List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

What should we get with our first two picks as they stand

  • Best Available for both

    Votes: 17 25.0%
  • Small forward/Small Defender

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • KPD/Small Forward

    Votes: 10 14.7%
  • Mid/KPD

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • KPD/Defender

    Votes: 18 26.5%
  • KPF/Small Forward

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • KPF/Mid

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • KPF/Defender

    Votes: 19 27.9%

  • Total voters
    68

Remove this Banner Ad

Future second feels like the max we could get.

0% for pick 25.

43 is a maybe depending if they need it after the Houston stuff.

61 is what they probably are keen to use…..

We will see

Only way we get 25 is if we send our third with Parker. Basically a pick upgrade
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Some here a bit naive on what Parker still has to offer IMO

Will be the same age at end of a 3 year deal as Rampe is now.
Age isn’t the only metric to consider. He’s got nearly two extra seasons of kms in the legs than Rampe, despite being a few years younger.

Is it age or usage that counts the most? (Probably a bit of both and varies from player to player.)
 
Some here a bit naive on what Parker still has to offer IMO

Will be the same age at end of a 3 year deal as Rampe is now.

Looks older when they play though, has had a harder footy life .

You reckon he is playing at a decent level in 2027, think this ends like Hanners at the saints unfortunately.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Parker and 58 for their F3 and 61?

On what planet is that near fair. A second has to be involved somewhere. Three junk picks we won’t use…what is the point of pick 58 we won’t use it. So basically you are saying a future third in a significantly worse draft…if we are offered that rather keep the bloke to his contract
 
Yes, they clearly underestimate him.

Definitely should be Parker for LDU …. that’d be a Luke for Luke swap.

They’d probably give us Luke McDonald for payback in giving them Stephens
 
Yep, because two decent ageing players that both clubs didn't want makes up for years of getting rid of the likes of Tom Mitchell, Aliir Aliir, Nankervis, Nic Newman, Darcy Cameron and Jordan Dawson for WELL below their market value.
Newman and Cameron were well within market value at that time.
 
On what planet is that near fair. A second has to be involved somewhere. Three junk picks we won’t use…what is the point of pick 58 we won’t use it. So basically you are saying a future third in a significantly worse draft…if we are offered that rather keep the bloke to his contract
The unknown factor is the size of the last year of Parker's contract and how keen the Swans are to get it off the books to use the money elsewhere? If North is helping us with salary cap pressure the pick won't be great, if it isn't sizeable we'll be pointing to the Pick 33 we paid for Adams and saying Parker is more valuable.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

Back
Top