
Lore
Moderator ā








- Dec 14, 2015
- 45,627
- 67,850
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 0
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
I would argue the ridiculous grading of it as medium impact should be challenged, and we should also challenge the suggestion it meets the criteria for dangerous tackle:
ā3. Rough Conduct (Dangerous Tackles)
The application of a tackle may be considered Rough Conduct which is unreasonable in the circumstances. In determining whether the application of a tackle constitutes a Reportable Offence and whether the offence is Careless or Intentional, without limitation, regard may be had to the following factors, whether:
Ā» The tackle consists of more than one action, regardless of whether the Player being tackled is in possession of the ball;
Ā» The tackle is of an inherently dangerous kind, such as a spear tackle or a tackle where a Player is lifted off the ground;
Ā» The Player being tackled is in a vulnerable position (e.g. arm(s) pinned) with little opportunity to protect himself;
Ā» An opponent is slung, driven or rotated into the ground with excessive force"
While the list above suggests it is 'without limitation' it clearly identifies the type of actions that should constitute rough conduct for a tackle. In this case:
1) there is a single action;
2) the tackle is not inherently dangerous - there is no spearing or lifting;
3) Bontempelli is not in a vulnerable position as intended by the purpose of the rules (being arm's pinned or no opportunity to protect). Any vulnerability or lack of protection is created by Bontempelli, not by the tackler. He has every opportunity to use his free hand to brace any impact, but chooses to hold the ball instead. This should be no different to if a player had both hands free when tackled and chose not to brace, whether holding on to the ball or otherwise. I can't see any way that scenario should be treated as a player in a vulnerable position, and likewise Bontempelli's choice to hold on to the ball to try and avoid a free kick against him should not give rise to a conclusion that he was in a vulnerable position. Otherwise any player tackled is by definition in a vulnerable position and the use of this example/category is redundant.
4) the only question is whether there is a 'sling' in the way he is brought to ground. In this case, even if you could say there is a slight sling (as every tackle almost has to have to avoid an in the back or a spear tackle), in no way should this be considered 'excessive'. The force looks to be the basic amount to bring him down, and nothing more.
In summary, no suspension, retrospective free kick to the Dons and a home final.
Well Buddy did get a week before it got downgraded, which I suspect Redman will get too. Dont know which Merrett one you're talking about.
Who did that?This is the correct answer. Also, the Laws of the Game make no mention of āhead hitting the ground firstā so anyone claiming that by copying and pasting from some extraneous source is objectively wrong.
Well Buddy did get a week before it got downgraded, which I suspect Redman will get too. Dont know which Merrett one you're talking about.
Surely you can gif it for meHe was tackled by one of the Baileys on the 50 at the city end and spun into the ground. 11:50 odd in the following video:
![]()
one arm pinned, slung, head hits the ground.
I have no idea how Redman is medium if Selwood is low.Look, I don't have an issue with them looking after players heads, I have an issue with the bloody maddeningly inconsistency with which it's applied. Sellwood runs through a blokes head with his hip and gets a fine? They're having a laf.
Sorry 100% Iād call it holding the ball. Had prior or assumed prior given the fend off (which actually appears to hit redman high).Do you pay a free kick against Bont for dropping or is it play on is what I'm asking.
Who did that?
DEROI'd need to know an IT guy for that![]()
I do wonder if the whiplash secondary impact is worse sometimes. Ie shoulder hits and head slams down on the follow through.People on social media.
It isn't fun. I wasn't concussed but yeah, not funI do wonder if the whiplash secondary impact is worse sometimes. Ie shoulder hits and head slams down on the follow through.
I do wonder if the whiplash secondary impact is worse sometimes. Ie shoulder hits and head slams down on the follow through.
I have no idea how Redman is medium if Selwood is low.
It's quite easy to distinguish those 2 incidents. If you look really carefully in slow motion, you can see that Selwood is a 3 time premiership captain.I have no idea how Redman is medium if Selwood is low.
Spot on.Iām finding it really hard to continue caring for this once great game atm.
So many inconsistencies that can only be deliberate on the part of the adjudicators depending on whoops charged and who the āvictimā is.
Absolute joke.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Totally agree..........letās see what our club does......Brasher itās your time......say something......This would be a nice time for Brasher to come out and stand up for the club like he said would be happening.
Looks far worse than the Redman one. Play on!Surely you can gif it for me![]()