TENACIOUS
Premiership Player
- Aug 16, 2008
- 3,874
- 14,714
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Thread starter
- #2
https://s.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL Tenant/AFL/Files/Father-son-bidding-system.pdf
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Sorry mate.
6) Trading of picks included this year, no to future picks as they have no consequences.
Hi Ten,Doing all this on my phone, which is tough to do.
Yep, I’ve been using the same formula for all the bids.
Pick 12 = 1,268 points - 20% = 1,014 points
Pick 28 - 677 points + Pick 31 606 points = 1,283 points
1,283 paid - 1,014 cost = 269 points over
Essendon Next Pick:
Pick 40 - 429 points + 269 points = 698 points or Pick 28
Hold please Bletch, we’re just running a check on your workings….Hi Ten,
It doesn't really matter for the purposes of this phantom, so keep doing it this way.
But... The leftover points don't get added to the next pick. A new pick is inserted based on the leftover value, AFTER the draft order has been updated by removing the other picks. See the Heeney example on the link you shared, note the last pick used (57) gets moved back to 64, which is the value of the leftover picks.
So in this example, a new pick 12 is inserted and given to Essendon, everyone else shuffles down one pick. Essendon's pick 28 is moved to the back of the draft, and everyone after that pick shuffles up one. Essendon's pick 31 is moved to 51. Everyone else between 32 and 51 move up one. Essendon then have picks 39, 45, 51, 53, 54, 65. Here, 40 and 46 have been moved up one. 51 is new, and the remaining picks stay the same. I think...!!
It must be a nightmare doing this on your phone! Kudos to you. And as I said, just keep doing it the way you have been, it's fine that way.
Thanks for running this!
Agreed.Nobody is on the Hawks....next player taken on the BF phantom was Harry Charleston..... TENACIOUS should we just give Hawks harry and move on?
Sorry Coona. Just got online, wasn't expecting a bid here. Yes for the sake of this exercise WC will match, even though they've got a lot of small forwards including now Owies and Berry.Getting tough for doggies list needs here (without bidding on Ben Campo, which would annoy most with this exercise.)
Bid for West Coast NGA dynamic small forward Malakai Champion (nephew of Eddie Betts) TerryWallet what say you?
Oh, man. Twice I wanted to bid and twice refrained due to this being a Carlton Phantom Draft.
Personally think there's enough happening here that it won't come until after 40, but I do hope we bundle 3 & 38 and try to trade with Richmond or the Saints.Oh, man. Twice I wanted to bid and twice refrained due to this being a Carlton Phantom Draft.
It does highlight where he actually sits in the draft and how much we will be relying on goodwill if we maintain pick 38 as it stands.
This draft is not as deep as many, me included, think. There are players around the mark who are quality, but most are big boys in this part of the draft, rather than a range of types.
You should have bid, that’s what it’s all about.Oh, man. Twice I wanted to bid and twice refrained due to this being a Carlton Phantom Draft.
It does highlight where he actually sits in the draft and how much we will be relying on goodwill if we maintain pick 38 as it stands.
This draft is not as deep as many, me included, think. There are players around the mark who are quality, but most are big boys in this part of the draft, rather than a range of types.
Oh, man. Twice I wanted to bid and twice refrained due to this being a Carlton Phantom Draft.
It does highlight where he actually sits in the draft and how much we will be relying on goodwill if we maintain pick 38 as it stands.
This draft is not as deep as many, me included, think. There are players around the mark who are quality, but most are big boys in this part of the draft, rather than a range of types.
I think recruiters get spooked by pure inside mids that aren't elite users by foot or overly quick. It's also an extremely mid heavy draft, so teams are likely to fill that need with earlier picks which pushes him even further down the order. Father sons that are off broadway tend to drift further down the order regardless - Calsher Dear as a recent example.I agree with you but also have heard some insiders (might have been Twomey) who think Campo goes 45+
Not sure what's going on to tank his value this much.
I think recruiters get spooked by pure inside mids that aren't elite users by foot or overly quick. It's also an extremely mid heavy draft, so teams are likely to fill that need with earlier picks which pushes him even further down the order. Father sons that are off broadway tend to drift further down the order regardless - Calsher Dear as a recent example.