He is the most powerful man in the world, and he once met Marlon Brando.
Watch and learn.
Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 7 - Trump takes full responsibility.
- Thread starter Crow54
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Watch and learn.
- Oct 20, 2014
- 19,396
- 20,998
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
And you’re the master at it.
Another great day with trump winning again. It’s getting embarrassing for the Dems. Just keep losing anything Trump. I’ve never seen such a powerful President. Seriously how tough can a man get.
For someone who believed the walls are closing in on Trump at the start of the year you sure look pretty stupid right now.
But I'm not surprised you thought Kavanagh was a pack rapist aswell.
Media?
How are them Democratic Democrats doing?
Rinse and repeat........they ^ are now calling Rosenstein and Barr who have now seen the report to testify before Congress.
They don't believe the ATTORNEY GENERAL should have the right to make these decisions. LOL!!
Before that Sessions was Recused for two years..... well that suited them just fine.
Anything else the Democrats want because they didn't get their way?
Very Undemocratic Seeds very undemocratic!
Last edited:
ChappyUK
Cancelled
30k Posts
10k Posts
BeanCoiNFT Investor
Song Contest Winner - 5+ Rounds
Podcaster
Pokemon is Life
Pantskyle
I always thought Nicola Sturgeon's dummy spit after the Scottish Referendum didn't go her way was the best I've seen. These guys put her to shame. Shifty and Nadler are overtaking Schumer and Pelosi and the Dems greatest comedy double.
Downhill Skier
Team Captain
With the week he is having I wouldn't be surprised at anything at the moment.
No Collusion
Avenatti arrested
CNN legal analyst as co-conspirator with Avenatti
1bn for the wall
and finally the Justice Department siding with the district court that ruled Obamacare unconstitutional today.
He is on a roll at the moment
Last edited:
- Banned
- #9,562
Don't kid yourself, Hilary ignored the majority of the country and got pulverised as a result. Nothing short of a humiliation.
True speaking of Nadler.
"It is unnaceptable that after the Special Council Meuller spent 22 months meticulously uncovering this evidence A.G Barr made a desicion not to prosecute the President in under 48 hours"
Are they even making sense anymore...
#releasethereport.
Last edited:
twotooto
late bloomer
- Sep 26, 2015
- 2,466
- 5,749
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Just staggered that the Dems spent 18 months trying to impeach Trump. Clearly they thought they would have him impeached within 3 or 4 months of his tenure. And when they didn't get it they kept on persisting with it. And, due to big egos and bloody mindedness, they will continue to persist with that tactic, guaranteed. Just mind bogglingly stupid.
The entire PR/marketing dept should be sacked. They need to forget about discrediting and impeaching Trump. It simply will not happen. It was never going to happen.
Love or hate Trump, he presents as a consistent head/leader of his party. On the other hand, the Dems present as an absolute shambles. It seems like every other week there's a new candidate - and that in itself seems to be a knee jerk reaction to whatever issue is currently trending on social media. Absolute farce.
Forget about the god damn impeachment. No matter how guilty Trump is, or isn't. It. Simply. Will. Not. Happen.
I mean it's happened before(Nixon?) but that is once in a blue moon type stuff, 5 or 6 decades ago. Vastly different political landscape now and even if it does happen, the perception is that that is all the Dems have. ****ing crazy shit. Where is the plan B? How about looking forward instead of back?
Politics isn't about right or wrong, it's about perception. It's not about what things are, it's about what things appear to be. Trump has royally schooled the Dems. He loves it when they get in to the trough with him. He owns the little piggie trough. He'll always come out looking squeaky clean(again = perception). The Dems have what, a year to change course and come up with, firstly, a united front and secondly some direction other than discrediting Trump. I am betting dollars to doughnuts that that will not happen.
The entire PR/marketing dept should be sacked. They need to forget about discrediting and impeaching Trump. It simply will not happen. It was never going to happen.
Love or hate Trump, he presents as a consistent head/leader of his party. On the other hand, the Dems present as an absolute shambles. It seems like every other week there's a new candidate - and that in itself seems to be a knee jerk reaction to whatever issue is currently trending on social media. Absolute farce.
Forget about the god damn impeachment. No matter how guilty Trump is, or isn't. It. Simply. Will. Not. Happen.
I mean it's happened before(Nixon?) but that is once in a blue moon type stuff, 5 or 6 decades ago. Vastly different political landscape now and even if it does happen, the perception is that that is all the Dems have. ****ing crazy shit. Where is the plan B? How about looking forward instead of back?
Politics isn't about right or wrong, it's about perception. It's not about what things are, it's about what things appear to be. Trump has royally schooled the Dems. He loves it when they get in to the trough with him. He owns the little piggie trough. He'll always come out looking squeaky clean(again = perception). The Dems have what, a year to change course and come up with, firstly, a united front and secondly some direction other than discrediting Trump. I am betting dollars to doughnuts that that will not happen.
ChappyUK
Cancelled
30k Posts
10k Posts
BeanCoiNFT Investor
Song Contest Winner - 5+ Rounds
Podcaster
Pokemon is Life
Pantskyle
So he has to take 22 months to produce his summary according to Nadler.
Also as the head of the Intelligence Committee, Shifty has to release any information he has that he has said indicts Trump or he needs to resign.
Taylor
Community Leader
- Moderator
- #9,567
I don't think they wanted to impeach Trump, I think the real motive was to keep the discussion on him about very negative things. They don't need to be true but people are wired to believe some of it, you'll get some traction with that and he will be tarnished.
