A not guilty verdict absolutely does mean innocent in the eyes of the law. Unless you can demonstrate that there has been a miscarriage of justice (as in the Simpson case), he is innocent.
-
Guest - BigFooty Tipping 2025 - Get on! - $500 first prize - Weekly Prizes - Click to Join
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 7 - Trump takes full responsibility.
- Thread starter Crow54
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
A not guilty verdict absolutely does mean innocent in the eyes of the law. Unless you can demonstrate that there has been a miscarriage of justice (as in the Simpson case), he is innocent.
Del191229
He bangs the drums
30k Posts
Veteran
10k Posts
North Melbourne - 2021 Taylor Garner and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2020 Taylor Garner and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2020 Aileen Gilroy Player Sponsor
- Aug 21, 2018
- 33,007
- 83,145
Option C - lifelong Republican Mueller lets Republican President off.
Downhill Skier
Team Captain
You know that is only related to the Obstruction of Justice accusation's and nothing to do with the Russian Collusion allegations
To be fair - he is only 2 and a bit years into his first term.
Why would an exchange like that be in the report? He is only going to report things if they do find something of interest. If a dead body is found the police will go door knocking and ask people if they saw anything. They arent going to put the names and details of people who had no information in the police report.I'll give you a hypothetical.
Let us say a cia agent has infiltrated russian intelligence.
Mueller finds out about this agent and emails him:
- Oh hai FBi here. Did Trumpy collude with them russkis?
- Re: Oh hai FBi here. Did Trumpy collude with them russkis.
**** off dickhead you are going to get me killed.
If that exchange is in the report, then the agents life is in danger and also the operation he's on may be compromised, even though there is no actual intel that Trump has done anything...
And even if something was found from a source that needs to be protected, they simply wont list who the source is. It doesnt stop the report of what the source found from going public. Journalists protect sources all the time yet they still publish stories.
You are going to need to find much better reasons to hide the report.
Engimal v3
Premium Gold
can@Kiss_Steph mimic that sentiment? I can't take credit for the mash-up, my wildean drollery ends with distorted po'mo acronyms like HormoneReplacementClinton and Chelsea Trigger brothers surfboards; prosaic much
/grammar
- Banned
- #9,536
Knew it all along, no evidence, no collusion. Stop listening to bullshit mainstream media people.
For the sad cases on here who can't accept reality, just admit Hilary was an absolute disaster who was rejected by the majority and move on.
For the sad cases on here who can't accept reality, just admit Hilary was an absolute disaster who was rejected by the majority and move on.
I'll give you a hypothetical.
Let us say a cia agent has infiltrated russian intelligence.
Mueller finds out about this agent and emails him:
- Oh hai FBi here. Did Trumpy collude with them russkis?
- Re: Oh hai FBi here. Did Trumpy collude with them russkis.
**** off dickhead you are going to get me killed.
If that exchange is in the report, then the agents life is in danger and also the operation he's on may be compromised, even though there is no actual intel that Trump has done anything...
you give Socratic method fallacy new material for explicating the reductio ad absurum fallacy
Last edited:
Treason doth never prosper.
I would not want to be on the wrong side of The Don, just at the minute!
Many many sleepless nights for many many politicians.
Thank you.
Spreading a false conspiracy about russian collusion based on a fake dossier and lying to congress and the media that they "know Trump colluded with russia" in an effort to build sentiment towards impeaching a validly elected president who has not committed any misconduct?
What the fu***? This is dictator supporter sh*** you are spouting. Investigations dont have to proove guilt to justify themselves. Otherwise why bother with the investigation in the first place. No one is questioning whether there was just cause to open an investigation. We all know that Donald Trump junior met with russians about leaked emails in his dads hotel and lied about it. That alone was enough to justify a major investigation. However we have far far more than that to justify an investigation. It was the republicans that opened this investigation remember. Not the democrats. Your post is incredibly undemocratic its scary.
If we should stop listening to the mainstream media who should we listen too? Or should we just take the governments word as gospel?
Why? Trump has no power to charge anyone?
Like pizzagate. You mean like that?
My word - what a marvellous fantasy that must be.
- Oct 20, 2014
- 19,436
- 21,056
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
How are those criminal charges going Maggie? They’re indictments and nothing will ever come of them. These so called Russian hackers lawyered up and they couldn’t even tell them what the charges were. Lying is bad for you.
<popcorn.gif> do you spell gif as gif or giph? hard g or non-hard flaccid g.
Rejected by the majority but won the popular vote by 3 million? Oookkkkaaayyyy.....
- Oct 20, 2014
- 19,436
- 21,056
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Covering their arse time and you know it. It’s alright to be wrong Chief.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
