List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets Part 2

[Lach72]

Pardon the intrusion.

Is there a consensus on whether Freo would be prepared to make a serious bid on North's F1? Allowing you to get Warner next year, and for us to offer Port 2024 picks for Houston?

10 for your future first.
we can then use that for Bolton and keep 9 and everything else

 

[Cobbler]

Pardon the intrusion.

Is there a consensus on whether Freo would be prepared to make a serious bid on North's F1? Allowing you to get Warner next year, and for us to offer Port 2024 picks for Houston?

It’s been mentioned.

F1 for 10?

I’m unsure why we would feel the need to do it. It would just mean giving more for Chad when he’s out of contract. If there was a belief he would go to either club? Then perhaps, so we could compete with their offer, but usually the player picks the team.

Maybe we could do the work now for Pickett and will need the assets to complete both deals.

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

Pardon the intrusion.

Is there a consensus on whether Freo would be prepared to make a serious bid on North's F1? Allowing you to get Warner next year, and for us to offer Port 2024 picks for Houston?

To sum up

• Some on here are open to it for the pure value gain. I imagine it's less Freo bidding and more North bidding for pick 9 or 10. Would be minimum straight swap IMO.
• Most (including me) are 100% dead against moving stuff to next for Warner since no other club ever does that.
• Freo would probably be open to it because we like doing stupid things.

 

[Makeshift Park]

To sum up

• Some on here are open to it for the pure value gain. I imagine it's less Freo bidding and more North bidding for pick 9 or 10. Would be minimum straight swap IMO.
• Most (including me) are 100% dead against moving stuff to next for Warner since no other club ever does that.
• Freo would probably be open to it because we like doing stupid things.

Thank you for your fair and balanced summary good sir.

 

[Cobbler]

To sum up

• Some on here are open to it for the pure value gain. I imagine it's less Freo bidding and more North bidding for pick 9 or 10. Would be minimum straight swap IMO.
• Most (including me) are 100% dead against moving stuff to next for Warner since no other club ever does that.
• Freo would probably be open to it because we like doing stupid things.

I don’t think it’s stupid, necessarily. It just provides flexibility for Pickett or anyone else that may want in.

Yes, if we do the F1 thing with North to then just give Swans 2 firsts, then we are beyond dumb.

 

[Taylor]

It would be something special to trade #10 to North for their F1 and #22

 

[Taylor]

If the market value North's future 1st as a top five pick and they'll give us that for our pick #10 then we can scrape extra value out of them in other trades.

#10 straight from us to Melbourne for Pickett but Melbourne see it as pick #4 for Pickett, and we also have a #22 on top of that.

 

[Cobbler]

It would be something special to trade #10 to North for their F1 and #22

That would be special, but Port would just accept a F1 if that was the case.

 

[FreoBraddles]

Get fckkkkkd

 

[freo_leo29]

**** BAND 1

GET ****ED

 

[freo84]

Get fckkkkkd

It's okay, they'll miss with that pick.

Then blame the system again.

 

[Taylor]

So we have pick #10 and #11 now.

 

[Azz 27]

Get fckkkkkd

I can't help but feel the AFL decided the outcome based on wanting St Kilda to improve.



I expect GWS will get a 1st rounder for Perryman as well then.
So 10, 11 and 18.

 

[Taylor]

That would be special, but Port would just accept a F1 if that was the case.

They might be pretty desperate to get a first round pick this draft given they haven't had one for so long.

 

[freo_leo29]

Now we've got to listen to Richmond supporters whinge and cry about pick 10 for 2 weeks

 

[dont bowl there]

Get fckkkkkd

HAHAHA the AFL is ****ing cooked. How anyone thinks free agency compensation is a good thing is beyond me. Absolute joke of a competition when you have top ten picks diluted by Father/Son, Academy AND free agency.

 

[Fat Nyfe]

St Kilda getting band 1 compo for Battle is a joke. The AFL's free agency compo system is broken, not that that is a surprise to anyone.

 

[Cobbler]

They might be pretty desperate to get a first round pick this draft given they haven't had one for so long.

Yes, but they could do that themselves once they have the F1

 

[Moist Biscuit]

Pick 8 for Battle is flipping terrible, good solid player but nobody is giving up pick 8 for him.

 

[Cobbler]

So… looks like Tigers won’t get a top 10 pick! Haha

 

[The Feeder Club]

Get fckkkkkd

Their Pres getting up and having a whinge about the unfairness of the AFL paid off in spades

 

[Taylor]

Yes, but they could do that themselves once they have the F1

Port could also want to stuff around North so they have to go do all the work if they want to poach their contracted player.

You'd think they would be above this, but they aren't.

 

[Fat Nyfe]

HAHAHA the AFL is ****ing cooked. How anyone thinks free agency compensation is a good thing is beyond me. Absolute joke of a competition when you have top ten picks diluted by Father/Son, Academy AND free agency.

It would be contentious diluting the draft even with superstars moving, but picks 3 and 8 have been handed out in consecutive years for bog average journeymen defenders Ben McKay and Josh Battle. Amateur league.

 

[Taylor]

I look at the free agency compensation as AFL helping out the poor teams with bonus sweet picks instead of giving priority picks to the same clubs for being rubbish.

 

[Rob]

It would be something special to trade #10 to North for their F1 and #22

They would have to be completely off their rocker to agree to that.