VelvetSledge
Moderator
- May 24, 2007
- 17,860
- 36,721
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Liverpool FC, Melbourne Storm
- Moderator
- #305
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can we pin this so people stop asking why we spent our second rounder to move up! Relish in the fact we identified our guy and did what we needed to get him.Twomey mentioned in the recap that other clubs were trying to trade up to Geelong's pick. It was a smart move to secure the man we wanted (and need).
I do reckon we gave away 31 for nothing as Geelong would have known caddy was who we wanted but he is an exciting talent. Good luck Nate!Can we pin this so people stop asking why we spent our second rounder to move up! Relish in the fact we identified our guy and did what we needed to get him.
Move on.
Geelong we’re not gonna trade their pick if they wanted Caddy. I’d say we outbid someone trying to jump us to get himI do reckon we gave away 31 for nothing as Geelong would have known caddy was who we wanted but he is an exciting talent. Good luck Nate!
Perhaps didn't even outbid, as such; but being the one back meant they were guaranteed their man whilst also getting a nice little bonus.Geelong we’re not gonna trade their pick if they wanted Caddy. I’d say we outbid someone trying to jump us to get him
Cats had been feeding the media a month about wanting to trade back and we'd likely have intel about who wants in. So be it if we did fall for a bluff for a bloke who is a massive need with an enormous ceiling. Last thing we need was to miss out on another Oliver because we are worried about drafting the next Alex Morgan.I do reckon we gave away 31 for nothing as Geelong would have known caddy was who we wanted but he is an exciting talent. Good luck Nate!
Blooz fans think he will be playing for them in 3 years.
No idea really. Why do Blooz fans do anything? Been a few comments on Facebook saying this. Did he support them?Why?
That is the problem with highlights. He is certainly a lot more athletic than Francis.Highlights look like Francis minus the exciting stuff.
Can someone paste that article from the age about us being "really aggressive"?
I think Caddy will be very good for the Dons, however, did you need to give pick 31 away to move up 1 place? If Geelong had wanted Caddy they would not have agreed to the trade. This suggests the cats were not going to pick Caddy.
What a horrible decision moving up was. Should've sat still and waited for best available which has worked brilliantly for the last two decades.
Blooz fans think he will be playing for them in 3 years.
Surprised we didn't trade for Caddy... future 1st and our two picks tonight should have got it done with 10 and a future 2nd or some pick swaps.
Nepotism
Caddy is the second best key fwd in the draft from what I gather. Charlie-esq. Tho he plays for * now so he's a spud.
It sucks that the cheats get Nate Caddy.
More like Jack Darling than Charlie Curnow?The reputed Curnow-like athleticism doesn't really come through in his highlights reels - by all accounts he runs and jumps really well and the combine seemed to validate this. Good agility result as well.I have no concerns re his height - good leap and good length....he'll play taller than 192 cm or whatever he is. Seems to have a big, natural frame that will fill out and carry weight easily.
I was hoping for Wilson (who I think will quickly be seen a shaving slid too far when season starts) but let's see what he can do. I can understand why they took him.
Dunno....haven't seen enough. Most of his highlight reels are just mark and kick stuff where he pushes someone under the ball.....get no real sense of his athleticism. I'm not saying he doesn't have it....just that I have seen it in what I've watched of him.More like Jack Darling than Charlie Curnow?
Well he'll need to get that out of his game now he's with us and not Geelong.where he pushes someone under the ball