Official Club Stuff 2024 AGM - to be held on Friday 6th December 2024, 1 director to be elected by members. Nominations called for.

[Andre]

Was privy to a conversation at the 150th launch end of 2019 where George said you basically can’t have any impact serving on this board, so it’s interesting he’d be potentially having another go at it.

My uninformed guess is then he was the lone guy pushing shit uphill (getting rid of Hinkley). With Warren clearly in that camp, perhaps he's thinking if there are two of them, it won't be so easy to ignore them. Especially if both are on the football committee. If you get both the actual successful footballers recommending ditching Ken early in 2025 when a rough patch is hit, not so easy if it's just 'Oh that's crazy Warren. Just wave a face mask near him and he'll run away', so they can ignore his football acumen.

 

[tribey]

What’s Kathy Nagle up to these days?

 

[Doctor Feel]

Let's put ****ing Ben Perkins on the board.

 

[raptalia]

They're all politicians and if they're not they will be eaten alive by the politicians. Sadly, I think that's what is happening to Tredders, too much trust and not enough ability to politically manoeuvre. He has an agenda that the members want but it is frozen out of the broader agenda by the stone killer politics.

Let's be honest, he was brought in as an agent of change and nothing has changed. Oh wait, Luke Kelly was sacked to be replaced by Cam Sutcliffe. Not a tick.

The guy who could engineer change is one of the Shahins who run Peregrine. Those guys get things done, they work with governments and they squeeze the life out of their opposition. And at least some of them are Port supporters. Don't really expect any of them to either run or be appointed, they would terrify Koch.

My main hope for Tredders is to get things done for the footy department but there is a Game of Thrones sized wall to breach and he has to get better at playing the game.

Tredders was always going to be pushing the proverbial uphill. One member, albeit a former champion, is not going to get a lot done when confronted with the new age corporates who populate the PAFC Board.

I am probably not telling you anything new but George Fiachii has a history of confronting this Board and that is why Koch successfully ran Wanganeen against him a few years back. He tried the same tactic with Bruce Abernethey against Tredders but it did not work.

If Members want to see any significant change they would be better placed with both Tredders and Fiacchi on the Board. These two will still be grossly out numbered but at least they are not lone voices and could generate multiple alternate viewpoints in the media.

The other point is that Tredders and Fiacchi have actually played the game unlike most of the faceless corporates who sit on our Board. That should be of some value.

 

[raptalia]

What’s Kathy Nagle up to these days?

Trying to save the Western Hospital I guess.

 

[Rexie J]

What’s Kathy Nagle up to these days?

Now a medical consultant.

 

[Kenny_Powers]

What good reason would the powerbrokers have for not legislating a return to full member control with the board within the next say 5-10 years?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[El_Scorcho]

What good reason would the powerbrokers have for not legislating a return to full member control with the board within the next say 5-10 years?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Their answer up until now has been that we don't want a board full of past players.

Which, obviously, is a crock of shit, because something like 13 of the last 16 premiers have full member controlled boards and vote in balanced boards.

 

[Enviable Tradition]

What good reason would the powerbrokers have for not legislating a return to full member control with the board within the next say 5-10 years?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Good reason? None.

On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Jonts]

What good reason would the powerbrokers have for not legislating a return to full member control with the board within the next say 5-10 years?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

For the board?

Comfort.

 

[Doctor Feel]

What good reason would the powerbrokers have for not legislating a return to full member control with the board within the next say 5-10 years?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

There is only one reason they have, Fear.

 

[Interstater]

With momentum starting to build for member elected boards for PAFC and AFC once we hit 2028 and the SANFL debts are repaid, it is imperative that someone with a strong belief in an independent PAFC is on the ticket.

The next three years are crucial.

What good reason would the powerbrokers have for not legislating a return to full member control with the board within the next say 5-10 years?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

To help the AFL retain its 2/3rds majority of club votes on AFL matters.
They have a solid block of 5 on top of the "Big Vic Clubs".
Keep control of the AFL where it is.

So when do PAFC stop being one of the pawns?

 

[El Zorro]

What good reason would the powerbrokers have for not legislating a return to full member control with the board within the next say 5-10 years?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

What motivation do they have to do it?

 

[SonOfKek]

Someone get George Fiacchi on the phone

 

[JimmyBC]

There is only one reason they have, Fear.

I think they like being on the tit & as you say they are petrified of members having more influence.

 

[Steve Dore]

Trying to save the Western Hospital I guess.

She's no longer employed by the Western Hospital nor EY.

 

[Steve Dore]

What good reason would the powerbrokers have for not legislating a return to full member control with the board within the next say 5-10 years?

As others have posted fear and comfort.

Fear that they may not be re-elected and comfort in the fact that their board position is safe as long as they stay inside with Koch.