He's a professional and simply made a choice based on the fact he followed WCE as a kid and also familiar faces will be there.Why would we also want someone who doesn't clearly wanna come here?
I'm sure if he plays for Freo, he's ready to go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's a professional and simply made a choice based on the fact he followed WCE as a kid and also familiar faces will be there.Why would we also want someone who doesn't clearly wanna come here?
The club continues to basically publicly say, 11 8s off the table and every pick swap proves their point more. I'll be disappointed if they fold now
This deal has like three different massively lopsided elements in Freo's favour that make it unworkable. But most crucially: if you think Melbourne are trading out their 2nd highest goal scorer for 2024, a 23 year contracted through til 2027 for 20 + an f2 you are dreaming.
It’s an actual joke nowI can’t for the life of me understand why everyone at the club rates Baker that highly they’re obsessed with him
In the incredible bizarre world Baker actually falls through to us, its clearly 10, 11, 18 with something in the 20s coming back, regardless of how we all rate BakerWouldn’t be surprised if it’s 10 and 18 for Bolton, 10 and 11 for Bolton and Baker.
Baker is really worth an early 20’s, Bolton is over at 10 and 18
Yeah it's laughable but I'll bet that the idea has been floated by Freo to Richmond. Freo want best deal and Richmond don't want to hold on too long before some picks possible go elsewhere.10 & 30 IMO is laughable and I think anyone who's watched enough Bolton footy knows that.
Respectfully you've probably not seen him play enough. I think he'll contribute really well to Freo. The two of them together would really make Freo an interesting team to watch for me and I think they might help push top 4-6.
From your (Freo fans) perspectives, are there any conditions on which you would agree to 10 + 11 + 18 for Bolton + Baker?
Example; if Richmond pays significant portion of Bolton's wages. Maybe 24 coming back your way?
Normally I'd say you're dreaming but some of the pick swaps this year make me think that my normal understanding needs to be thrown out the window this year.11 for 17 and a F1.
Who says no??
Based on the Melbourne, Essendon trade Geelong would need to add more. I expect Geelong to finish top 4 next year
Essendon gives pick 9 and a future third-round pick
Melbourne gives pick 28, 40, 46, 54, 65 and its future first-round pick
Because 12-18 next year is not the same as this year apparentlyNormally I'd say you're dreaming but some of the pick swaps this year make me think that my normal understanding needs to be thrown out the window this year.
I'd do it btw. I can't see how a pick 11 is every worth two picks around 12-18.
Yeah I’m pretty sure that’s what I heard!!wtfAm I crazy or at the end of that Brierty interview did he say “bring the player in to the Claremont footy club”??
Might have just been a fuzzy radio or my old ears have copped too much death metal in my time, but I’m sure that’s what he said.
It helps to get Richmond to accept that the Bolton price is 10 and 18 if we keep saying Baker is 11 with 24 coming back.In the incredible bizarre world Baker actually falls through to us, its clearly 10, 11, 18 with something in the 20s coming back, regardless of how we all rate Baker
Understand that's the reasoning but it's not like next year is an expansion draft.Because 12-18 next year is not the same as this year apparently
Yeah but no current first rounders. Future pick values are discounted even in a normal year, let alone this one.I don’t care how much they rate Baker. You don’t give up pick 11 (worth a first, two seconds, and two third rounders in this draft apparently) for an out of contract 27 year old role player. Two second should be enough for him.
Pretty similar to what happened with Clark.Don't understand this at all.
Houston is only worth pick 13, but we should pay 10 and 18 for Bolton.
Only Fremantle and Gold Coast would pay 10 and 18 for him. It is silly chasing contracted players, and then offering lots at the start
We want Baker because he's good at football. He's still very fast, he's a hard worker, he's good at quickly making bold decisions. His kicking efficiency admittedly looks terrible on paper. Well, Hayden Young went at 60.1% KE this year. Taking risky options and trying to pick out dangerous targets ruins you on paper, but we can't all be Luke Ryan at 90% KE from long bombs. Our last kick of the score chain has been the problem for years, and Baker would be a huge improvement on anyone else we could play at half-forward other than Treacy and Young and maybe Switta, all of which we need elsewhere.
Ignore the flashy stuff and notice how often he takes an absolutely jaw-dropping pinpoint accuracy disposal to keep the play alive. That is what we need at half-forward. He will also kick some goals for us which will be nice.
****ing highWhat are the odds of no player getting traded today?
It’s bat shit crazy some of the thinking that’s getting around this- “happy to pay 10/11 for Bolten , happy to pay 10,11,18 for Bolten baker etcI don’t care how much they rate Baker. You don’t give up pick 11 (worth a first, two seconds, and two third rounders in this draft apparently) for an out of contract 27 year old role player. Two second should be enough for him.