Democrat voters respond really well to a feeling of superiority so you rub that genie bottle and it won't require discussing why so many didn't turn out for Clinton. Look anywhere but there.
I said it previously but they've managed to turn the discovery of them having an affair in the backyard spa into a story about someone looking over the fence.
Democrat voters respond really well to a feeling of superiority so you rub that genie bottle and it won't require discussing why so many didn't turn out for Clinton. Look anywhere but there.
I said it previously but they've managed to turn the discovery of them having an affair in the backyard spa into a story about someone looking over the fence.
ChappyUK
Cancelled
30k Posts
10k Posts
BeanCoiNFT Investor
Song Contest Winner - 5+ Rounds
Podcaster
Pokemon is Life
Pantskyle
Dems can't win in their current state. They are in civil war and the only thing uniting them is a hatred of Trump. They have the hard left in the Justice Democrats trying to oust the establishment. The primaries are going to be ugly but fun to watch.
twotooto
late bloomer
- Sep 26, 2015
- 2,466
- 5,749
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Only way Trump doesn't win in 2020 is if a) he doesn't run or b) the Dems get their shit together - and that ain't happening.
22 months to produce a summary most of it Without an Attorney General mind you...... that the Democrats were more than happy about.
Rosenstein had free reign all that time on parameters of Investigation.
Let that sink in.
- Sep 21, 2009
- 18,248
- 16,713
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Can't we all just accept that the current outcome of the Muller report seems to vindicate Trump and his enthusiasts?
You can't defend Muller for months, and then cast aspersions on his report (or the report of his report).
The same way you can't vilify Muller for months, and then defend his report (or the report of his report).
As is. Muller's report has pointed out that Russia did deliberately "spread distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general".
That was Russia's original and ongoing goal.
With the slightest flick of the wrist, both 'sides' have flipped positions and are arguing opposite points. Where is the critical thinking?
Creating disunity must be one of the easiest jobs going right now.
Why can't we say that just because we agree or disagree with authority/goverment... we still hold them to the same account?
You can't defend Muller for months, and then cast aspersions on his report (or the report of his report).
The same way you can't vilify Muller for months, and then defend his report (or the report of his report).
As is. Muller's report has pointed out that Russia did deliberately "spread distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general".
That was Russia's original and ongoing goal.
With the slightest flick of the wrist, both 'sides' have flipped positions and are arguing opposite points. Where is the critical thinking?
Creating disunity must be one of the easiest jobs going right now.
Why can't we say that just because we agree or disagree with authority/goverment... we still hold them to the same account?
Serious question - the Democrats were only looking to be a benefactor from the outcome of such an investigation. Who ordered the investigation? Was it the dems or GOP appointed officials?
we have 2 different concern you have conflated. First concern was a John Hewson unlosable general election that they lost to PJK. They launched into revisionism 101 agitprop with the DNC and HRC, Podesta, Mook blaming Russia and rigging and a dutiful 4thEstate fall in line for a full blown Goebbels Bernays project. They seduced the beltway and coastal elites into "belief" of a genuine impeachment. Now they have marginalised the other half of the population who know WaPo and NYTimes and CNBC are full of it. And given DT significant advantage for reelection and two-term POTUS
Last edited:
Shattered
View attachment 368721
http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-that-brutalizes-the-clinton-campaign-w477978
Taibbi
View attachment 368721
http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-that-brutalizes-the-clinton-campaign-w477978
Taibbi
What Allen and Parnes captured in Shattered was a far more revealing portrait of the Democratic Party intelligentsia than, say, the WikiLeaks dumps. And while the book is profoundly unflattering to Hillary Clinton, the problem it describes really has nothing to do with Secretary Clinton.
Breitbart
The new Clinton campaign tell-all, Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign, reveals how Hillary Clinton personally placed blame for her bruising defeat on Russian meddling “within twenty-four hours of her concession speech.”
The blistering behind-the-scenes book, by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, illustrates how Hillary Clinton furiously blamed her defeat on the FBI investigation into her private emails, Russian interference, and Trump’s supposed support from “white nationalists.”
From Shattered:
On a phone call with a longtime friend a couple of days after the election, Hillary was much less accepting of her defeat. She put a fine point on the factors she believed cost her the presidency: the FBI (Comey), the KGB (the old name for Russia’s intelligence service), and the KKK (the support Trump got from white nationalists).
“I’m angry,” Hillary told her friend. And exhausted. After two brutal campaigns against Sanders and Trump, Hillary now had to explain the failure to friends in a seemingly endless round of phone calls. That was taking a toll on her already weary and grief-stricken soul. But mostly, she was mad— mad that she’d lost and that the country would have to endure a Trump presidency.
The authors detail how Clinton went out of her way to pass blame for her stunning loss on “Comey and Russia.”
“She wants to make sure all these narratives get spun the right way,” a longtime Clinton confidant is quoted as saying.
The book further highlights how Clinton’s Russia-blame-game was a plan hatched by senior campaign staffers John Podesta and Robby Mook, less than “within twenty-four hours” after she conceded:
That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech. Mook and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.
The Clinton camp settled on a two-pronged plan — pushing the press to cover how “Russian hacking was the major unreported story of the campaign, overshadowed by the contents of stolen e-mails and Hillary’s own private-server imbroglio,” while “hammering the media for focusing so intently on the investigation into her e-mail, which had created a cloud over her candidacy,” the authors wrote.
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
