Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Neither are all that. McDonald isn’t worth two firsts or even close to it, and Treacy would be steak knives in any trade. Turn your attention elsewhere.
Why didn’t we try and get some game time into Wagner (also Walker). I know they anre underdone a little but Wagner/Walker would have been better than a few others (ie Hughes/Worner). Wagner in particular was critical to our improvement late last year. At least incl. him in the 26 for a run around sometime in the 3rd as replacement for Worner.
Sturt and JOM played horrible games. Getting Erasmus on earlier and seeing how he goes at half forward would have been worthwhile.
I’d take McDonald and then look for and line breaking midfielders and an elite small forward
We have 3 firsts and and a 2nd.
Logan takes 2 firsts surely. I would rather use all 4 pucks on line breaking mids and small forwards, and add Zurhaar.
Unless we can get the ball from defence to attack, Logan won't make a Difference.
You need strong targets to kick to. Logan is on par with Amiss and we know how much better the team is with Amiss in it.
We use two firsts on Logan and get Zurhar as a free agent.
Freo will still have a first from this year and next to go to drsft or try lure an outside mid with elite pace and precise kicking with the other two firsts and then our rebuild will be almost complete
We have 3 firsts and and a 2nd.
Logan takes 2 firsts surely. I would rather use all 4 pucks on line breaking mids and small forwards, and add Zurhaar.
Unless we can get the ball from defence to attack, Logan won't make a Difference.
Yeah before last night I would have said no to McDonald and instead go to the draft. I was that big of a fan of Treacy and Sturt.We have 4 firsts (3 this year and one next) and a second to use. McDonald takes two firsts
Our list is young enough. Take McDonald.
If Zurhaar is interested take him as an FA and punt Sturt or Treacy or both.
Then use the other two firsts (this year’s that is left) and trade next years into this year and take the best small forward and best one breaking midfielder we can get our hands on.
We need players now and we need to consolidate this list
We have 4 firsts (3 this year and one next) and a second to use. McDonald takes two firsts
Our list is young enough. Take McDonald.
If Zurhaar is interested take him as an FA and punt Sturt or Treacy or both.
Then use the other two firsts (this year’s that is left) and trade next years into this year and take the best small forward and best one breaking midfielder we can get our hands on.
We need players now and we need to consolidate this list
We have 4 firsts (3 this year and one next) and a second to use. McDonald takes two firsts
Our list is young enough. Take McDonald.
If Zurhaar is interested take him as an FA and punt Sturt or Treacy or both.
Then use the other two firsts (this year’s that is left) and trade next years into this year and take the best small forward and best one breaking midfielder we can get our hands on.
We need players now and we need to consolidate this list
I understand what you are saying, I guess the question is which one helps more, McDonald or another small forward and line breaking mid ?
I expect we will finish bottom 8 again, so we are talking pick 6-8 and pick 20 for McDonald. (Pick 8 may be enough, if his form does not improve this year)
I don't see a lot of quick forwards in the mock draft, it is mind blowing we did not trade a future first for Collard.
I’ve been a “buyer of Sturt stock” since we drafted him and especially after his debut against the bombers. I even have a running bet with my cousin (whether he makes 50 games). I am losing faith fast though. There is a player there but the footy nous might never come. A few weeks ago in some interview or another he mentioned the coaches telling him to use his pace more and he basically said “he hadn’t really thought of himself as someone with pace”. I’m pretty sure he run a 2.92 20 metre sprint as the draft trials, so how do you not know you have pace??It is just a preseason but Sturt is starting to concern me. How we have failed to prioritise forwards in the draft is absurd. Idk if it's Walzy or the club but it's quite arrogant.
Not just forwards, but quick line breaking mids as well.It is just a preseason but Sturt is starting to concern me. How we have failed to prioritise forwards in the draft is absurd. Idk if it's Walzy or the club but it's quite arrogant.
Don't get me startedSome point I might go back to 2016 and try to understand how I feel like we’ve drafted really well but somehow came out of the rebuild with only Jackson and Amiss who I would consider potential top 10 players. Port just smashed it with Rozee and Butters and they got lucky with JHF like we did with Jackson.
That 2018 draft / trade will go down in infamy for us
All the talk that year was Hill, but weI’ve been a “buyer of Sturt stock” since we drafted him and especially after his debut against the bombers. I even have a running bet with my cousin (whether he makes 50 games). I am losing faith fast though. There is a player there but the footy nous might never come. A few weeks ago in some interview or another he mentioned the coaches telling him to use his pace more and he basically said “he hadn’t really thought of himself as someone with pace”. I’m pretty sure he run a 2.92 20 metre sprint as the draft trials, so how do you not know you have pace??
That 2018 trade period actually netted a swag of quality players that contributed since (maybe just not for us and/or long term).Some point I might go back to 2016 and try to understand how I feel like we’ve drafted really well but somehow came out of the rebuild with only Jackson and Amiss who I would consider potential top 10 players. Port just smashed it with Rozee and Butters and they got lucky with JHF like we did with Jackson.
That 2018 draft / trade will go down in infamy for us
Forwards I can cop, albeit Schultz decision and Henry development exposed us a bit there.Not just forwards, but quick line breaking mids as well.
It is concerning
2016 got Cox, Darcy and RyanThat 2018 trade period actually netted a swag of quality players that contributed since (maybe just not for us and/or long term).
2016 was much worse.
But win some/lose some is what you need to apply to trades.
How we develop and utilise our talent is something we can look at and have some real control over and mitigate the arrivals that don't turn out.
You’ll have to explain this one to me, 2018 we have missed out on a very good chance to get one or two elite young players and instead currently have Sturt…That 2018 trade period actually netted a swag of quality players that contributed since (maybe just not for us and/or long term).
2016 was much worse.
But win some/lose some is what you need to apply to trades.
How we develop and utilise our talent is something we can look at and have some real control over and mitigate the arrivals that don't turn out.
I’ll never agree with you on the fully draft approach. Every team recruits during a rebuild and the picks on Wilson, Hamling and Matera were fine. Kersten was a spud but the pick is meaningless. The high end picks were the problem (never use high end picks on anything but the draft when rebuilding), we just refused to believe we needed a rebuildDon't get me started
Matera, Lobb, Hogan, Wilson, Kersten, Hamling were all great recruits for a rebuilding team.
In reality our drafting has been good, but we wasted 2 top 10 picks, 2 2nds, 2 3rds (2 years draft capital) for nothing in return
That's draft, not trades. Trade was specified and central to my point.2016 got Cox, Darcy and Ryan
3 key pillars of our rebuild
Everyone we got in 2018 left except for Sturt + we lost Neale in that same off season, 2018 has turned into a disaster, even if Sturt finds form, we still only get 1 player out of it