List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets

[Swiggy]

I'll comfortably bet Delean is delisted next year, I don't see anything there outside an OK goal sense. I also don't think Simpson was drafted as a small forward, same way I don't think Switta is technically a small forward.

Maybe they do go best available, Berry or Hannaford could be best available though I wouldn't be upset with Reid (some have him as fast 15) or Lindsay.

we will see, I'm not writing Delean off yet. He was going to take time

Walls said they draft night they see him to be a forward.

 

[Swiggy]

Surely you can back the coach in without trading away the future.

Assuming Warner / Pickett is out of play we need to exit this trade period with 1 x 1st rounder this year and our 2025 1st rounder in tact.

Plenty of talk they'll trade into next year's draft for if warner is still in play
lots to play out yet

I'll back walls in

 

[dont bowl there]

Plenty of talk they'll trade into next year's draft for if warner is still in play
lots to play out yet

I'll back walls in

I genuinely hate the idea of trading into next years draft on the chance that Warner is available. All the talk is that this draft will be a lot deeper and I don't see why we would even need to trade into next years draft anyway. If Warner nominates Fremantle at the end of 2025 we will be fine with what we have.

 

[Lach72]

Twomey just stated we have pick 10 on the table

















For Liam Baker

7

Liam Baker

Age

26

Ht

173cm

Wt

72kg

Pos.

D/F

Career

Season

Last 5

D

15.7

4star

K

7.8

3star

HB

7.9

5star

M

3.2

3star

T

2.6

4star

MG

222.2

3star

D

14.6

4star

K

6.8

3star

HB

7.9

4star

M

3.8

4star

T

1.8

3star

MG

191.9

3star

D

14.4

4star

K

6.2

3star

HB

8.2

5star

M

1.6

2star

T

1.8

4star

MG

224.2

4star

 

[s_wd6]

Two met just stated we have pick 10 on the table

















For Liam Baker

tf???????

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

Two met just stated we have pick 10 on the table

















For Liam Baker

What is a two met and no we dont

 

[Swiggy]

I genuinely hate the idea of trading into next years draft on the chance that Warner is available. All the talk is that this draft will be a lot deeper and I don't see why we would even need to trade into next years draft anyway. If Warner nominates Fremantle at the end of 2025 we will be fine with what we have.

Because freo have good academy also they'll want to match bids

 

[mattis117]

What is a two met and no we dont

My guess is Twomey autocorrected.

 

[apuchar]

Two met just stated we have pick 10 on the table

















For Liam Baker

Surely not!

 

[Lach72]

What is a two met and no we dont

Twomey

And direct quote

 

[Alfonz]

Some of the good teams have a mosquito fleet. But Brisbane and Sydney only play one genuine small forward. Papley and Cameron. Bolton will be our equivalent, albeit with more midfield minutes.

We'll have a lot of smalls ... Bolton, Freddy, Switta, Simpson, Walters for 1 more year. I would also consider Serong a genuine small forward option who can rest down there when Bolton goes into the centre bounces.

I'd like to draft Hannaford, but if we bring in Baker then I think it tips us towards favouring Hynes, Davis types to bolster the medium forward stocks.

 

[dont bowl there]

Because freo have good academy also they'll want to match bids

We can sort that out after trade week, pretty sure you can still trade picks up until and including draft day. If we move another first round pick into next year we will just be giving that to Sydney if Warner asks out. Can't give what you don't have.

 

[DeanS]

Hopefully the Baker talk is just to boost what WCE have to pay for him. Hopefully.

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

Twomey

And direct quote

I've told myself not to get baited until the trade is done this year but I swear to God, if Walls gives up pick 10 for Baker I will ****ing blow the place up.

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

Additionally, the positive spin on offering 10 for Baker is that it's clearly 9 and 16 for Bolton...

 

[Dayts]

Tombstone is the one I trust most in the media and he’s been pumping this the whole time!
Very concerning…

 

[Joao]

I'm finding a new sport if Baker costs pick 10.

There is no world where 15 is about right for a 24yo Smith and pick 10 is right for 27yo Baker.

 

[Vimal Anand]

Additionally, the positive spin on offering 10 for Baker is that it's clearly 9 and 16 for Bolton...

Yes we'll spoted

On SM-S918B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Hammersoup]

Easier said than done

surely you back your coach in

Maybe hard but a good club should not sell itself short to save a coach. We need to be better than that.

 

[Lach72]

Additionally, the positive spin on offering 10 for Baker is that it's clearly 9 and 16 for Bolton...

If I remember exactly:
“Freo have pick 10 on the table, West Coast have pick 13”

 

[Lach72]

I'm finding a new sport if Baker costs pick 10.

There is no world where 15 is about right for a 24yo Smith and pick 10 is right for 27yo Baker.

Yeah I’d be ****ing irate

We’d be back at 9, 10 and 16 for Baker Bolton and at least 21

Still blows chunks

 

[mayne iac]

MB with 21 coming back?

 

[Joao]

The only way I can rationalise it is if we've put that up to try and lure Baker (remembering that he wants Richmond compensated) because the Eagles are being (rightfully) stingy.

But even that is unacceptable, he's just not that good.

 

[Cobbler]

10 for Baker! Bloody hell.

Well I guess it outbids Eagles and shows we want him.

I still think he’ll be an awesome addition.

But it is squeaky bum time with what Bolton will cost!

 

[Lach72]

All three first for those 2 and 21 I could perhaps live with.

Effectively 9 and 10 and a 5 pick down grade, leaving us 21 and 28…could still end up with quality there, and our whole 2025 draft hand intact for Warner