List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

[Ticky009]

 

[The King!]

As far as I know, Hogan's actions were mainly toxic to himself though? Stringer has a history of mistreating other people, which I think is much worse. From what I know, younger Hogan was a bad employee. Younger Stringer was just straight-up a bad human.

I'm not sure if there's been any issues publicised, but to be fair Dayne Beams' issues were kept pretty quiet at Brisbane until he requested a trade.

I think there's enough of a pattern of Stringer being a dickhead that I don't want him anywhere near our club.

Nah he's shit. Rather just keep Francis.

Well yep I just mean if we are going shopping in Essendons rubbish.

I'll take Caddy

 

[SSwans2011]

Well yep I just mean if we are going shopping in Essendons rubbish.

Shopping in Essendon's rubbish hey? I feel like a kid in a sewerage treatment facility.

 

[bedford]

Laverde is cheap and 28 maybe he will just be a clogger, but for cheap as a tall defender maybe?

We probably won't bring anyone from another club in as stated by KB

 

[The King!]

We probably won't bring anyone from another club in as stated by KB

Oh well this is hypothetical so we can bring in a purple dinosaur if we want.

 

[SSwans2011]

Oh well this is hypothetical so we can bring in a purple dinosaur if we want.

Better not be anything more than a one-year rookie contract. Well past his best.

He never recovered from this:

 

[bedford]

Oh well this is hypothetical so we can bring in a purple dinosaur if we want.

Rather that than that Stringer rat

 

[caesar88]

I'd have honestly much preferred us being linked to Mason Wood again

Very rare for players to return to their former clubs, but there are a few exceptions (Gary Ablett Jr., Jack Gunston, Eddie Betts), so even if Mason Wood hadn't just re-signed with St Kilda I don't think we'd have much chance.

 

[SSwans2011]

Very rare for players to return to their former clubs, but there are a few exceptions (Gary Ablett Jr., Jack Gunston, Eddie Betts), so even if Mason Wood hadn't just re-signed with St Kilda I don't think we'd have much chance.

Yeah but Wood's already tried to come home multiple times.

We all know he bleeds red and white. He's just a bit confused at the moment and yet to notice the lack of black blood.

 

[TheGoatBaron]

Prefer Tim Membrey

28

Tim Membrey

Age

30

Ht

188cm

Wt

92kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

12.2

3star

K

8.1

3star

HB

4.1

3star

M

5.8

5star

T

1.5

3star

G

1.8

5star

D

9.4

2star

K

6.5

3star

HB

2.9

2star

M

4.5

4star

T

1.3

2star

G

1.5

5star

D

9.6

3star

K

4.8

2star

HB

4.8

4star

M

3.2

4star

T

1.4

4star

G

0.6

3star

to come back to us then have Jake Stringer

25

Jake Stringer

Age

30

Ht

192cm

Wt

92kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

12.9

3star

K

8.5

3star

HB

4.4

3star

M

3.3

3star

T

2.5

4star

G

1.8

5star

D

8.5

2star

K

7.0

3star

HB

1.5

1star

M

2.8

3star

T

3.8

4star

G

2.5

5star

D

7.2

2star

K

4.8

2star

HB

2.4

3star

M

2.6

3star

T

1.4

4star

G

1.4

5star

. Just woke up from a nanna nap and read the news and thought I had woken up in a nightmare

 

[Caj]

I like it

Low cost high reward

Not sure why anyone thinks we’d need to lose Parker, he wouldn’t be on big money, he just wants the security of a multi year deal and would cost SFA in a trade

He’d be our highest goal kicker if we had him, but Luke comfortably kick 40+ on the SCG

 

[caesar88]

I just don't think he is that good , and isn't going to get better, lot of junk goals, realise most will disagree, but someone had to get the Dons goals

I'm pretty much here.

I think it's worth remembering that we are a well-run club that is out of the media spotlight and with relatively few media connections. We don't have all heroes, we're just better at tidying up the villainy than most clubs.

I would not be catatonic if we signed a dirtbag like Stringer, but their football ability would have to justify that moral exchange. Stringer, in my opinion, does not have that ability, and I'd be shocked if the club thought differently.

 

[The King!]

Better not be anything more than a one-year rookie contract. Well past his best.

He never recovered from this:

Poor with ground level ball, but he can tackle ok.

 

[SSwans2011]

Not sure why anyone thinks we’d need to lose Parker, he wouldn’t be on big money, he just wants the security of a multi year deal and would cost SFA in a trade

It's not the money, it's the fact that they'd be playing the exact same role.

 

[The King!]

I like it

Low cost high reward

Not sure why anyone thinks we’d need to lose Parker, he wouldn’t be on big money, he just wants the security of a multi year deal and would cost SFA in a trade

He’d be our highest goal kicker if we had him, but Luke comfortably kick 40+ on the SCG

It was more in the current 23 who comes out for Stringer ? Parker is the only one with some slight noise about going ,

Otherwise if we added Stringer to our list right now I personally wouldn't pick the piece of shit to play the Giants anyway. Especially with Paps etc back, he isn't even in our best side.

 

[Cadsky]

Oh well this is hypothetical so we can bring in a purple dinosaur if we want.

Supersuns welcome to the Swans I guess.

 

[sthmelb_dimmies]

Trading Stringer is straight out of the Barry Hall playbook and would violate the “no d!ckheads” policy. If that still exists.

 

[Punts]

he was top 20 inside 50 tackles this year

No swan better

Kicked more goals also than any swan

Ball walks from out 50 with the 3 talls

He also has break away speed from congestion that only 2 other players in the comp have in Warner and danger

 

[Superstar swan]

Hard pass on stringer

 

[Punts]

IMO he is an addition

Hope we get him

 

[The King!]

IMO he is an addition

Hope we get him

You hoped we would get adams last year too

 

[Punts]

You hoped we would get adams last year too

Yer I did

Thought he had some left

Very disappointing get

 

[ashep]

It was more in the current 23 who comes out for Stringer ? Parker is the only one with some slight noise about going ,

Otherwise if we added Stringer to our list right now I personally wouldn't pick the piece of shit to play the Giants anyway. Especially with Paps etc back, he isn't even in our best side.

You wouldn't play him in front of Amartey?

I wouldn't trade the farm for him but I think he'd bring a lot to our forward line. The mids have stepped up but it's not ideal leaning on them so heavily for our scoring.

 

[JackHiscoxWasFast]

You wouldn't play him in front of Amartey?

I wouldn't trade the farm for him but I think he'd bring a lot to our forward line. The mids have stepped up but it's not ideal leaning on them so heavily for our scoring.

Can we sign him up before Saturday so he can start ?

 

[SSwans2011]

You wouldn't play him in front of Amartey?

I wouldn't trade the farm for him but I think he'd bring a lot to our forward line. The mids have stepped up but it's not ideal leaning on them so heavily for our scoring.

I wouldn't. They play 2 different roles (Stringer would be more likely to replace Parker or Hayward and **** no to both of those) and as far as impact goes this season, I don't think there's been a huge difference.

Amartey is getting better every season while Stringer is getting worse.

Think Amartey has more upside at this point in their careers.

 

[SSwans2011]

I also don't get the argument that relying on the mids so much to score is a bad thing. I think it's a good thing. It means we have plenty of different avenues to goal, and lo and behold we were the highest scoring team this season.

This obsession with trying to change that set-up is just bizarre for mine.