Game Day 2024 Trade Period

[Eski3]

If it end up being 10 and 11 with 23 coming back, 23 is the first pick on night 2 of the draft, so we could get a significant pick for it during the overnight trade shenanigans they do

 

[King Huskii]

It was posted in June. Not even close to today. Old mate just didn’t check the date before posting on here

It said on my news feed 10 hours ago

 

[Docker82]

If it end up being 10 and 11 with 23 coming back, 23 is the first pick on night 2 of the draft, so we could get a significant pick for it during the overnight trade shenanigans they do

Pick 23 wouldn’t be traded by us unless we were only sliding back a few picks and the price paid for that was very very generous (i.e. F2 to slide back two spots).

I’m not a fan of trading picks 10 and 11 at all unless we get pick 14 coming back - we’d obviously need to throw more picks into that deal.

 

[_007_]

Not sure Tigers ever change their spots


On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app

Tigers have stripes.

 

[arsesmart]

I sat there and watched him tear strips off some young Richmond player for daring to cut in front of him and get his first AFL goal , the whole rest of the Tigers were giving him the ol attaboy and Bolton was going apeshit at the kid …. one of the most floggish things I’ve ever seen a player do in footy

Throwing in the towel when things aren’t going his way is another criticism you hear about him a lot

the showing the ball running into goal bullshit

Maybe we need a bit of arrogance in the team but it’s a pretty delicate balance

Most of the Tiger fans saying we’d be mad not to take this deal spent all of last year hating on the bloke and are secretly chuckling behind their hands

50/50 wether this deal is what everyone hopes for or just another in our long list of trade disasters for mine


On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app

Really?! That doesn't sound good. You got more specifics...game, opposition, year, quarter?

 

[thistimeforsure]

Tigers have stripes.

Do they ???

I must have been thinking of an elephant


On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Dale147]

 

[thistimeforsure]

Really?! That doesn't sound good. You got more specifics...game, opposition, year, quarter?

If you are really asking and this is not some passive aggressive wank then

It was against us this year down the train station end and he already had four so I’m tipping 3rd or 4th quarter


On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Tony_Clifton]

Am I the only one who would prefer we just hold onto the picks and select another three first rounders?

The accepted wisdom is you build your list from the draft and then pivot to trading in when you're entering your window to maximise a push to the summit. This strategy appears to suit the aggressive goal setting from management.

I'd prefer to to simply making value based decisions rather than trying to time the market.

Bolton will be 26 next year. He's played 135 games over 8 seasons. Optimistically We would get 6 years and 120 games out of Bolton. I think there is more long term value in picks 9&10 or 9&16.

AFL is a funny business where winning a premiership is all that ever matters. It makes arguments like overpaying for Bolton is the right play given our window. For what it's worth, Brisbane's premiership team had one first year player, two second year players and two third year players.

 

[Ge3ks]

Am I the only one who would prefer we just hold onto the picks and select another three first rounders?

Probably not.

 

[Heave Ho Bro]

There was a picture of Pearce holding a decent sized Snapper with his arm that was injured. He has a nice scar but I’m sure all will be fine.

He needs to get back on the bone broth though if his bones are fragile again. Last thing we need is his legs snapping again.

 

[Swiggy]

Am I the only one who would prefer we just hold onto the picks and select another three first rounders?

The accepted wisdom is you build your list from the draft and then pivot to trading in when you're entering your window to maximise a push to the summit. This strategy appears to suit the aggressive goal setting from management.

I'd prefer to to simply making value based decisions rather than trying to time the market.

Bolton will be 26 next year. He's played 135 games over 8 seasons. Optimistically We would get 6 years and 120 games out of Bolton. I think there is more long term value in picks 9&10 or 9&16.

AFL is a funny business where winning a premiership is all that ever matters. It makes arguments like overpaying for Bolton is the right play given our window. For what it's worth, Brisbane's premiership team had one first year player, two second year players and two third year players.

the issues is that Bolton fits a massive need. if it was any average joe most would be happy to hit draft
when a match winner like bolton become available you have to try to get him

 

[King Huskii]

the issues is that Bolton fits a massive need. if it was any average joe most would be happy to hit draft
when a match winner like bolton become available you have to try to get him

Bolton short term sugar hit or Allen and Berry long term

 

[thistimeforsure]

Am I the only one who would prefer we just hold onto the picks and select another three first rounders?

The accepted wisdom is you build your list from the draft and then pivot to trading in when you're entering your window to maximise a push to the summit. This strategy appears to suit the aggressive goal setting from management.

I'd prefer to to simply making value based decisions rather than trying to time the market.

Bolton will be 26 next year. He's played 135 games over 8 seasons. Optimistically We would get 6 years and 120 games out of Bolton. I think there is more long term value in picks 9&10 or 9&16.

AFL is a funny business where winning a premiership is all that ever matters. It makes arguments like overpaying for Bolton is the right play given our window. For what it's worth, Brisbane's premiership team had one first year player, two second year players and two third year players.

Hey friend

Thought it was just me




On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Purple Suit]

Am I the only one who would prefer we just hold onto the picks and select another three first rounders?

