Black Diamond
Sleight of Hand
And it would be with fingers crossed too. It would be little more than a guess. Everyone likes the idea of Harper (I do too) but the reality is a little different.I would take Harper over Jacobs. Without question.
I completely agree with this. There are some players who need to play at the highest level in order to play their best. However those players typically are still serviceable at the lower levels, which Harper isn't. They still are able to justify getting selected in the seniors at a minimum, which Harper can't.I'm one of those posters who has pushed the 'well he's not suited to VFL level but his game would be good at AFL level' err, nonsense. I just think some (very few) players are better at the highest level and I include Harps in that.
That's why I look towards total impact rather than possessions. Again, if not kicking a goal or tackling, what does Harper do? Shepherd? Handball? He is rarely part of scoring chains and I believe Turner already has him covered in that respect. So does McKenzie for total impact on a game. With Harper, you can't even say that "10 disposals by him is equal to 20 by <insert player>" because it just isn't true. It's highlight or bust.Just on the possession thing; yeah he does need to get it more often. But, at the same time, I think people may be basing it on some 20+ possession standard that isn't realistic for the sorts of role/s he plays.