Hope not.Their body language after the Andrew pick got announced suggested that was it for us.
Still some decent players around, why wait for everyone else to get another pick in the rookie draft...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hope not.Their body language after the Andrew pick got announced suggested that was it for us.
We evidently rated Andrew higher than Cochran (or at least saw him as suitable to our needs) which justifies us passing on him. Glad we had the balls to do it.
It's 2 in addition to them.We promised 2 players we would rookie them i think so isn't that us done?
We promised 2 players we would rookie them i think so isn't that us done?
& 87Pick 81
Might take a swing on Kennedy
Has Hamish Davis gone?
Hamling and FrancisWe promised 2 players we would rookie them i think so isn't that us done?
& 87
And you said I couldn't dance.....The fact that Hamish Davis is still there leaves me to conclude I’m the worst judge of talent ever.
The fact that Hamish Davis is still there leaves me to conclude I’m the worst judge of talent ever.
Bizarre given the level he's performed at.The fact that Hamish Davis is still there leaves me to conclude I’m the worst judge of talent ever.
He’s not a great field kick - but jeeez, everyone at Claremont though he was the no.1 from the club.Nah must be something negative around him not to be picked by 60 odd
I would be absolutely floored if we used a pick in the 80s LOL
Pick 53, so yeah close. Only 30 picks off.probably right but wasn’t Snell that range?
He’s not a great field kick - but jeeez, everyone at Claremont though he was the no.1 from the club.
The fact that Hamish Davis is still there leaves me to conclude I’m the worst judge of talent ever.
Pick 53, so yeah close. Only 30 picks off.
Hey now you didn't draft Konstanty , Ling, Stephens etc