Rodney Dangerfield
Doesn’t matter
I'm not sure .... but I reckon Ricky Nixon mightn't like norf...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
It's actually really sad when you think about it.1.5m per year for one player is stupid enough as it is. Anything more you probably need to check yourself in somewhere.
When he stays with us and turns down an extra $3m from Norf their supporters will finally realise just how much of a basket case the club is.
Incredible stuff.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why would they up it if we supposedly are already $2mill off their offer? What a load of ****ing shit.Chanel 7 just said the Norf offer is now 3 million more than ours, it goes up every day, amazing.
They've got to have a crack I guess. Martin would be as much about selling the club to kids too.How no one in the media is questioning the stupidity of lolnorf is beyond me, they are bottom from tomorrow and are selling the farm for one player with a shed load of spuds on their list. if it were us the media would be slamming us and calling us irresponsible.
They've probably rounded 2.8m up to 3m. LolWhy would they up it if we supposedly are already $2mill off their offer? What a load of ******* shit.
I was not going to respond to you as obviously by your post count you are a alt account and do not have the balls/integrity to post what you are on your main account. Firstly the term media and how you use it, has me confused. You state the media were adamant that dusty signing was far from done ( which really was only C7) while the rest more reputable media reporters like Denham,KB,Caro etc all thought his signing was happening soon as we lifted our offer...so which media are you referring and can you link proof so i can gauge your time line ?
The reality is pretty simple. I said so in my podcast and also on here. We wont move from 1.2 million. If Norfs offer is just 1.5m, he will stay IMO as 300k a year more wont be enough to shift him. If Norf continue to show the desperation they have by offering these ridiculous sums of money and lift to 1.6 or 1.7 a year for 7 years...well I will personally say good bye myself to Dusty as that is way to much coin to ignore and it would be fair compensation for him not playing in finals or contending in his prime footy years which is the next 2-4 years.
Now to this bullshit you norf fools keep going on about how this was planned and you will front load as you are struggling to pay players now anyway etc etc. If that was the case, you would not have 8 players, some of who are loyal servants for years at your club being told...sorry we dont know what we can pay you till Dusty tells us, so brace yourselves as you may need to wait till october. If you could easily fit these players you would be re singing them, you are not and that speaks volumes to the truth. Anyone with half a brain can work that out. Lastly its no surprise, even though the tigers are dealing with Dusty, like norf, unlike norf, we are re signing our players during it...we know what we can afford, we have planned for a raid such as this.
Lastly we would not be at the afl getting approval for outside income streams for Dusty, similar to the blues with Judd, if A Carr is not aware of it and B we have been told to do it as that will allow us to secure Dusty services.
The way i see it, the only way we lose Dusty is if we stay at 1.1.or 1.2 and do not get approval for the corporate income to not be included in the cap like Judd and Visy and norf offer is the reported 1.6 plus per year for 7 years.
Last bit, i am still confident the tigers and Dusty can work out a solution to this. For the record I am not the only one saying that, a lot of more knowledgeable people that have been in the industry for years are saying the same thing. Some even on this very board have proof of that too.
You'd like to think so...but let's be honest, right now it's questionable.They've got to have a crack I guess. Martin would be as much about selling the club to kids too.
It's not without risks but they aren't ran by imbeciles.
Willing to relocate the club for him as well. Changing their name to Norf Auckland Dustin.
Seen that, common sense will prevail what does that mean?For what its worth I just asked Ricky Nixon the following question on twitter
and I got the following answer only a few minutes ago
How no one in the media is questioning the stupidity of lolnorf is beyond me, they are bottom from tomorrow and are selling the farm for one player with a shed load of spuds on their list. if it were us the media would be slamming us and calling us irresponsible.
According to the Media, AFL, RFC, NMFC, Twitter flogs, whoever else has the ability to create bullshit...
Our final offer however reported is 1.2/7
#lolnorfs is 1.5/7
That is a 2.1 mil difference over the 7 years. Not ******* 3 mil.
Seen that, common sense will prevail what does that mean?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Seen that, common sense will prevail what does that mean?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Media is now reporting our offer is 1.1, not 1.2. Don't know how it keeps on changing by the week.
Cause the media are full of shit campaignersMedia is now reporting our offer is 1.1, not 1.2. Don't know how it keeps on changing by the week.
Wayne Carey didn't like the offer and Dalsanto said it was border line tipping point was the phrase he usedHow no one in the media is questioning the stupidity of lolnorf is beyond me, they are bottom from tomorrow and are selling the farm for one player with a shed load of spuds on their list. if it were us the media would be slamming us and calling us irresponsible.
Seen that, common sense will prevail what does that mean?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk