We pick Naughton, I doubt we pick King. And Naughton is the Doggies third best key forward (I think he's undersized and goes missing in important matches but feasts on easybeats).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
For all we know, we did rate Coffield ahead of Naughton and did take 'best available'.If that draft taught us anything it was not to put needs ahead of best available.
None of us on BigFooty wanted Naughton but its who we should have got.
Worpel the player we should have got instead of Clavarino. ( And we might have if we'd taken Naughton thinking that he was a defender ).
For all we know, we did rate Coffield ahead of Naughton and did take 'best available'.
That sounds about right. Aside from Bonar, Higgins is the only other first rounder taken after our picks I recall a lot of conversation about.True, it was Elshaug at the helm after all.
My memory is that most of US on bigfooty were happy, because Clark was the best mid, and Coffield had very good skills with potential for mid. There were a few sourpusses because we didn't get Bonar.
I know it's the wrong answer but I'd take the risk of getting him for free in 12 months and keep the first rounders.
Coffield came from nowhere similar to how Bont did, goes to show its not a given.That sounds about right. Aside from Bonar, Higgins is the only other first rounder taken after our picks I recall a lot of conversation about.
Here it is, this. Offer 6 gazillion per year. Keep the multiple picks.I know it's the wrong answer but I'd take the risk of getting him for free in 12 months and keep the first rounders.
Yep, absolutely. I love what we have. But likely stars? Pou, Wilson? I really like Henry, Sharman, Hammer, Owens, Windy, Hugo, Keeler, Max. That’s a lot of hope still at this point.Is it shallow? We have 15 guys on our list now aged 21 or under and will likely add another 5-6 teenagers in this draft. I'm just wondering if we're going to try and contend while Sinclair, Marshall, Steele and Wilkie in particular are still around. Because once they go... boy it could be rough going for a while
Was just about to say that on Naughton. Hey, he’s no scrub and better than both of our picks. But I said the same last week prior to Friday. He beats up on garbage a bit.We pick Naughton, I doubt we pick King. And Naughton is the Doggies third best key forward (I think he's undersized and goes missing in important matches but feasts on easybeats).
I think he was commonly rated ahead of Naughton and that was about Coffield’s spot in the lead up. I remember not being overly enthused about them or anyone else tbh other than the 6 that went in front. Even those were hit and miss.For all we know, we did rate Coffield ahead of Naughton and did take 'best available'.
RTB and Hill have been quietly into Brayshaw. If we have a better 2025 than the Dockers, look out.Why Freo's Brayshaw could become AFL’s highest-paid player
There’s been a lot of talk about Fremantle landing some big signatures. One they haven’t yet is Andrew Brayshaw, who could be in for a huge pay day if he decides to leave, writes Paul Hasleby.thewest.com.au
How would you feel if we made Andy Brayshaw the AFLs highest paid player
I wouldn't do 2 picks.RTB and Hill have been quietly into Brayshaw. If we have a better 2025 than the Dockers, look out.
I would absolutely do 2 x first round picks for Brayshaw plus more. He's 25 next year and is genuinely elite. Would be buying a 7-8 year career.
I get that. But while Brayshaw is a very good player, I don't think we are one very good player away from winning the premiership next year. The risk to get him for free while also getting multiple first rounders in or keeping picks for trading in quality next year would be worth it for me.A bird in the hand…
He would be playing as a key defender for us though.Was just about to say that on Naughton. Hey, he’s no scrub and better than both of our picks. But I said the same last week prior to Friday. He beats up on garbage a bit.
Freo has Ports first this year, not sure what they'll give for Baker/Bolton if they get them. But I'd happily give pick 8 & 2025 1st for Ports 1st and Brayshaw. Feels fair but I'm biasedI wouldn't do 2 picks.
Freo will know they will probably lose him to free agency next year, and should be agreeable to taking him for the single pick this year.
Perhaps true and I think that’s probably his spot. Having said that, Max needs a big contested partner. A JVR type coming through.He would be playing as a key defender for us though.
Wasting him aren’t they. Never top 4 during H&A; have only one a final in two of all those years (albeit I’d take a flag and a GF right about any time ).When does the Bont come into fa?
He can’t be too happy at a club like the Dogs.
Dan Hannebery save us from ourselves
I would have preferred Charlie Constable, Toby Wooler, Conner Ballenden or even Hugh Dixon ahead of Worpel or Clav.If that draft taught us anything it was not to put needs ahead of best available.
None of us on BigFooty wanted Naughton but its who we should have got.
Worpel the player we should have got instead of Clavarino. ( And we might have if we'd taken Naughton thinking that he was a defender ).
Is that how aging works? Thanks for clarifying. My point was that the more you focus on youth, the more likely it is our guns now will be declining or retired by the time all those kids start becoming real contributors (with a few exceptions like NAS). With the lack of quality mid 20s players you mentioned, it presents a pretty difficult balancing act. I remember Joey making a similar point on Saints TV before the season started.When our 28 and 29 year olds are two years older, you do realise that our 21 year olds will... also be two years older.
We have a slight list age profile deficiency around 24-26 year olds right now (another reason to keep Clark), but it's overstated a bit. Marshall and Wilkie lightly raced (mature age recruits initially).
Is that how aging works? Thanks for clarifying. My point was that the more you focus on youth, the more likely it is our guns now will be declining or retired by the time all those kids start becoming real contributors (with a few exceptions like NAS). With the lack of quality mid 20s players you mentioned, it presents a pretty difficult balancing act. I remember Joey making a similar point on Saints TV before the season started.
I think Bassat said we want to hit the draft then start contending in 2026/2027 range. Seems mighty optimistic to me unless we can pull a Hawthorn and uncover some gems from unlikely places.
Hope this op is for good measure to clean up whatever is wrong with his knee, he’s the sorta player that will take our list to the next level if we continue to build our foundations right.Probably not the spot for this, but everyone is here or the Draft thread.
Reported this morning that Henry has gone in for a second operation on that knee.
In the last 20 years we've seen some teams win premierships with widely varying age list/team profiles: young (2008 Hawthorn and 2010 Collingwood) or old (the last two flags). Caminiti still probably presents as a 20th-30th player on the list - he's already played 33 games and a final. The 2021 class are already at over 50 games.
I don't share the pessimism at this stage.