The accepted wisdom is you build your list from the draft and then pivot to trading in when you're entering your window to maximise a push to the summit. This strategy appears to suit the aggressive goal setting from management.

I'd prefer to to simply making value based decisions rather than trying to time the market.

Bolton will be 26 next year. He's played 135 games over 8 seasons. Optimistically We would get 6 years and 120 games out of Bolton. I think there is more long term value in picks 9&10 or 9&16.

AFL is a funny business where winning a premiership is all that ever matters. It makes arguments like overpaying for Bolton is the right play given our window. For what it's worth, Brisbane's premiership team had one first year player, two second year players and two third year players.

If we manage to pick up Bolton v2 in the draft with one of those picks & the other is a bust. It will take 3-4 years for him to emerge at an elite level. We then lose Pearce / Ryan so need more elite talents.

Young talent look good since they offer more than expected, the load is carried by the experienced players (FS guns being an exception). We need to compress our talent into the 21-26 age bracket and have a great 5-6 year go at winning a flag. Join us

 

[Ge3ks]

I would prefer to have a prime Bolton running amok in our forward line.

 

[Heave Ho Bro]

What's with all the love for Allen?

Surely we have more pressing needs with half backs, small and mid sized forwards?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Isn't his weakness his kicking? Last thing we need in our team is more bad kicking.

 

[Ge3ks]

Isn't his weakness his kicking? Last thing we need in our team is more bad kicking.

Right? Every chance Allan turns into Blakely 2.0
Good at winning the inside ball but absolutely butchers his disposals by foot.

 

[Heave Ho Bro]

Right? Every chance Allan turns into Blakely 2.0
Good at winning the inside ball but absolutely butchers his disposals by foot.

Whoever we draft good skills have to be a priority. We have too many in our side with iffy disposal by foot as it is. We need class.

 

[Lach72]

Am I the only one who would prefer we just hold onto the picks and select another three first rounders?

The accepted wisdom is you build your list from the draft and then pivot to trading in when you're entering your window to maximise a push to the summit. This strategy appears to suit the aggressive goal setting from management.

I'd prefer to to simply making value based decisions rather than trying to time the market.

Bolton will be 26 next year. He's played 135 games over 8 seasons. Optimistically We would get 6 years and 120 games out of Bolton. I think there is more long term value in picks 9&10 or 9&16.

AFL is a funny business where winning a premiership is all that ever matters. It makes arguments like overpaying for Bolton is the right play given our window. For what it's worth, Brisbane's premiership team had one first year player, two second year players and two third year players.

Brisbane also traded in Ah Chee, Neale, Daniher, Charlie Cameron, Darcy Fort and Conor McKenna as well as McCarthy who didn’t play. As well as three academy gifts.

You may make an argument that drafting 6 players woukd get the same result but you’d be wrong given Neale’s status

 

[Docker82]

Right? Every chance Allan turns into Blakely 2.0
Good at winning the inside ball but absolutely butchers his disposals by foot.

He does literally everything better than Blakely FFS.

His kicking ability is closer to Andy Brayshaw than Blakely. It’s not a strength but it’s not going to hold him back at AFL level.

The negativity around drafting this absolute gun youngster just because he doesn’t fill our biggest needs is beyond a joke. We’ll be trying to draft players like him in 2025 and 2026 because we’ll need them then plus he’s versatile and can play HBF or wing anyway.

He’s genuinely one of the top five 18 year olds from WA in the last five years. We’d be very very lucky to have him.

 

[simpsonwillo]

Am I the only one who would prefer we just hold onto the picks and select another three first rounders?

The accepted wisdom is you build your list from the draft and then pivot to trading in when you're entering your window to maximise a push to the summit. This strategy appears to suit the aggressive goal setting from management.

I'd prefer to to simply making value based decisions rather than trying to time the market.

Bolton will be 26 next year. He's played 135 games over 8 seasons. Optimistically We would get 6 years and 120 games out of Bolton. I think there is more long term value in picks 9&10 or 9&16.

AFL is a funny business where winning a premiership is all that ever matters. It makes arguments like overpaying for Bolton is the right play given our window. For what it's worth, Brisbane's premiership team had one first year player, two second year players and two third year players.

The time to pivot to trading is now imo. There's no doubt Bolton will maximise our push, he's a bloody good player, potentially one of the best in the comp when on with his best ahead of him. He will be bloody good for us, exciting times.

 

[CapitalA]

If we manage to pick up Bolton v2 in the draft with one of those picks & the other is a bust. It will take 3-4 years for him to emerge at an elite level. We then lose Pearce / Ryan so need more elite talents.

Young talent look good since they offer more than expected, the load is carried by the experienced players (FS guns being an exception). We need to compress our talent into the 21-26 age bracket and have a great 5-6 year go at winning a flag. Join us

We lose Pearce and Ryan but we replace them with Murphy/Draper/Davies who all look like developing into good players.

 

[Ge3ks]

He does literally everything better than Blakely FFS.

He surfs too?

 

[Cobbler]

If we only had 2 x firsts, I would still be all for trading in Bolton, but it would certainly come with a bit more squeaky bum time.

We may still pick someone up inside top 20.

3 youngsters, although exciting is more of a gamble then bringing in exactly what we need.

We have plenty of youth already.