List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well clearly the best example is Weller #2 and just last year Shultz for F1 & #34
thats milking the at its best. sure pick 19 was not expected but 15/16 plus 34 is still good overs

I’ll pay Weller, but by all reports we were blindsided with an incredibly late request. From memory there was like 48 hours of trade period left. I may have it wrong, but from memory it caught us completely off guard. I don’t know all the details. I’d love to know what the next offer was.

Schultz isn’t being hard ass. Collingwood won the flag and we knew ‘pick 19’ would be in the 20s. It ended up being pick 25.

Schultz for 25 and 35? Yeah, we were real hard ass about that.
 
Well clearly the best example is Weller #2 and just last year Shultz for F1 & #34
thats milking the at its best. sure pick 19 was not expected but 15/16 plus 34 is still good overs

Just had a nice read recapping the Weller deal.

Gold Coast offered 24, Matera and Wilson.

They then offered to upgrade our pick 5 to 2.

They’re both hilariously bad offers.

Freo knew no one wants to actively seek Gold Coast. Stood firm and deal was completed. Gold Coast also had 4 picks inside top 10 the year before and were constantly drafting and losing players.

Although I said I pay Weller. I don’t think we were being hard. We just placed a marker on the table knowing Gold Coast had no other options.
 
I would only be moving a pick into next year if we were already sending our f1 as part of the Bolton/Baker trades. I wouldn't be stoked on it but its in the realm of acceptable, unlike pick 10 for Baker which I think the consensus is pretty clear how bad that is.
9+16 for Bolton+29
10 for Norths F1
Our F1 for Baker (which would be a massive gamble but with the addition of both Baker and Bolton you would hope its above pick 14). Now that I have just typed that out I still don't like it.

Agreeing with most that there isn't a need to add value into next years draft. If Warner chooses us uncontracted, we have 2 firsts to satisfy Sydney. There is no need to add to it, not to mention there is odds on to have one player on the move anyway.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Well clearly the best example is Weller #2 and just last year Shultz for F1 & #34
thats milking the at its best. sure pick 19 was not expected but 15/16 plus 34 is still good overs

Weller requested the trade on the final day of the trade period. I’ll actually reject my initial comment about paying Weller.
There’s nothing hard ass at all about that trade.
The end result was awesome, but wasn’t like we were knobs about that. I’d argue Weller blindsided both clubs. Suns simply had to blink first.
 
Jeez it’s been a big day here.

Cal Twomey has us all on a string with his sound bites.
I’m a Baker fan but pick 10? Surely this is a joke?
He’s out of contract for ****s sake!!

Should be a similar price to what Ed Langdon was traded to Melbourne for from us.

Has anyone remarked yet on the most interesting part of the Baker chat today on Gettable?
Cal said that Liam Baker has been paying very close attention and wants to be fully informed as to the potential draft compensation that Richmond will get from both west coast and freo and wants to ensure that the tigers are fully compensated and not shortchanged in any way.

Does he think he’s bloody LeBron James or something?!

The market decides what a player is worth. Why the **** would baker care? That really annoyed me
 
Freo get Bolton pick 6
Freo give 9, 10 17

North give pick 2
North receive houston pick 10

Port receive luko pick 9
Port give Houston second rounder

Gold Coast give pick 6 luko
Gold Coast receive Rioli second rounder

Richmond give Bolton Rioli
Richmond receive pick 2 17

Could see this is how it plays out seems pretty fair obviously there would be later picks thrown around to even it all up a bit
we get screwed & port power smash that trade
no thanks
 
Jeez it’s been a big day here.

Cal Twomey has us all on a string with his sound bites.
I’m a Baker fan but pick 10? Surely this is a joke?
He’s out of contract for ****s sake!!

Should be a similar price to what Ed Langdon was traded to Melbourne for from us.

Has anyone remarked yet on the most interesting part of the Baker chat today on Gettable?
Cal said that Liam Baker has been paying very close attention and wants to be fully informed as to the potential draft compensation that Richmond will get from both west coast and freo and wants to ensure that the tigers are fully compensated and not shortchanged in any way.

Does he think he’s bloody LeBron James or something?!

The market decides what a player is worth. Why the **** would baker care? That really annoyed me
It has gotten out of hand.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Jeez it’s been a big day here.

Cal Twomey has us all on a string with his sound bites.
I’m a Baker fan but pick 10? Surely this is a joke?
He’s out of contract for ****s sake!!

Should be a similar price to what Ed Langdon was traded to Melbourne for from us.

Has anyone remarked yet on the most interesting part of the Baker chat today on Gettable?
Cal said that Liam Baker has been paying very close attention and wants to be fully informed as to the potential draft compensation that Richmond will get from both west coast and freo and wants to ensure that the tigers are fully compensated and not shortchanged in any way.

Does he think he’s bloody LeBron James or something?!

The market decides what a player is worth. Why the **** would baker care? That really annoyed me

Walls needs to be sent back to drafting talent only if we end up giving pick 10 for OOC Baker.
Thats sackable stuff that. Can’t have a list manager being that soft
Dude chill.
 
View attachment 2121618

Sir. Snuffaluphagus and his band of merry followers aren’t buying all these signings as proof we’re competent.

God damn it. They’ve seen this before.

I believe so.

What have we left?

Only code red, sir.

Do it.

But, sir…

Did I stutter? Drop the Banfield news. Do it now!
Gabriel Iglesias Snack GIF by First We Feast
 
Using NOD as an inside tagger would be an incredible waste of his abilities.


I like that the club are at least planning around having that lever to pull. He might only play 4 or 5 games in a run with role next season but it's a good option to have if Bontempelli etc get off the chain.
 
We’ve done some pretty stupid things as a footy club, but trading pick 10 for an uncontracted Baker would be on the podium.

I refuse to believe we’re that stupid
It will happen.

Can’t see the upside of a Baker. I mean who does he replace? JOM on the defensive wing? Back half? Walker. Then we lose a lockdown defender. Wagner? He’s been okay, is Baker really going to suddenly get that much better?

Let West Coast have him at their first round pick. That’s disgustingly over for a player you can easily get in state leagues
 
We don’t need Warner. We’d seriously do better using pick 9 this Year on one of those small forwards than move it on to next year for a chance at Warner. We lose him to west coast so what? It’s not like he’s going to make them a better team than us.
One of those small forwards could be the next wizard. Would help us instantly.
 
We don’t need Warner. We’d seriously do better using pick 9 this Year on one of those small forwards than move it on to next year for a chance at Warner. We lose him to west coast so what? It’s not like he’s going to make them a better team than us.

Warner kicked 34.18 this season. He would be the small forward we hope we get with a mid first round pick.

Screenshot_20240925_172941_Samsung Internet.jpg

Pickett and Bolton very similar to Warner, except Warner had an elite impact in stoppages too for about twice the goal assists.
 
Warner kicked 34.18 this season. He would be the small forward we hope we get with a mid first round pick.

View attachment 2121741

Pickett and Bolton very similar to Warner, except Warner had an elite impact in stoppages too for about twice the goal assists.
A small forward we draft could also kick a similar number of goals in a year or two (see Nick Watson) for a fraction of the cost picks and money wise
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top