List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fair chance everyone in that list is gone.
Emmett & Reidy should be kept. I'd keep Kuek too unless we want to draft another KPF late but they will take years to build up their body. Why turnover 9 players when we are only getting in 3-4 current AFL players and probably only 2 best 22?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Emmett & Reidy should be kept. I'd keep Kuek too unless we want to draft another KPF late but they will take years to build up their body. Why turnover 9 players when we are only getting in 3-4 AFL bodies and probably only 2 best 22?
I don't disagree. I just think a case could be made for and against everyone there. And wouldn't be surprised to see them all moved on.
 
Emmett & Reidy should be kept. I'd keep Kuek too unless we want to draft another KPF late but they will take years to build up their body. Why turnover 9 players when we are only getting in 3-4 AFL bodies and probably only 2 best 22?
Those are basically the only names to cut. Corbett has his replacement on the list already, Williams doesn't count as Cat B, we are trading in at least 2.players you'd think. Suddenly that just 5 spots for the draft...
 
Everything I've heard suggests he loves WA but really, all this list talk shows it would be good if we can find someone to take Brodie.
We can gift him to West Coast.
 
Bahaha. Never heard anyone say that before. What the heck is a low floor?
Ok, now I'm questioning myself :think:

To me it's his developmental upside is really good, but his worst is pretty bad.

A few of those games for Peel last year were diabolical. It seems if his body isn't in mint condition his entire game suffers, to the point he looks totally lost as a footballer.
 
Is he available tho? might want to stay in perth
Was more around, he's shown he's capable, the development is on track.

We can offer him cents on the dollar.

North could give him a lot more. Especially if they want to give up cap space for Darling.

Good on him for signing on, Want him to stay, but surely he'd be an option for a few clubs back home.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It hurts as a Stanley truther but literally all those names should go, well, at least, I agree with Chris25 very well made points that we should take at least 5 picks in this draft if we can.

If we move a few off the rookie list, then he could maybe stay/move to our rookie list for one year.

I think the rest of the players are on the main list (but I can't find a complete list to confirm)

So that leaves us 6 spots on main list, and 1 rookie. (There is probably one more rookie)

Ethan Hughes
Tom Emmett
Josh Corbett - spot already used by voss.
Matt Taberner
Odin Jones
Liam Reidy - Rookie
Sebit Kuek
Ethan Stanley


Conrad Williams - Cat B


So maybe

Bolton in
5 picks in ND
Winder on to the rookie list
Irishman as a Cat B
 
Those are basically the only names to cut. Corbett has his replacement on the list already, Williams doesn't count as Cat B, we are trading in at least 2.players you'd think. Suddenly that just 5 spots for the draft...
5 spots is not much if we weren't trading for 1-2 A graders. We will end up with only 1 pick in the first two rounds anyway after trade week so I recon 3-4 is plenty at our position. We should have a decent amount turn over next year too.
 
If we move a few off the rookie list, then he could maybe stay/move to our rookie list for one year.

I think the rest of the players are on the main list (but I can't find a complete list to confirm)

So that leaves us 6 spots on main list, and 1 rookie. (There is probably one more rookie)

Ethan Hughes
Tom Emmett
Josh Corbett - spot already used by voss.
Matt Taberner
Odin Jones
Liam Reidy - Rookie
Sebit Kuek
Ethan Stanley


Conrad Williams - Cat B
Rookie and main list is the same thing to me these days and don't forget the players we trade in
 
Was more around, he's shown he's capable, the development is on track.

We can offer him cents on the dollar.

North could give him a lot more. Especially if they want to give up cap space for Darling.

Good on him for signing on, Want him to stay, but surely he'd be an option for a few clubs back home.
maybe north get darling in for experience? they have brought many players in from other clubs that haven't work.

Voss is a handy back up but not a world beater
 
maybe north get darling in for experience? they have brought many players in from other clubs that haven't work.

Voss is a handy back up but not a world beater
I feel sorry for North, even with Clarko they can't attract any players. Darling would have to be bottom of the barrel for senior leadership or on field effort and here they are ready to pay him 600K pa.
 
I really think we should be keeping Emmett tbh. He's decent depth already and young enough to get much better.

Plus its a bit sh** to delist a second year player who's still young and played a lot of games this year.

Having said all that all depends on how many list spots and decent draft selections we have available once trade week is over.
 
I really think we should be keeping Emmett tbh. He's decent depth already and young enough to get much better.

Plus its a bit sh** to delist a second year player who's still young and played a lot of games this year.

Having said all that all depends on how many list spots and decent draft selections we have available once trade week is over.
Realistically, they keep Jones as well because we arent carrying only 3 ruck options on the list given our history. Makes it even harder for Emmett.

I think all signs point to losing at least 1 player not in those names to trade this year
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top