Ford Fairlane
Moderator
- Feb 21, 2002
- 81,896
- 202,122
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Magpies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The old rule was 38+6.
Since Covid it is 38+4
Then CatB are extra. Hence why good cat B is incredibly valuable and if Benny sneaks onto our list as cat B we'll be stoked. It's also why the SANFL team has struggled that bit more to field a side as we've been playing with 2 less AFL players the last few years.
From a depth perspective, and a competitiveness of the SANFL side, having players that are quality, and not just developing kids, like Irra, Frederick or Barrett, is a huge boost vs picking a kid from div 1 ammos. If Moss can also play, then happy days.So if we missed out Barrett as a Cat B we should go chase an irishman
So if we missed out Barrett as a Cat B we should go chase an irishman
I've been banging this drum for a while now. It's such a cheap and low risk way to potentially uncover a diamond in the rough. We must be the only club in the league who hasn't had an Irish success story across mens or womens.
Yep. We have some flexibility with our picks.(and potential trading) Could be 3 plus 2, 4 plus one or 5.
With so much vulnerability and deadwood still on our list (concussion prone Marshall, McEntee, Williams, Charleson, injury prone Jackson, a flaky Finlayson, Boak), we should be bringing in 7 players not 5, especially given the depth in this pool and us already trading out of a compromised draft pool next year.Yep. We have some flexibility with our picks.(and potential trading) Could be 3 plus 2, 4 plus one or 5.
No one is trying to predict or act as if they have Intel when they do mock drafts lol
It's a case of rationalising a pick to a club. Not sure why you thought it would tell you who the club is targeting.
I've been banging this drum for a while now. It's such a cheap and low risk way to potentially uncover a diamond in the rough. We must be the only club in the league who hasn't had an Irish success story across mens or womens.
Id say there's likely one indigenous player gets drafted this year that isn't F/S
Plenty of diamonds in the rough on our doorstep.
I don't think there's lack of talent in Australia.
Let’s find our version of Chris Grant.
I’d almost forgotten, thanks.We also have Ratkins!
"I feel like the way I conduct myself at training and the way I go about things with my work habits and how competitive I am are the natural traits of me being a leader," Travaglia said. "I'm a vocal leader but also lead by my actions. I definitely feel going forward it's something I can definitely do in the future."
When it comes to the way Travaglia has played as a junior and what he has the potential to do in the AFL down the track, recruiters draw parallels with Will Day. Before Day became a Peter Crimmins medallist at Hawthorn, the South Australian was a skinny half-back from Sacred Heart College. Some thought pick No.13 was a high price to pay for Day. It wasn't.
He looks sharp, the 50 wasn’t smart but it shows he’s got some passion about playing.Tobie Travaglia - still think if he's on the table at our pick, Parker is grabbing him just like another pick 13.
https://www.afl.com.au/news/1253828...-u18-moment-getting-the-better-of-harley-reid
I've been banging this drum for a while now. It's such a cheap and low risk way to potentially uncover a diamond in the rough. We must be the only club in the league who hasn't had an Irish success story across mens or womens.
Dylan Alexander’s mock had Armstrong sliding to us, and us taking him. He’d be difficult to pass up if there and would set our key forward stocks up for a very long time.
It is implied in the suggestions we want to trade up from 13.
That would need to include at least one of them.
And I can't see any of our father sons or NGA being worth 36.
So if we want to select them then it would make some sense to use that pick elsewhere.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
The reason we need a forward/mid in the Berry mould at 13:
1. We are in the premiership window- recruit for now
Berry is definitely one i'm coming around to, even though I still have him lower than most others do in my rankings. He does fill a need, he looks like a Parker pick.
Would still prefer Hotton if we are going for a small who can play forward though. His forward craft is very good and there is obvious midfield potential, plus I feel he will become the better player.
Ah I don't see the speed being an issue tbh. For starters I think he's got plenty of speed around him, so someone who can hit a target is important. Endurance wise, I get your point and agree. But he's put in a tonne of work this year into his conditioning and has been able to run out games far better. He's a leader too (co-captain at Stingrays) so his work ethic is top notch. I think he can easily play in 2025 in a forward line tbh.
