
So would I, but Haynes comes at no cost of draft picks.I would prefer him than Haynes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Melbourne - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 80% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
LIVE: Geelong v Melbourne - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 80% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
So would I, but Haynes comes at no cost of draft picks.I would prefer him than Haynes
As it sits currently 11 and if I’m Melbourne I’m assuming next years 1st is 18.
I think you’re missing the point here, B Camp is currently rated around pick 30, as things stand we won’t get to use this pick as it will be used to match.
By trading 31 and Owies for 22, we get ahead of the bid for Ben and bring in a highly rated kid.
Also a strong argument to suggest we could get 3 quality young players with those picks and prelong our window.We would trade next years 1st for one of GCS current 1st round picks (they'll be looking to gain an extra 1st next year) and change this year (a mid range pick they wont use, but we can use for points).
Say 13.
Then we bundle up our second, whatever we get for Martin, and whatever we get for Owies (ballpark another second) for another 1st (around the 15 mark)
11, 12 and 15 isnt exactly a bad offer on the table for a player that desperately wants out.
We're effectively out of the draft next year, and all in this year though.
It's a risk I'd take.
Tomlinison is a free agent and isn't offered a contractSo would I, but Haynes comes at no cost of draft picks.
Also a strong argument to suggest we could get 3 quality young players with those picks
It's actually annoying and distracting for the teams in finals. All the talk is about trades. It's garbage IMHO. We should be focusing on the finals.This trade period sounds like its going to be an absolute sh*tshow if all the rumours are anything to go off of
No way ...impossible without owiesWould this team win a flag?
Mcgovern Weitering Saad
Newman Aleer Docherty
Acres Cripps O.Hollands
Fogarty Mckay E.Hollands
Rosas Curnow Williams
Dekoning Petracca Walsh
Silvagni Cowan Cerra Boyd
l would back Austin & his team to find some players via the draft, pretty sure all players come via the draft, not sure the purpose of investing in a recruitment team if you are going to resort to the 80's model of recruiting by buying a premiership instead of building a team.Go back and look at our 1st round picks from the prior 20 years. Ignore the number 1's.
Outside of Cripps in 2013, and the 2015 Draft it's grim reading.
SPS, Dow, Stocker, Boekhoest, Yarran, Watson, Menzel, Lucas, Russell.
While the window is open, I'd rather take the proven player that gets us closer to a flag in that time.
At least if we get an injury Houston can come in as a somewhat proven replacement …Would this team win a flag?
Mcgovern Weitering Saad
Newman Aleer Docherty
Acres Cripps O.Hollands
Fogarty Mckay E.Hollands
Rosas Curnow Williams
Dekoning Petracca Walsh
Silvagni Cowan Cerra Boyd
Possibly, but with the introduction of trading picks for cap space, that might change
Trading non essential role players like Owies, Hewett/Kennedy and others and all the picks we can muster. Every day this Petracca fiasco goes on the less he's going to cost. The Dees are leaking defamatory stories about him, his team is leaking defamatory stories about them... He's gone.No way ...impossible without owies
Just having fun perhaps but how would you get trac and keep all our stars?
You talk depth but would get rid of Hewett or Kennedy please explainBecause Ross has been delisted so he would be free and on absolute minimum coin, Kennedy or Hewett are under contract so would hold some value in a trade and clear some cap space.
I'm not suggesting to do it btw... But its a perfectly reasonable idea. Offload Kennedy and Hewett for picks to help get Petracca and then bring in Ross as some extra depth... Wouldn't be the worst move I've seen suggested.
Yeah seems to be a lot going on and he may get to come at a reduced cost either as salary, draft picks or giving them players in return.Trading non essential role players like Owies, Hewett/Kennedy and others and all the picks we can muster. Every day this Petracca fiasco goes on the less he's going to cost. The Dees are leaking defamatory stories about him, his team is leaking defamatory stories about them... He's gone.
At this point if any more Demons request trades they're going to be forced into going through another scorched earth rebuild. Petracca, ANB, Pickett, Lever, May... It's going nuclear down at Demonland.
Not sure as to why we would get rid of Hewett or Kennedy to pick up a significantly worse (and older) player in Ross?
We have 1 too many midfielders in our best 22 already. Cripps, Walsh, Cerra, Hewett, Kennedy. When we're at full health 1 of these players is nearly always either - Forced to a flank, or forced to the VFL. We don't play all 5 on ball when they're all fit and healthy because theres not enough CBA's to go around and they are all very like for like players athletically.You talk depth but would get rid of Hewett or Kennedy please explain
Hw do you think it could look in this case? If we were to offer 2 1st round picks and it was enough, i dont see us being in a position to offer another 2nd or 3rd to reduce the salary as that would be getting in to the territory of taking points off the table and the chance of bringing in a kid in the 2nd or 3rd round.
You talk depth but would get rid of Hewett or Kennedy please explain
no footy this week will do that. they need something to talk aboutThis trade period sounds like its going to be an absolute sh*tshow if all the rumours are anything to go off of
You really think that getting rid of Kennedy and Hewett would make one iota of difference in terms of getting Petracca? We would be lucky to get a 3rd rounder for either. Kennedy is an unrestricted free agent having been delisted previously (afaik) and Hewett was reported to be on a 4 year deal at $400k per year. So you save maybe $650k and have to pay $200k - $250k for Ross. SO you are maybe $400K - $450K better off and maybe a couple of third rounders.
Peracca is allegedly on a minimum of $1.2 mill and a maximum of $1.7mill per year for the next five years. Even if he takes a fairly big haircut you'd be still a long, long way short. And risk rupturing the fabric of the team with two heart and soul tough players shown the door.
Clearly we would need some Melbourne Storm like accounting to fit Petracca under our salary cap as it currently stands. I appreciate your logic but taking on finished players like Seb Ross would be a no for me.