List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets Part 2

[Outshined]

That doesn’t happen anymore it’s 2024 not 2004

Maybe not a zero hour contract but I hear Visy are short of "part-time" environmental ambassadors.

 

[Paracleet]

Tabs is completely cooked as a AFL player. His back is f$cked and he barely gets out of the square in WAFL matches. Any competent list team should be able to see he's simply not capable of an AFL training regime anymore.
Still I suppose it could happen though. Hamling was clearly done and the Swans took him anyway and ended up having to play key forwards back in front of him.

 

[Dockeroo]

Because whatever the stance is on the deal, it's already been largely agreed to.

We don't need to play it out in the media.

I guess we will judge both trades on their merits then.
For me there wouldn’t be much difference between the value of Dan Houston, a 2 time AA gun that’s probably the best half back in the AFL, and Bolton a mercurial mid/forward that has one AA award.

So we shouldn’t be paying double for Bolton, what Carlton might pay for Houston. Or anywhere near it

 

[DragoDelph]

I guess we will judge both trades on their merits then.
For me there wouldn’t be much difference between the value of Dan Houston, a 2 time AA gun that’s probably the best half back in the AFL, and Bolton a mercurial mid/forward that has one AA award.

So we shouldn’t be paying double for Bolton, what Carlton might pay for Houston. Or anywhere near it

I think the blues will still pay 2x firsts for Houston. They just also want to keep pick 11.

Won't happen without losing someone you wouldn't think.

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

I guess we will judge both trades on their merits then.
For me there wouldn’t be much difference between the value of Dan Houston, a 2 time AA gun that’s probably the best half back in the AFL, and Bolton a mercurial mid/forward that has one AA award.

So we shouldn’t be paying double for Bolton, what Carlton might pay for Houston. Or anywhere near it

If Carlton aren't giving up 11, they are trading someone good to get the picks Port want. Also, the media are generally laughing at the idea they get to keep 11. Wouldn't worry until final reault tbh.

Port aren't trading him there for less than two late firsts or a top 10 pick IMO

 

[DragoDelph]

Just feels like this is about to be a bonkers off season.
Do we think all the pieces are known yet?

 

[Taylor]

That doesn’t happen anymore it’s 2024 not 2004

It's happening. Only a couple of years ago half of Carlton's list were on Visy's books.

 

[DragoDelph]

It's happening. Only a couple of years ago half of Carlton's list were on Visy's books.

How many $150k part time admin jobs for family they have left?

 

[s_wd6]

Just feels like this is about to be a bonkers off season.
Do we think all the pieces are known yet?

Nah, we’ve still got a big trade request from us coming.

 

[DragoDelph]

Nah, we’ve still got a big trade request from us coming.

Perfect.

 

[DragoDelph]

Can I pre-delete posts?

Like minority report the board?

 

[Taylor]

How many $150k part time admin jobs for family they have left?

As many as it takes.

 

[theGav56]

I have question marks about the role of a couple of players I see as likely best 22, especially:

• Frederick: if we bolster our forward like with Bolton and Martin, plus with Sturt emerging, can he becomes a wing?
• O'Driscoll: he could go back to the wing, but he seems to have potential on ball to bring something different.
• Chapman/Draper: they have flexibility, but if our defence is at full strength I find it difficult to include both there. Can Chapman find a role elsewhere?

That group all have qualities which brings points of difference and also create attacking threats for us. As we weaponise our game I want them to feature.

 

[apuchar]

I have question marks about the role of a couple of players I see as likely best 22, especially:

• Frederick: if we bolster our forward like with Bolton and Martin, plus with Sturt emerging, can he becomes a wing?
• O'Driscoll: he could go back to the wing, but he seems to have potential on ball to bring something different.
• Chapman/Draper: they have flexibility, but if our defence is at full strength I find it difficult to include both there. Can Chapman find a role elsewhere?

