I'm sorry but when the **** did Goodes sneak into this category? Harvey is at least as good or better than Goodes.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'll let you put that to a vote
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I'm sorry but when the **** did Goodes sneak into this category? Harvey is at least as good or better than Goodes.
I'm sorry but when the **** did Goodes sneak into this category? Harvey is at least as good or better than Goodes.
Goodes is so much better than Brent Harvey its not funny....wtf is wrong with you
Harvey is a great player but i have him along side the likes of Tyson Edwards who was also a great player
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'll let you put that to a vote
Wooah when is the rest of your comedy show?
I love it when posters can bag out North's players so much and say we overrate our list when we disagree but when we turn the tables, they do the exact same thing we did.
Hint: Goodes is not as good as you think he is. He's on the tier below Voss, Hird and Buckley, though I think Buckley is more on the rung in between the two.
I would place goodes there too i agree with thar, but i honestly believe no one outside of norths members has harvey near him
U r correct in a way though everyones entitled to a view and even if say i get 9/10 to agree with me it still isnt fact
Harvey and Goodes are apples and oranges. One's 190cm+ while the other is around 169cm. Different players, different positions.
Yup true but ones output and standing in the game would be higher especially in big games, 2 brownlows 2 flags and he can play harveys position as well as a key position
I love it when posters can bag out North's players so much and say we overrate our list when we disagree but when we turn the tables, they do the exact same thing we did.
Hint: Goodes is not as good as you think he is. He's on the tier below Voss, Hird and Buckley, though I think Buckley is more on the rung in between the two.
lol good one - haha
In 2003 - 08 B Harvey was 25 - 30 years old and physically in the prime of his career while Harvey was 32 - 37 year old with his best behind him. Yet R Harvey still only averaged less than 2 assists a year less than B Harvey despite being in decline and not the same player he was in 1994-1999.
Again comparing a player in his prime (20 - 30) to one on the decline (albeit still a very very good player)
It's funny that Harvey stacks up reasonably well despite the majority of his accolades such as his 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 AA selections, his 1992, 1994, 1997 B&F wins, his 1997 Brownlow and 1997 MVP were won outside of this period.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'll let you put that to a vote
Goodes has never excelled playing in a key position. He struggled at CHB, mainly because they tried to hide him there when he was carrying an injury. He has been okay at times as a tall forward without ever setting the world on fire. He once bagged 8 goals vs Freo, the only time he ever kicked more than 4 goals in a game, but he never held down a key forward post for any length of time.Yup true but ones output and standing in the game would be higher especially in big games, 2 brownlows 2 flags and he can play harveys position as well as a key position
Goodes has never excelled playing in a key position. .
If you kept reading, you'd know I said he played ruck, but I qualified this. In terms of actual ruckwork, Goodes was more like Jarryd Roughead than Nic Naitanui. More of an oversized ruck-rover - he provided a contest and was effective with 2nd and 3rd efforts, but he didn't control the hit outs.Stopped reading there, he won a brownlow and all australian in the ruck, given your love for bagging goodes out i dont think your opinion is worth much
If you kept reading, you'd know I said he played ruck, but I qualified this. As ruckman, Goodes was more like Jarryd Roughead than Nic Naitanui. More of an oversized ruck-rover - he provided a contest and was effective with 2nd and 3rd efforts, but he didn't control the hit outs.
You're the biased twat who thinks Adam Goodes is a god while underselling Brent Harvey's achievements, so don't talk to me about opinions that aren't worth much. I rate Goodes as a champion, but you Sydney clowns act as though he is superior to every other champion. Get your hand off it.
Hahahah, you Sydney fans are the ones who can't "move on" from last year's Grand Final. You're the ones who keep bringing it up. I've always had a fairly consistent opinion of Goodes. It hasn't really changed much over the years, probably because he hasn't changed much over years.All i said was goodes was beter than harvey i didnt throw him in with any all time greats, far from it, also didnt undersell harveys achievements, the only one who went on a rant trying to diminish someones achievement was you about goodes, the fact he carved your team up on one leg last year seems to have you obsessed, move on.
Best and fairests
Goodes - 2003, 2006, 2011
Harvey - 2003, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2010
.
No, just talking footy. I saw Swans fans potting Harvey and talking about Goodes at the top of the page, so I thought I would add my 2 cents.Fancy Chewy obsessing over Goodes.
No, just talking footy. I saw Swans fans potting Harvey and talking about Goodes at the top of the page, so I thought I would add my 2 cents.
It doesn't matter which player or club I'm talking about, people always think I'm obsessing. Fans of Sydney, Geelong, Essendon, Collingwood, Richmond, Carlton, Melbourne, North, West Coast, Fremantle and even GWS and Gold Coast have got stuck into me for my "obsession" and "hatred" of their club.
It's just footy chat, mate.
What's your point?Best and fairests
Teague - 2004
Franklin - 2008