Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
My ideal at the moment:
17 (20/21 on the night)
Hannaford/Hotton/Lindsay/Reid (pretty unlikely those last two) Berry my ultimate but he is not getting to our pick.
25 (29)
Harry Oliver - dont want us to take a speculative player hoping hes a star. Just take a high quality role player who is a list need. Oliver fits the bill as a Duryea replacement and even upgrade. Anyone know hes combine results? Can seem to find them.
Hamish Davis - huge enginge and or pacy mid/small connecting forwards
Is a huge need. Davis has the engine and looks a proper footballer with genuine craft.
Angus Clarke - would love to know his combine testing also. Seems good as a Bailey Dale understudy.
35 - (prob comes in a to 34/33)
Dattoli - yeah he might not have pace but you know he’ll be in the thick of it. Plus we can afford to have one forward without pace just crumbing the front of packs and pressuring opposition. Got some tricks when he gets the footy.
Mraz - Still need a gorilla full back as a jones replacement. Seems to me that Croft if he becomes a backman would more likely be a Lobb replacement.
Busslinger more of a Jake Lever.
Like his competitiveness and tested great for his position. Agility in particular.
Who are others hoping for at each pick at this stage?
Good list, but Dattoli won't be there at 35. I reckon you could swap him and Clarke.My ideal at the moment:
17 (20/21 on the night)
Hannaford/Hotton/Lindsay/Reid (pretty unlikely those last two) Berry my ultimate but he is not getting to our pick.
25 (29)
Harry Oliver - dont want us to take a speculative player hoping hes a star. Just take a high quality role player who is a list need. Oliver fits the bill as a Duryea replacement and even upgrade. Anyone know hes combine results? Can seem to find them.
Hamish Davis - huge enginge and or pacy mid/small connecting forwards
Is a huge need. Davis has the engine and looks a proper footballer with genuine craft.
Angus Clarke - would love to know his combine testing also. Seems good as a Bailey Dale understudy.
35 - (prob comes in a to 34/33)
Dattoli - yeah he might not have pace but you know he’ll be in the thick of it. Plus we can afford to have one forward without pace just crumbing the front of packs and pressuring opposition. Got some tricks when he gets the footy.
Mraz - Still need a gorilla full back as a jones replacement. Seems to me that Croft if he becomes a backman would more likely be a Lobb replacement.
Busslinger more of a Jake Lever.
Like his competitiveness and tested great for his position. Agility in particular.
Who are others hoping for at each pick at this stage?
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
I never really liked player comparisonsFunny , I haven’t seen one bit of vision Hotton where I have thought wow another Shia Bolton .
Maybe size and build ?
But others will have seen way more of him, interested in their opinions ?
I'm not sure I'd take him at 35 anyway.
I don't see the hype
I'd rather see if we could trade 17 and F2 instead. The players I'd like are either gone by 17 or likely their at 25.There is talk that Richmond are open to offers, spreading their obscene riches into next year.
Next years draft apparently gets thin pretty quickly.
I'd happy if we offered something like 25+F1 for 11.
Getting a shot at somebody like a Xavier Lindsay holds a lot of appeal.
I'd try and make our four picks inside 50 turn into 5 somehowThere is talk that Richmond are open to offers, spreading their obscene riches into next year.
Next years draft apparently gets thin pretty quickly.
I'd happy if we offered something like 25+F1 for 11.
Getting a shot at somebody like a Xavier Lindsay holds a lot of appeal.
I don't mind bringing forward our F1 but I also don't want to add/lose 17 or 25.There is talk that Richmond are open to offers, spreading their obscene riches into next year.
Next years draft apparently gets thin pretty quickly.
I'd happy if we offered something like 25+F1 for 11.
Getting a shot at somebody like a Xavier Lindsay holds a lot of appeal.
This! I rather try and get another pick inside the top 25. Three picks in that range would easily give us three different type of players to cover our needs well.I don't mind bringing forward our F1 but I also don't want to add/lose 17 or 25.
If there are two players we really want still there at 15 or 16 we could try offer F1 to GWS for one.
If we could do 17 & F2 for 11, that would be a no brainer, but I expect Richmond would get a lot more. Around 17 (20-21) is full of KPPs that are worth a lot more to others than they are to us, but 11 could get us Lindsay.There is talk that Richmond are open to offers, spreading their obscene riches into next year.
Next years draft apparently gets thin pretty quickly.
I'd happy if we offered something like 25+F1 for 11.
Getting a shot at somebody like a Xavier Lindsay holds a lot of appeal.
If we could do 17 & F2 for 11, that would be a no brainer, but I expect Richmond would get a lot more. Around 17 (20-21) is full of KPPs that are worth a lot more to others than they are to us, but 11 could get us Lindsay.
Charlie Clarke didnt have a shred of the competitiveness that Dattoli has, not to mention the professionalism. Definitely similar stats and position in draft year but it was ultimately the lack of professionalism that saw Clarke delisted, not talent.Dattoli is basically Charlie Clarke with less flair. If we wouldn’t play Clarke then I don’t see the point in drafting Dattoli.
I think hes gone by our third pick. Tested 3rd overall for 2km. Clean skills, good kicking action, good size. Travelled 4hours one way to train and play. Clubs will see a lot of upside in a player like that. Would need to select at 25 imo. Could do much worse.Clarke I have around our third pick and would be a good pick up there.
We need people who cover plenty of ground in our forward half to help connect the play. If it were between these two I suspect we would pick Davis. My guess that it probably would have been reversed if we didn't get Matt Kennedy who Hynes seems quite similar to. There is nobody on our list that Davis is similar to.There were some rumours of our interest in Hynes a while ago.
As far as HFs who might become midfielders go, Davis vs Hynes is a hell of a debate. Davis has done it against men at WAFL level but Hynes seems a bit more 'burst'.
If tigers did accept F1 and 25 we could end up with Berry and Hannaford/Hotton. I find it hard to believe we would take Lindsay over Berry at 11 if we had it.I'd rather see if we could trade 17 and F2 instead. The players I'd like are either gone by 17 or likely their at 25.
I'm not sure you're aware you're posting on the Western Bulldogs forum.We have 33; 71 & 77. Would love to take Hynes if gets to 33 as I rate him much higher but seems this may be a chance. We need a developing Ruckman with only 2 out and out rucks on list so would love to get Harding at 71 and would either of the other Bushrangers boys Warburton or Murphy get through to 77.
We need people who cover plenty of ground in our forward half to help connect the play. If it were between these two I suspect we would pick Davis. My guess that it probably would have been reversed if we didn't get Matt Kennedy who Hynes seems quite similar to. There is nobody on our list that Davis is similar to.
If tigers did accept F1 and 25 we could end up with Berry and Hannaford/Hotton. I find it hard to believe we would take Lindsay over Berry at 11 if we had it.
Would love pick 11 in this draft.
Two potential fixes of a glaring list need for high quality, competitive ground ball players. Our list would be a lot more balanced moving forward then we could attack midfielders we scope with our later picks.