Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 9 - The Shi'ites Hit The Fan (Cont. in Part 10, see OP)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
No. They're the dumbest f***ers on this planet. I'm surprised there are still people on this board trying to argue in good faith with these morons.
I know right...I mean...all those things people in here said that Trump should be impeached for...and not a single 1 has happened.

It must be:

1. a conspiracy/cover up
2. maybe you're the dumb ones :$

A bit of self awareness perhaps.
 
Quid pro quo isn't the threshold. Mere solicitation is illegal.

That might be what the law says but how people behave is more complex.

If the law was as black and white as you seem to think then we wouldn't need lawyers or court proceedings.

The release of the whistleblower complaint shows why the whole story needs to be investigated.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Out of all that of course you pick Pizzagate and #whatabouthillary

Why did you leave out the deranged Birther conspiracy - a fire that Trump himself fanned?
You mean Barrack Hussain II from Kenya :think:

kenyacert.jpg
:think:
 
Yes its hard to defend Polozi going after Biden in this manner. Exposing one of Obama's CIA spies in the process. Sad state of affairs you'd agree.
Conspiracies board please.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You mean Barrack Hussain II from Kenya :think:

kenyacert.jpg
:think:

Lol.

On August 2, 2009, Orly Taitz released and attached to court documents a purported Kenyan birth certificate. The document was almost immediately revealed to be a forgery. It purports to have been issued by the "Republic of Kenya", when in fact, such a state did not yet exist at the time of Obama's birth as indicated on the document (Kenya was a British Colony until 1963).

Subsequently, evidence was unearthed that the alleged Kenyan birth certificate was a modified version of a 1959 Australian birth certificate found on an online genealogy website. The Washington Independent website cited an anonymous blogger as having taken responsibility for the forgery and posting four photos substantiating his claim

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barac...piracy_theories#Fake_Kenyan_birth_certificate

Thought it looked familiar.

Also; goodbye.
 
Is this your latest attempt at making an argument?

Are you just going to throw turds at the wall in the hope one sticks?

For someone who likes telling us how educated you are, you have a narrow understanding of law and legal processes.

You don't seem to understand the reason why we have court proceedings and lawyers when in your view it is has simple as following the letter of the law.

Some lawyers like to follow the letter of the law while others prefer to focus on the intent of the law or those that made that law.

As I've repeatable said this needs a full investigation.
 
For someone who likes telling us how educated you are, you have a narrow understanding of law and legal processes.

You don't seem to understand the reason why we have court proceedings and lawyers when in your view it is has simple as following the letter of the law.

Some lawyers like to follow the letter of the law while others prefer to focus on the intent of the law or those that made that law.
Your interpretive tap dance is embarrassing. In criminal law, we have court proceedings to establish/present the facts to ultimately make a judgement about guilt or innocence and because people are entitled to defend themselves against the state's charges.

Your undergraduate spiel about "human behaviour" has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

It's just another episode of you tying yourself in knots because you don't have a grasp of the basic facts. So you have to make it about something else, rather than acknowledge you don't know what you're talking about.
 
Your interpretive tap dance is embarrassing. In criminal law, we have court proceedings to establish/present the facts to ultimately make a judgement about guilt or innocence and because people are entitled to defend themselves against the state's charges.

Your undergraduate spiel about "human behaviour" has nothing to to with the subject at hand.

It's just another episode of you tying yourself in knots because you don't have a grasp of the basic facts. So you have to make it about something else, rather than acknowledge you don't know what you're talking about.

Huh the only knots I see are from you trying to justify your undergraduate understanding of law and how people behave in the real world.

I have constantly written there needs a full investigation, the fact you don't understand that or that you didn't know about Biden's son tells me you are narrowly focused.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top