List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

[Ticky009]

 

[LukeParkerno1]

He's cooked!

Still can play but wouldn’t give what the Tigers would want

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Future second feels like the max we could get.

0% for pick 25.

43 is a maybe depending if they need it after the Houston stuff.

61 is what they probably are keen to use…..

We will see

Only way we get 25 is if we send our third with Parker. Basically a pick upgrade

 

[The King!]

l]

A second is surely reasonable for both sides

No idea

 

[ashep]

Some here a bit naive on what Parker still has to offer IMO

Will be the same age at end of a 3 year deal as Rampe is now.

 

[Jimbo OZ]

Lower your expectations

 

[liz]

Some here a bit naive on what Parker still has to offer IMO

Will be the same age at end of a 3 year deal as Rampe is now.

Age isn’t the only metric to consider. He’s got nearly two extra seasons of kms in the legs than Rampe, despite being a few years younger.

Is it age or usage that counts the most? (Probably a bit of both and varies from player to player.)

 

[Punts]

Sheil and Stringer might be off to gws

Strengthens them abut imo

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Lower your expectations

Well we hope we aren’t pushovers again

 

[bedford]

Sheil and Stringer might be off to gws

Strengthens them abut imo

Will be and maybe Patton from saints

 

[bedford]

67 for Darling , we have to be lower now

 

[The King!]

Some here a bit naive on what Parker still has to offer IMO

Will be the same age at end of a 3 year deal as Rampe is now.

Looks older when they play though, has had a harder footy life .

You reckon he is playing at a decent level in 2027, think this ends like Hanners at the saints unfortunately.

 

[TheGoatBaron]

67 for Darling , we have to be lower now

Higher pick you mean?

 

[TheGoatBaron]

I always get confused lol

 

[Adnico26Parker]

Parker and 58 for their F3 and 61?

 

[Adnico26Parker]

Richmond are probably going to get a 2nd or end of 2nd compo pick for Graham to WC, so picks shuffle down again.

 

[Dubai Quacker]

Some here a bit naive on what Parker still has to offer IMO

Yes, they clearly underestimate him.

Definitely should be Parker for LDU …. that’d be a Luke for Luke swap.

 

[Ticky009]

Richmond are probably going to get a 2nd or end of 2nd compo pick for Graham to WC, so picks shuffle down again.

I really hate the Free Agency compo malarkey.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Parker and 58 for their F3 and 61?

On what planet is that near fair. A second has to be involved somewhere. Three junk picks we won’t use…what is the point of pick 58 we won’t use it. So basically you are saying a future third in a significantly worse draft…if we are offered that rather keep the bloke to his contract

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Yes, they clearly underestimate him.

Definitely should be Parker for LDU …. that’d be a Luke for Luke swap.

They’d probably give us Luke McDonald for payback in giving them Stephens

 

[bedford]

Unbeatable now LP1

 

[RUNVS]

Some here a bit naive on what Parker still has to offer IMO

Will be the same age at end of a 3 year deal as Rampe is now.

Parker in the forward line is still very dangerous. Very good one on one and a great kick for goal.

 

[Ticky009]

Yep, because two decent ageing players that both clubs didn't want makes up for years of getting rid of the likes of Tom Mitchell, Aliir Aliir, Nankervis, Nic Newman, Darcy Cameron and Jordan Dawson for WELL below their market value.

Newman and Cameron were well within market value at that time.

 

[Jimbo OZ]

We aren't getting a 2nd. Best to lower your expectations now. Instead we are freeing up significant salary space.

 

[ScottBo]

On what planet is that near fair. A second has to be involved somewhere. Three junk picks we won’t use…what is the point of pick 58 we won’t use it. So basically you are saying a future third in a significantly worse draft…if we are offered that rather keep the bloke to his contract

The unknown factor is the size of the last year of Parker's contract and how keen the Swans are to get it off the books to use the money elsewhere? If North is helping us with salary cap pressure the pick won't be great, if it isn't sizeable we'll be pointing to the Pick 33 we paid for Adams and saying Parker is more valuable.

 

[bedford]

The unknown factor is the size of the last year of Parker's contract and how keen the Swans are to get it off the books to use the money elsewhere? If North is helping us with salary cap pressure the pick won't be great, if it isn't sizeable we'll be pointing to the Pick 33 we paid for Adams and saying Parker is more valuable.

A couple of future picks i reckon , mid range