List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Something tells me it just doesn't work and we'll bleed players. I think the margin for error list wise strangely becomes very thin.

I'm not going to be upset if it somehow happens but something just feels off on it. Too many head chefs, not enough cooks (or something like that)



I've read the tea leaves and Reidy will play the first few games in 2025 and play really well then Darcy will come back into the side then request a trade back to Victoria after winning a Premiership at Freo and we'll use that collateral for Warner.
 
Something tells me it just doesn't work and we'll bleed players. I think the margin for error list wise strangely becomes very thin.

I'm not going to be upset if it somehow happens but something just feels off on it. Too many head chefs, not enough cooks (or something like that)

Replace chefs with competent players and have another go 😂
 
Controversial but I'll go as far as saying I actively don't won't Warner if we get Bolton and Pickett. Too much overlap with Bolton, not enough defending all around the ground.
Draft picks and wage cap far better focussed on replacement for pearce and even ryan.
 
Controversial but I'll go as far as saying I actively don't won't Warner if we get Bolton and Pickett. Too much overlap with Bolton, not enough defending all around the ground.
Yes, missing Chad is palatable if we have Bolton. Possibly even a good idea.

Still, it's hard not to want good players when they are available.
 
Yes, missing Chad is palatable if we have Bolton. Possibly even a good idea.

Still, it's hard not to want good players when they are available.
Warner would still be possible next year it just becomes more difficult. With all the big names we've been chasing who would be coming on big money I reckon our cap space is fine.
 
Yes, missing Chad is palatable if we have Bolton. Possibly even a good idea.

Still, it's hard not to want good players when they are available.
Yeah, I actually think Chad and Bolton are basically the same player but if you get both, you just play Warner more on ball and Bolton more up forward. Getting Pickett changes it though.

Still, you'd look a bit silly actively turning away Chad Warner. I dont know, basically I wont be upset whatever happens with Warner if we get these two
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yes, missing Chad is palatable if we have Bolton. Possibly even a good idea.

Still, it's hard not to want good players when they are available.

Yeah, I actually think Chad and Bolton are basically the same player but if you get both, you just play Warner more on ball and Bolton more up forward. Getting Pickett changes it though.

Still, you'd look a bit silly actively turning away Chad Warner. I dont know, basically I wont be upset whatever happens with Warner if we get these two

I wonder if getting Baker compliments Bolton and Pickett more than Warner.

People always say he is brilliant defensively, and doing the one percenters, and provides great leadership.

I think he would be good and getting everyone focused and thinking about the big picture as well.

Of course, you only look at him after the first 2 are through the door.
 
Yeah, I actually think Chad and Bolton are basically the same player but if you get both, you just play Warner more on ball and Bolton more up forward. Getting Pickett changes it though.

Still, you'd look a bit silly actively turning away Chad Warner. I dont know, basically I wont be upset whatever happens with Warner if we get these two

We get those two Warner will be gagging to come here.

West Coast should be out of the picture, and would probably prefer it tbh..they need every draft until Tassie to be a winner.
They need mids, wingers, Key backs and rucks.
We also have those three NGA kids to keep us in the draft
 
I wonder if getting Baker compliments Bolton and Pickett more than Warner.

People always say he is brilliant defensively, and doing the one percenters, and provides great leadership.

I think he would be good and getting everyone focused and thinking about the big picture as well.

Of course, you only look at him after the first 2 are through the door.
He clearly wants Meth Coast. We are a reluctant back up plan. He should of picked us by now. Fck him. I hope they do something dumb like split pick 3 to get him. Would almost be as good as us getting Pickett and Bolton.
 
Did you get to keep any of those fancy reacts after you retired from being a mod? I say we revoke those privileges if he ends up somewhere else now, you've given innocent people like me expectations
I get to keep my litter react right?
 
He clearly wants Meth Coast. We are a reluctant back up plan. He should of picked us by now. Fck him. I hope they do something dumb like split pick 3 to get him. Would almost be as good as us getting Pickett and Bolton.
Split three or send the main pick from Barrass for him. Even Ellis will explode, hell, I'd almost march on Min Res for them
 
I wonder if getting Baker compliments Bolton and Pickett more than Warner.

People always say he is brilliant defensively, and doing the one percenters, and provides great leadership.

I think he would be good and getting everyone focused and thinking about the big picture as well.

Of course, you only look at him after the first 2 are through the door.
He definitely identifies as a cook rather than chef so I'd agree but all three seems lunacy is one offseason
 
I've read the tea leaves and Reidy will play the first few games in 2025 and play really well then Darcy will come back into the side then request a trade back to Victoria after winning a Premiership at Freo and we'll use that collateral for Warner.
Why would we trade a premiership winning No.1 ruck by choice?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top