- Oct 19, 2015
- 1,031
- 4,640
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Can't of been fun sitting on the bench all game last night lolHugo looks a bit like he's running through mud, might have been a long season for the lad
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Can't of been fun sitting on the bench all game last night lolHugo looks a bit like he's running through mud, might have been a long season for the lad
Great they did.Bizarre how they picked him
Tsatas is an absolute butcher by foot, i reckon he has maybe had one or two effective kicks
Thought he was ok. His positioning is really good and he got a couple of nice spoils in. I think we will just look at him as being very raw and having a lot to work on but also he has a lot to work with. He’s quick off the mark and a massive unit. He would have been very nervous today so that would have affected him. He’s worth a spot on the listSo how did everyone assess Coles game today? 2 disposals and one was a toe kick along the ground. By contrast James Barratt a tall defender from Bendigo rolled out for Essendon, he had 8 disposals and 4 marks and one was a high quality pack mark.
I hope you all watched how when there is a ball in dispute on the ground how Cole stands 5 metres off the contest and rarely gets involved. How at times looks a bit timid with how he attacks the ball or the man. He does exactly the same at U18 level so it wasnt because he was playing VFL. Yes he had a couple of good spoils but for me we need defenders who provide a darn sight more than that.
He is 18 yo playing in the VFL so we shouldnt expect too much, but for me he offers little more at U18 level. Finding or winning the ball is something that needs to be learnt at junior level its too late to be taught at higher levels. Lets hope that showing detracts clubs from bidding on him so if we want we can take him as a rookie.
With Cole having played for Sandringham now, have we found a loophole for our drafting a Zebra promise?
Not nominate for the draft? Not sure about that.With Cole having played for Sandringham now, have we found a loophole for our drafting a Zebra promise?
Maybe but if we do that then imo there’s no point making the promise
Well Weiderman sort of suggests that we shouldn't take a key defender in the first round.
He looked absolute blue chip in his draft year. Funny how some just don't work out. Josh Schache too.
Maybe but if we do that then imo there’s no point making the promise
Sorry guys, this was tongue in cheek - I never actually intended it to be taken seriously.With Cole having played for Sandringham now, have we found a loophole for our drafting a Zebra promise?
Only a one year contract so not a big commitment if they are no good.Personally with such a tiny pool to select from, I cannot fathom how we can actually afford to rookie a Sandy player every year.
Only a one year contract so not a big commitment if they are no good.
Might have just decided to give up a rookie spot to improve to quality of the sandy players
Think the idea is to attract fringe players to go down to sandy and compete for a list spot meaning sandy will get stronger could work
It's a good idea to ensure a stronger Sandringham, obviously helps the development of our kids. I'm not entirely sure we attracted anyone that we ordinarily would not have due to the arrangement.
The issue is that list spots are limited and its not like the AFL give us an extra spot to support the alignment. I'd personally hate to miss our next Sinclair or Wilkie due to space issues on the rookie list.
I know we got O'Leary, but he did play at Sandy Dragons last year. HHK was also a Sandy boy before the Swans.There were a couple of sign ups this year , who had recently missed the draft.
They haven't been so good , but it might get better in future.
The arrangement didnt get announced until well into the season so its yet to attract anyone.It's a good idea to ensure a stronger Sandringham, obviously helps the development of our kids. I'm not entirely sure we attracted anyone that we ordinarily would not have due to the arrangement.
The issue is that list spots are limited and its not like the AFL give us an extra spot to support the alignment. I'd personally hate to miss our next Sinclair or Wilkie due to space issues on the rookie list.
Announcement was in Oct 2023The arrangement didnt get announced until well into the season so its yet to attract anyone.
We have 2 spots in the rookie list automatically this year as both Heath and Sharman are technically still on it and are now at the 3 year limit you can keep them on it for.
No doubt SteeloSainter would have taken Weiderman & Scache because they were rated so much higher than anyone else ... because U18 level is where it's at .... potential / development / room for improvement .... can take a hikeWell Weiderman sort of suggests that we shouldn't take a key defender in the first round.
No doubt SteeloSainter would have taken Weiderman & Scache because they were rated so much higher than anyone else ... because U18 level is where it's at .... potential / development / room for improvement .... can take a hike