- Nov 14, 2010
- 46,836
- 54,119
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Nah no need to add the f2Split 2 (+2025 second rounder) for two first (one in top 10). Pick up the drifting mid (Langford, Smillie, MReid) + a top rated KPF.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah no need to add the f2Split 2 (+2025 second rounder) for two first (one in top 10). Pick up the drifting mid (Langford, Smillie, MReid) + a top rated KPF.
He’d be posting more tripeChairman Zia has been a bit quiet lately....
If he ****ing what?If he had of committed we definitely go for talls this year.
Not knowing could leave us a bit thin in the midfield should he leave next year.
A bit disappointing considering he had a few tough years when he first arrived and the club stuck by him.
Sent from my CPH2197 using Tapatalk
Don’t mind it.Im wondering if Richmond wont give 6 -10/11 for 2 understandably not likely they would prefer to fatten with teen picks......would they give 6 for F1
Then we give Pick 2 & F2 to GWS for 15 & 16 & F1
Losing Pick 2, F1 & F2
Gaining 6-15-16 GWS F1
We lose some capital but get selections right where we want them + GWS F1
15&16 is horrendous, there isn't an adjective bad enough to describe 15&21. That proposal can FRO.Don’t mind it.
Another GWS option if we had a secondary trade agreed with Melb (or Saints). Preferably 15 & 16, more likely 15 & 21.
F1 > GWS 15, 21
(-44 points based on F1 pick 4)
2, 21 > Melb 5 & 9
(-48 points)
5 - Tauru
9 - Armstrong (Shanahan)
15 - Berry (Hannaford)
Would be much simpler if we still had 25 to play with..!
In isolation yes, has to be linked to getting 5 & 9, I’d be stoked to walk away with:15&16 is horrendous, there isn't an adjective bad enough to describe 15&21. That proposal can FRO.
I recall an interview where Harley Reid compared himself to Lance Picioane.Can anyone think of a recent draftee that has modelled themselves on a North Melbourne player? Our players always are seemingly looked over when it comes to role models..
The great man strikes again!!
Only to the teams getting the benefits. In reality it’s negligent not to. Lombard as well. I’d be happy to get Ashcroft or Lombard with pick 2 anyway.Would we be unpopular if we bid on both Ashcroft and Kako before doing our real business with #2 ?
Lombard looks like a quicker, more dynamic Touk Miller going by the highlights. Super prospect.Only to the teams getting the benefits. In reality it’s negligent not to. Lombard as well. I’d be happy to get Ashcroft or Lombard with pick 2 anyway.
Of course the Tigers want 1 and 2! I’m just surprised at how little half the supporters on here would accept for the pick. 6 and 10 or 11 should be the least we accept. It’s still most likely that we lose that deal in the long run.10 wont be part. 6/11. Pick 2 maybe maybe they’ll swindle F3.
Richmond fans are going to melt. Tigers want pick 1&2.
The great man strikes again!!
Anything can be true when you make it upHow can we make a verbal agreement to trade North our F3 when we gave it to Fremantle in the Bolton trade?
3.151 and 8.601Souup any testing numbers for River Stevens? Eye test to me suggests he would test well for 10-20m sprint times and agility.
Do you have the Hannaford results from the vic combine by chance?3.151 and 8.601
He’d be posting more tripe
That's the end of that. On to other scenarios I guess.
The great man strikes again!!
Big clubs are allowed to trade the same pick to several teams- read the fine printHow can we make a verbal agreement to trade North our F3 when we gave it to Fremantle in the Bolton trade?
The great man strikes again!!
How can we make a verbal agreement to trade North our F3 when we gave it to Fremantle in the Bolton trade?
Tauru and or Armstrong are essential gets even if we take one of them at 2. Trade F1 to get a second and third pick further down.In isolation yes, has to be linked to getting 5 & 9, I’d be stoked to walk away with:
5 - Tauru
9 - Armstrong
15 - Berry