- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
And a floggerDanger is a protected species.
Lol
Blues to join Dees at Tribunal, Bulldog's lucky escape
The match review findings for Sunday's round 24 games are inwww.afl.com.au
I'm the first to put my hand up and say I'm not an Owies fan, but this is just wrong!!! Club needs to pull out all stops and challenge this all the way through to the Interplanetary Supreme Court of Justice.
And that clown Christian should just **** off and get a job at a circus.
I don't think it works that way? My understanding is that the AFL rubber-stamps all the MRO decisions before they are released. The only thing they will appeal is a tribunal decision.If the AFL is smart, they'll challenge the Jones incident to get ahead of a Carlton challenge on Owies.
We need to appeal again, win again then sue the afl for the money spent on lawyers and the time wasted arguing due to their plants incompetence and anti Carlton bias.collingwood flog should not be the MRO.
.....and the punchline to all of this is that Owies got the free kick off the umpire.....opps!!! If both Higgins and Cadman got up and played out their respective games then both tackles should be be deemed the same......low impact. Bloody Christian must have played in a lot of losing games against Carlton that`s for sure!!!I'm the first to put my hand up and say I'm not an Owies fan, but this is just wrong!!! Club needs to pull out all stops and challenge this all the way through to the Interplanetary Supreme Court of Justice.
And that clown Christian should just **** off and get a job at a circus .
And Maynard ended some bloke's career last year with 'no case to answer.'So by the MROs logic, Heeney's backhand is worse than Jones' tackle. Let alone the inconsistent calls between what Owies did and the tackle Jones laid. What a joke!
I'm not even shocked to be sitting here , Christian is a **** stick of the highest orderAnd Maynard ended some bloke's career last year with 'no case to answer.'
The bloke's a ****ing joke who claims to be independant. Total biased bullshit.
If Owies is not in the mix for selection it'll be a nice way for the club to "drop" him. We only challenge for our must have's and considering Owies has not even been offered a contract I doubt we challenge.I'm the first to put my hand up and say I'm not an Owies fan, but this is just wrong!!! Club needs to pull out all stops and challenge this all the way through to the Interplanetary Supreme Court of Justice.
And that clown Christian should just **** off and get a job at a circus.
Dunno, reckon we should challenge and send a message to the team that that sort of tackle pressure is recognised and needs to continue next week and beyond.If Owies is not in the mix for selection it'll be a nice way for the club to "drop" him. We only challenge for our must have's and considering Owies has not even been offered a contract I doubt we challenge.
How did Jones get a fine!
I reckon we challenge. Regardless of whether he has been offered a contract or not. He is the third highest scorer at the club.If Owies is not in the mix for selection it'll be a nice way for the club to "drop" him. We only challenge for our must have's and considering Owies has not even been offered a contract I doubt we challenge.
Jones got a free kick against for a dangerous tackle and Owies got a free kick for running down his opponent....the reasoning for the impact assessments are not clear to me
I would think the Bedford tackle of taranto was very similar. Momentum carrying both players forward. And he got off eventually even though taranto was injured.Carlton will challenge and use Dangerfield as an example of momentum propelling Higgins forward.