List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets

[King Huskii]

Yeah we might sign Sturt but why the rush for spud banners and no rush for Sturt

 

[Spirit Level]

With Banners , the correlation between his drop in form is changed role to the start of year. Reverting to playing predominantly in fwd line or very little stints on the wing.

Hope he builds his tank more so he is given more wing time next year if he stays

Playing predominantly deep fwd or third tall is not it. Not kicking goals recently playing fwd adds to his frustration

He's a limited footballer who had a purple patch in a contract year.

Should only be playing WAFL from now in if we're serious.

Ripping bloke though

 

[s_wd6]

Yeah we might sign Sturt but why the rush for spud banners and no rush for Sturt

Cos spud banners but together really good form for the first half of the year that resulted in an extension bc he’s a DFA. It’s not like we presented him with a contract right after this game

 

[Stinky Lomax]

Yeah we might sign Sturt but why the rush for spud banners and no rush for Sturt

Pretty sure they work on multiple contracts at one time.

Don’t think they’ve gone, great Banners & Voss locked in, now can someone call Sturt?

 

[Footskill]

Maybe Sturts the one stalling in signing..

He is saying show me the Treacy money or homesick ..who knows what happens bts

 

[Cobbler]

Sturt - could be further triggers? Incentives? He’ll clearly be offered a contract.

 

[Swiggy]

Jay Clark on mid week tackle just said freo are after Joe Richards from Collingwood ( port are too )

 

[s_wd6]

Jay Clark on mid week tackle just said freo are after Joe Richards from Collingwood ( port are too )

I want him. But Port have offered him 4 years so look like the front runners.

 

[Docker82]

I want him. But Port have offered him 4 years so look like the front runners.

Not sure he’s quite shown enough to get that tbh.

He’s not some 20 year old kid so you’d want to make sure he’s best 22 if he comes for four years. I mean he probably is but he’s not exactly an A grader is he?

 

[Swiggy]

I want him. But Port have offered him 4 years so look like the front runners.

I haven’t watched much of him, you obviously rate him?

 

[malpaso]

Not sure he’s quite shown enough to get that tbh.

He’s not some 20 year old kid so you’d want to make sure he’s best 22 if he comes for four years. I mean he probably is but he’s not exactly an A grader is he?

He's quite good and ripped us a new one this year.

 

[Swiggy]

Not sure he’s quite shown enough to get that tbh.

He’s not some 20 year old kid so you’d want to make sure he’s best 22 if he comes for four years. I mean he probably is but he’s not exactly an A grader is he?

Unfortunately not everyone freo will bring in will be A graders

 

[gaskin]

We don't need everyone we bring in to be A-Graders. We need them to be better than who they are replacing.

 

[chaosball32]

Bolton is exactly what we need. Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves.

A genuine small forward with great crumbing ability and good goal sense. Added bonus that he’s great overhead, loves a specky. Only needs an inch and can make something special happen. But what really stands out is his confidence in his own ability, he’s not scared to shoulder the responsibility and have a shot at goal unlike some of our other players.

Could work on the defensive side of his game, in particular his pressure and his tackling. But his positives far outweigh his negatives.

He’d easily be our best small forward. If he was on our list this year we’d be top 4 no question. When you’re coming into your window, these are the types of players you need to make big plays for.

It’s only a matter of price. Not worth three 1sts alone, but with Rioli and Baker likely leaving also, and pick 1 basically sewn up, Richmond will be stacked with high end picks this year regardless. We’ll definitely be able to negotiate down.

 

[Van_Dyke]

ridiculous player management from adelaide

 

[go_the_dockers]

Jay Clark on mid week tackle just said freo are after Joe Richards from Collingwood ( port are too )

Credit to port. When like a player they go all in.

 

[s_wd6]

I haven’t watched much of him, you obviously rate him?

No idea never watched him. I just like the idea of stealing a small forward from Collingwood who ends up being so much better than Schultz

 

[Joao]

If he's fast, tackles and has some basic skills he's probably worth a look.

 

[ROGS]

No idea never watched him. I just like the idea of stealing a small forward from Collingwood who ends up being so much better than Schultz

why dont we rock the boat and go after Daniels from GWS , offer him a big contract that is overs

just the type of busy small forward we need

 

[yakamoto]

Suffered the pain of watching most of the Ist 1/4 again. I was wrong.It was Draper trailing Hogan for the first goal. Closely but not close enough enough to effect a spoil.
After that it seemed to be Cox on Hogan. Did some good stuff plus the stupid 50.

 

[Docker82]

Can’t be bothered quoting everyone that replied to my post but I wouldn’t have too much of an issue bringing Richards in - it’s just the four contract I find a little bit too much.

And yes not everyone needs to be an A Grader but I’m not sure you give out a four year contract to an opposition player unless you think that’s what you think you’re getting.

 

[Docker82]

ridiculous player management from adelaide

Got to say there seems to be a few players at that club that I would’ve thought would be better players than they are. Some have even gone backwards.

 

[apuchar]

He has

 

[Joao]

Can’t be bothered quoting everyone that replied to my post but I wouldn’t have too much of an issue bringing Richards in - it’s just the four contract I find a little bit too much.

And yes not everyone needs to be an A Grader but I’m not sure you give out a four year contract to an opposition player unless you think that’s what you think you’re getting.

Agree 4 is too long. Let that one through to Port I think.

 

[Ge3ks]

Just saw this. Excellent for Voss. Dunno if it was discussed earlier today.