For me, it's between him or Dattoli. If you look at the positives, he can break tackles easily which is an important trait in modern day footy. He's not slow, he's just not ultra quick. But his disposals are usually very effective and up forward he's a marking target. He's tall but I wouldn't say, at least yet, that he's a big body like Jones.
Both were, I couldn't convince myself to take a Half-Back at 13, just didn't seem like what we needed. I know there's an argument for Travaglia to move into midfield but that won't happen imo with us for at least a couple years.
Hotton there, but I think he'll slip on draft night too. I guess I went for exposed form over the small sample size + ACL. Club might have a different view on it than me but I for one am excited to see what Hynes would be able to do in that forward half. He's criminally underrated outside Victoria, now there's so much noise amongst Vic clubs.
Didn't allow trading in the mock draft due to difficulties, but certainly would've split the pick if I were allowed to. Just makes way more sense
Seriously, I am gobsmacked that we wouldn’t delist Charleson and McEntee and replace them with two better small forwards from this year’s draft crop. Say Barrett and Bowman with another late pick.
Would be weird to delist Charleston after only just drafting him and him being injured.
Might as well let him have a run at it first.
The list of players I see says last year we closed out with 38 senior players (1 of which was inactive) and 5 rookies (LEvans has to be rookie because MSD are always rookies, he's signed up for 18 months). So let's start with the fact that we have 38 seniors.We ended the season with 1 too many players on our list, due to the mid season injury replacement of SPP by Logan Evans. Thus from the start of 2024, our list changes have been:
IN:
L Evans
Lukosius
Richards
R Atkins
Moss (Cat B)
OUT:
Houston
Dixon
McKenzie
McCallum
Clurey
Narkle (rookie)
Evans
Scully
K Marshall
That is 9 out, 4 in + a cat B.
That means 5 list positions available.
The position of our rookie list is rarely advertised, and we really have no idea who's on it, but unreliable sources seem to indicate that McEntee and Williams are somehow still on it, with Walsh.
We don't truly know how many spots are available on it, but it appears we have 4 main list and 1 rookie list spot. This is questionable though, as we have no idea if Logan Evans has gone to the rookie list or main list.
It is typical our regime. They lack courage to make decisions that count.I've been banging this drum for a while now. It's such a cheap and low risk way to potentially uncover a diamond in the rough. We must be the only club in the league who hasn't had an Irish success story across mens or womens.
Hynes has played a lot of midfield for the Stingrays, not as much was Vic Metro but they had a star studded midfield and they needed a forward target so they used him as that. For the Stingrays, he was in the guts a fair bit, also evident from his highlights. You don't average 24 disposals and a goal a game across 15 games if he play purely forward.Exposed form over hotton?
Does Hyne have exposed form playing in the midfield ? Hotton has shown he is elite at finding the pill in the midfield, has hyne shown that or is it guessing he can transition there after playing bit roles? Genuine question.
Hynes has played a lot of midfield for the Stingrays, not as much was Vic Metro but they had a star studded midfield and they needed a forward target so they used him as that. For the Stingrays, he was in the guts a fair bit, also evident from his highlights. You don't average 24 disposals and a goal a game across 15 games if he play purely forward.
So yes he's got greater exposed form than Hotton in my books. Hotton has greater evasive skills up forward whereas Hynes has better stoppage game and disposal. Fwiw I don't see Hotton playing much midfield time at AFL level, certainly not in 2025 coming off an ACL injury.
The ability to break tackles or at least get his hands free to dish out the ball, something people love in JHF, Hynes does that regularly. His disposals are usually crafty and effective. Imo he already has good midfield craft, has good strength to overpower opposition whether it be to break tackles or lay tackles. Gets first use and his handballs in tight spaces are probably second only to Reid in this draft. I would say he played 60/40 mid-fwd split for Stingrays this year so certainly not new to the midfield group.That’s good, what elite traits does he have as a midfielder besides being big?
Regarding hotton, I couldn’t give a stuff whether a draftee is ready to play midfield in 2025 or not.