybe we have a secret secret weapon.

 

[hilly]

Up there with Trade Whisperer for accuracy.

On SM-S901E using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Up there with Trade Whisperer for accuracy.

On SM-S901E using BigFooty.com mobile app

Not as reliable as the trade guru…

 

[shinboner magic]

I’m still waiting for the trade of player that starts with ‘J’

 

[Psicosis]

 

[Disco Dew]

This the campaigner deleting tweets recently? Lol

 

[shinboner magic]

Not as reliable as the trade guru…

Fact not fiction

 

[big_e]

A real Texas sharpshooter, this one.

 

[Merlin007]

this may - or may not - be as reliable as steveJ's sure thing last year that we had Todd Marshall in the bag.

time is the judge of all things - including ducks in a row

 

[blackshadow]

Somewhere between a mid 2nd to early 3rd round pick will get it done. Nothing stupid like we did with CCJ to get an uncontracted player in the door

Has played 43 games in 4 years and dropped for their first final, Sydney are kidding themselves If think getting a top 20 pick.

Will be a handy get for us, at worst is an upgrade on what we have and at best the upside is there to become a key player and in the age bracket of our list.

That's a lot of typing when you could have just said PSD.

 

[Its a Process]

When you add everything...

WCE get 2 & 7
NM get 1, 18 (20 if GWS beat Port)
GWS get 3

Unless 18 and 20 go to GC for pick 4 (where they'll still be worth 14 and 16 when they match a Walter bid) it's a bad trade.

Assuming we have to bid on Sanders won’t those picks just get swallowed up by his bid?

So
1. Reid and Sanders
Vs
2. Curtain, McKelcher and Sanders

Is that roughly the equation?

 

[Shermanator]

 

[JGreezy]

View attachment 1803081View attachment 1803082

I'd have so much fun trolling if I was in his position

 

[The Filth Wizard]

When you add everything...

WCE get 2 & 7
NM get 1, 18 (20 if GWS beat Port)
GWS get 3

Unless 18 and 20 go to GC for pick 4 (where they'll still be worth 14 and 16 when they match a Walter bid) it's a bad trade.

Yep it’s an awful trade.

This forum was posturing a week ago about making West Coast take Curtin at 1 if they want him but now we’re trading out 2 & 3 for Reid and shit all.

Not to mention to even make it look slightly attractive we’d have to include GC who will more than likely not want to trade pick 4 strictly for points.

 

[krakouers]

I'd have so much fun trolling if I was in his position

Need to make your own where we can suggest options…
The Trader Goatherder?

 

[chubbspeterson]

Just spit-balling a hypothetical which won't be worth doing if Sanders bid is involved obviously but though I'd have a crack at it.

Dogs trade picks 10 and 17 to GC for pick 4 (pick 43 equiv extra pts to GC)
North split pick 3 for pick 6 and 13-16 from GWS (pick 26-32 equiv to North)
GC on-trade pick 10 to North for Port 1st (14-18) and pick 38 (pick 54 plus pts to GC)
North trade picks 2, 10 to WCE for pick 1 and 19. Could add a swap of our F3 for their F2 perhaps or something?

North end up with 1, 6 (GWS), 13-16 (GWS), 19 (WCE)
WCE get 2 and 10
Dogs get 4
GC have 14-18 (Port 1st) and 17 (Dogs)
GWS get pick 3

 

[big_e]

I know some people were keen.

 

[Shinboner1]

I know some people were keen.

He's their #1 ruckman.
Was never going to leave.

 

[Sillygit]

Fact not fiction

still waiting on one of you campaigners to dust off the ol' log in for a laugh

 

[Benj7]

Any w***er suggesting we trade 2 & 3 for 1 is dumb as dog shit and should be banned. Why would anyone do anything remotely lose to that ffs.

 

[Roostorm]

And the crazy seasons hasn’t begun yet…..certainly shaping up as an interesting one this year, with many scatter gun approaches and tall tales, padded wafting from media experts, way to much over thinking of players liking Insta picks, inappropriate Insta picks, supposed sightings and wars over tasty delectables, bonkers trade scenarios ….ah never a dull moment..let the fun begin
l this time of the year

 

[Shinboner1]

Assuming we have to bid on Sanders won’t those picks just get swallowed up by his bid?

So
1. Reid and Sanders
Vs
2. Curtain, McKelcher and Sanders

Is that roughly the equation?

I know which one I'm picking

 

[Lomas]

Any w***er suggesting we trade 2 & 3 for 1 is dumb as dog s**t and should be banned. Why would anyone do anything remotely lose to that ffs.

It is absolutely baffling

 

[New_Roo]

Assuming we have to bid on Sanders won’t those picks just get swallowed up by his bid?

So
1. Reid and Sanders
Vs
2. Curtain, McKelcher and Sanders

Is that roughly the equation?

I'd prob start by getting the names right!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[hellas_johnny]

Just spit-balling a hypothetical which won't be worth doing if Sanders bid is involved obviously but though I'd have a crack at it.

Dogs trade picks 10 and 17 to GC for pick 4 (pick 43 equiv extra pts to GC)
North split pick 3 for pick 6 and 13-16 from GWS (pick 26-32 equiv to North)
GC on-trade pick 10 to North for Port 1st (14-18) and pick 38 (pick 54 plus pts to GC)
North trade picks 2, 10 to WCE for pick 1 and 19. Could add a swap of our F3 for their F2 perhaps or something?

North end up with 1, 6 (GWS), 13-16 (GWS), 19 (WCE)
WCE get 2 and 10
Dogs get 4
GC have 14-18 (Port 1st) and 17 (Dogs)
GWS get pick 3

would defs consider this. having 4 picks in the top 20 would do wonders to both filling in positional needs aswell as quality. reid 1 o sullivan 6 then archer reid and edwards at the other 2 picks.