List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

The media coverage of this is bizarre to me.

If we absolutely wanted him we could have him. Teams fighting over pick 13 for him, we could split our first and blow that offer out of the water if we were so inclined.

Then Dan would have egg on his face if he refused to come to the club with the vastly superior offer.

Media acting like we are poor beggars when the bloke will go to the highest bidder, and we have the biggest bag at the table if want to play it.
I think you're conflating the best offer that Port gets and what Houston gets.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Step 1
When Richmond receives the pick#6 from GC and 10 or 11 from Freo then we pounce with our Pick#2 for Pick#6 and #10 or #11...

Step 2
Approach Port and negotiate a trade for Houston and see where it takes us.

Step 3
Give Daniels a deadline on deciding what he wants to do.

Step 4
Let the Parker deal run its course. We will get him its just about when.

Step 5 See what the Swanies want to get for Kostansky.

Step 6
Finish the trades and move on .
 
I wonder if the Houston talk is Clarko playing 7D chess with LMac and our defensive group. We are actively looking to replace a half back flanker and the Goat has dibs on the other flank.

I just cannot see a circumstance where we’re straight trading a F1 for Houston. It would be a negligent use of draft capital based on Poorts demands.
 
If we really want Houston, and both Collingwood and Carlton need pick 13 to make a trade happen, shouldn't we just white ant that trade?

Offer our F1 to GC for something like 13,23 and 41. That should be more appealing than what Carlton and Collingwood are offering.
GC want Noble. That’s why they are dealing with Pies isn’t it?
 
If the Tiggers get 6 and one of either 10 or 11 do we see if they would part with 6 and either 10 or 11 for our Pick#2 with some other later picks being swapped in the deal?

We end up with 6 and 10 or 6 and 11 , Tiggers get pick #2 and keep either 10 or 11 and we offer Port either 10 or 11 and our F1 for Houston and another swap of later picks. l cant see either Carlton orCollingwood doing better than that and l think its a win win for both North and Tiggers..

North end up with Houston,6, 25, 44, and 62 (Parker)
Tiggers end up with 1,2,10 or 11, 24, 32, 42, 43, 45, and 51
Port end up with 10 or 11, Norths F1st.
Let the Houston ship sail. That deal would be terrible. Not quite Freo of the 90s terrible, but terrible none-the less.

If we were able to swap 2+ a 3rd for 6+11, we bite their hands off.
 
I wonder if the Houston talk is Clarko playing 7D chess with LMac and our defensive group. We are actively looking to replace a half back flanker and the Goat has dibs on the other flank.

I just cannot see a circumstance where we’re straight trading a F1 for Houston. It would be a negligent use of draft capital based on Poorts demands.
Hardeman and Goater
 
If we really want Houston, and both Collingwood and Carlton need pick 13 to make a trade happen, shouldn't we just white ant that trade?

Offer our F1 to GC for something like 13,23 and 41. That should be more appealing than what Carlton and Collingwood are offering.
No can do - Gold Coast waiting for Houston to tell them what to do.

Sorry.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Ben King spotted on Arden st, trying to find a barista-made coffee 👀
 
Id also be pretty annoyed at Houston if I were a port supporter, wanting out 1 year into a 4 year deal, and even if you keep him you know he doesn't want to be there anymore and that his heart isn't in it. "I'm willing to stay" yeah no shit, what else is he going to say? It's good PR.
IMG_3535.gif
 
Failed to re assure his camp we could get a deal done it seems. Missed the window now.
At this point, I would just rather keep Kerch back to gain experience and size while we develop a dashing HB.

That or take Draper and give him a 2 year apprenticeship across HB.

Stuff the trades if they are too difficult. Daniel may not suit our needs and Houston was always going to get caught up in a bidding circus with big clubs.

Stick to the course. The wins will come with continued investment in the draft and savvy poaching of quality value targets.
 
If AFL were dating we'd big the king POC hunters. Not because its our preference, because we can only get tuna John West and every other brand rejected.
We slap a bit of lippy on em and tell ourselves we got the moves like Jagger.
IMG_3593.gif
 
Haven’t posted in a while but couldn’t let this is one fly under the radar.

This is quite comfortably the single worst opinion I’ve read regarding a North Melbourne player. Harry’s “kicking letting him down” is like saying Carey’s marking was a weakness. Where and how did you form this opinion? It’s borderline senile.

If you want we can go 1 for 1 with examples of his kicking ability. By the way, the best kicks turn it over more often because it is their role to take risks…

Sheezel a poor kick is diabolical work.
I didn’t say he was poor, I said his weakness was his kicking. He has hit opponents on their own, not even to a contest when entering 50, he’s turned the ball over numerous times in the middle. You can disagree all you like. Thats your opinion.

The problem with you lot is you think we walk out on the park with 22 A grade kicks of the footy. We are SHIT!
You probably think Baily Scott is s good kick of the footy.
 
I didn’t say he was poor, I said his weakness was his kicking. He has hit opponents on their own, not even to a contest when entering 50, he’s turned the ball over numerous times in the middle. You can disagree all you like. Thats your opinion.

The problem with you lot is you think we walk out on the park with 22 A grade kicks of the footy. We are SHIT!
You probably think Baily Scott is s good kick of the footy.
This is just a lot of yapping - I will keep this brief:
  • Sheezel’s strength is his kicking
  • We don’t have 22, we have 1 elite kick of the football - wait for it…… Harry Sheezel (Colby will be when up the ground)
  • We are S***, Harry is not
  • Bailey Scott is not a good kick and you didn’t need to drag bro into this.

Please stop firing blindly - this makes no sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top