Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
eagles arent trading pick 3
Creativity and elite distribution off half back would be a great fillip for us too.I meaaannnnnn Houston is also very damaging for scoring he was = 2nd for score launches at Port this year and top 10 for assists and score involvements.
Was thinking we should be flirting with this and giving that info to the journos.Richmond should be seriously considering the possibility of us trading 10/11 out. You can't give what you don't have. It would test out how keen they would be to have Bolton back, who tbh really wants out.
I think the story goes Baker wants to see Richmond get a fair deal, so maybe F2 isn’t good enough. I call BS though. Baker wouldn’t care about that too much..after all did nominate the one club unlike Bolts.
Baker and his management team better get their house in order if he thinks we’re the fallback option. We should of been his priority destination to begin with. He should of just nominated “WA club” like Jackson, Bolton.
Kelly and Baker are just campaignery doing what they did.
Out of contract player with a few years left before decline? F2. Bolton can be handled in isolation.Per the Jon Ralph tweets: he nominated West Coast because they assured him they had an appropriate pick lined up and a willingness to get the trade done. That was the fair deal Baker thought he had lined up. We are literally the fallback option. The question is whether pride prevents us from adding a mature quality player to our side (at the right price, of course).
Wonder if Hawks are trying to back out of Barrass.
Battle didn't commit until late, Maybe they didn't think they'd get both.
Frost is staying as well.
Still a long way to go in this draft and I'm not seeing a need to rule anything out.It’s a great test as to the ability of freo to trade properly, to the level that is actually required for a club like us to be successful.
If we give 10 and 11 for Bolton in one of the best drafts touted in ages we are setting ourselves up to fail.
It’s completely over the top. I don’t care if 14 and 18 are swapped as part of it.
Pick 11 should be off the table in all circumstances. Just draw a hard line in the sand - it is not for trading.
Jesus I can only imagine what we will pay for Warner next year it’s 10 & 11 in a Bolton trade. Warner is a far superior player, the mind boggles at what Sydney could extort from us
Not sure, but maybe they were thinking on pulling out then as well.Didnt they still adjust their offer late, once Barrass was (unofficially) confirmed? I know they didn't match St Kilda but thought they increased it still?
No, they're after Tambling Mark II.You blokes must really want the next Aaron Fiora
I meaaannnnnn Houston is also very damaging for scoring he was = 2nd for score launches at Port this year and top 10 for assists and score involvements.
They should consider splitting iteagles arent trading pick 3
If they had 14, they could have gone 3 & 14 for the saints 7 & 8They should consider splitting it
You’re not getting pick 3.You think it's about Baker. That's the mistake. This is about Bolton. He can head to WCE for pick #3.
If WCE wanted two firsts for Barrass, they won’t be happy with one future in a weaker draft. Interesting last few days.Think Baker is back in play.
No way will Richmond accept future first for Baker if West Coast accept that from Hawthorn
Pick 10, 11 and 18 for Bolton and Baker probably will work
This is the sort of level of delusion I dream to have.Fremantle - 10(RICH), 11(RICH) & 18(MEL)
Melbourne - 5(MEL) & Pickett (FRE)
Richmond - 1(MEL), Bolton(FRE), 20(FRE)
Hawthorn are on the rise.If WCE wanted two firsts for Barrass, they won’t be happy with one future in a weaker draft. Interesting last few days.