That group all have qualities which brings points of difference and also create attacking threats for us. As we weaponise our game I want them to feature.

Yes

 

[Taylor]

In the spirit of players with a couple of years of contract requesting a trade, excluding those who recently extended, which of these players will be asking to leave?

Jaeger O'Meara

2

Jaeger O'meara

Age

30

Ht

184cm

Wt

84kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

22.9

5star

K

12.4

5star

HB

10.6

5star

M

3.7

4star

T

5.5

5star

CL

4.8

5star

D

20.9

5star

K

13.0

5star

HB

7.9

4star

M

3.6

4star

T

4.0

5star

CL

5.0

5star

D

19.4

5star

K

11.4

4star

HB

8.0

5star

M

4.0

4star

T

4.0

5star

CL

4.6

5star

Will Brodie

17

Will Brodie

Age

26

Ht

190cm

Wt

89kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

19.0

5star

K

8.2

3star

HB

10.8

5star

M

3.1

3star

T

4.9

5star

CL

4.1

5star

D

14.0

3star

K

4.0

1star

HB

10.0

5star

M

3.0

3star

T

1.0

2star

CL

3.0

4star

D

13.8

4star

K

7.4

3star

HB

6.4

4star

M

3.2

4star

T

5.4

5star

CL

2.8

5star

Michael Frederick
Sam Switkowski

39

Sam Switkowski

Age

27

Ht

179cm

Wt

74kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

11.8

3star

K

5.3

2star

HB

6.5

4star

M

2.7

3star

T

4.8

5star

G

0.4

3star

No current season stats available

D

13.4

4star

K

7.2

3star

HB

6.2

4star

M

3.0

3star

T

4.0

5star

G

0.4

3star

Matthew Johnson

 

[apuchar]

Doubt Jom would have any takers. Will probably would if he could. Michael's brother is here now so probably not. Sam looks like he has backed away but things could change. Johnson wanted to leave Perth so may be a possibility.

 

[pK75]

Doubt Jom would have any takers. Will probably would if he could. Michael's brother is here now so probably not. Sam looks like he has backed away but things could change. Johnson wanted to leave Perth so may be a possibility.

Johnson wanted to leave Perth. When did this happen, I thought him sliding was partly because eastern states team thought he was a flight risk?

 

[s_wd6]

In the spirit of players with a couple of years of contract requesting a trade, excluding those who recently extended, which of these players will be asking to leave?

Jaeger O'Meara
Will Brodie
Michael Frederick
Sam Switkowski
Matthew Johnson

First one hopefully

 

[s_wd6]

Johnson wanted to leave Perth. When did this happen, I thought him sliding was partly because eastern states team thought he was a flight risk?

He did a poddy in his draft year with a mate? (or someone not too official) and mentioned that he kinda wanted to move away from home. The talk of him sliding because flight risk was made up.

 

[Retzlaff]

Doesn't say who, but would be happy for him.

Melbourne wouldn't if they get Membrey?
Reunite with Ross at the Saints?

West Coast might be looking to top up

 

[Catalpa]

Hamling was clearly done and the Swans took him anyway and ended up having to play key forwards back in front of him.

Was Hamling done? He would have been valuable for us this year as a key back at the cost of games into Draper. Hopefully McDonald gets a full year as depth or Hugh Davies really steps up, without his hat.

 

[anchor man]

West Coast might be looking to top up

He is a step up or more than Jack. And he doesn't need anyone to turn the lights on.

 

[Serongadongdong]

West Coast might be looking to top up

Talk over in the East today was Pies and Dees potential suitors.

The game has moved to fast, skilful pressure forward lines. Which tabs is none. So they would be mad!

 

[s_wd6]

Talk over in the East today was Pies and Dees potential suitors.

The game has moved to fast, skilful pressure forward lines. Which tabs is none. So they would be mad!

Would love to see him at Dees tbh

 

[mayne iac]

Juh for butters