List Mgmt. 2023 Trade & List Management Thread II - Goldy&Bucket➡️✅/'24 EoFR & #44➡️Stephens&#25✅/#21&#25➡️Fisher&#17✅/'24 EoFR➡️#18✅

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.


I don't get it even being mooted. They weren't in consideration with 6, 14 and future first. They've barely nudged forward and none of those picks get the Eagles anyone of worth.
 
I don't get it even being mooted. They weren't in consideration with 6, 14 and future first. They've barely nudged forward and none of those picks get the Eagles anyone of worth.
I suppose it is a little better than our original offer.
 
Something similar what we were offered by Crows in the JHF draft I think . Still don’t think is very good and we knocked it back . I think we are in the box seat IF we want it done
Agree with you
Expect that’s the deal Melb would offer though
Would they accept it? Possibly
Would you or I? No
But I’m still not expecting us to offer more than 2, say 15 and 21 which they won’t accept
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Been told we are after Cats pick 8

Have offered them 18, 21 and 25 for it

2 and 8 then go to Eagles for pick 1

Leaving us with 1,3 and 15

Think I'd prefer 2,3,8,15 personally.

McKercher, Duursma/Watson, O'Sullivan, Leake

O'Sullivan or Caddy for potentially Mitch Edwards, Archer Reid and Jiath is a hell of a price to pay though.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don't get it even being mooted. They weren't in consideration with 6, 14 and future first. They've barely nudged forward and none of those picks get the Eagles anyone of worth.
Only going to use roos_fanatic08 rankings as a guide

6 Duurrsma
11 Wilson
FF - Allocated to their 2024 haul

Does help them out plenty and partly solves their mid problem
 
The points don't really matter as we're just trading picks. At that I'd like it better if we held 25. It would be interesting to offer 2, 15 and 25 to WC before dealing with 8.
Yeah I think 3 picks is one too many, should be able to get it done with 15 and 25 or 18 and 21.
 
We are going after 7 or 8 obviously to offer it to WCE . But if we get it we might think hang on that looks pretty good let’s just keep it. Imo it will take 2 top ten picks minimum for WCE, I would if I was them.
 
Think I'd prefer 2,3,8,15 personally.

McKercher, Duursma/Watson, O'Sullivan, Leake

O'Sullivan or Caddy for potentially Mitch Edwards, Archer Reid and Jiath is a hell of a price to pay though.
Fully agree. This all in on Reid is a real waste of needed picks.
 
If we say 2 and 8 they will be interested might be something else added which I prefer us not to do though
They can add their 2nd rounder and we can add pick 25.

Then we have first pick on night 2 and we have the ability to get huge overs for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top