Of course, makes perfect sense.
You've clearly formed a position based on available information.
You definitely haven't formed a position and then gone back looking for snippets to support it.
You know that it’s possible that some people take information and don’t end up drawing the same conclusions as you? And that coming to different conclusions isn’t of itself an act of bad faith?
It's amazing that Sanders could have fixed all of this and been the first US President since '45 that shouldn't have been sent to The Hague.
I know you didn't say it, but I assume Hillary should also have been sent to The Hague?
He probably would’ve gone to The Hague. Again, you argue against things I don’t say. What I did say was that it’s the closest opportunity we’ve had to getting a transformative leader. He mightn’t have worked out, but he definitely threatened the status quo, which is why they did their best to deny him winning.
And yes, Hillary was Secretary of State, a group who would overwhelmingly be in the same boat as presidents.
Biden is a monster, and arguably the worst outcome of the 2020 US election.
Cambodia is unforgivable, but at the same time Nixon did pull himself up by his bootstraps. Roger Stone is a reasonable person.
And we all know Johnson would have handled the last four years as US president in almost the opposite way to Biden.
“The worst outcome of the 2020 US election”
“Roger Stone is a reasonable person”
You know, if you want to use my words against me, you shouldn’t have to throw in this shit.
If George Washington was in Biden’s position he’d be wondering why a black woman was his Vice President. No historical record will have Biden as a better president than Washington. You judge them for what they oversaw.
I was asked who were the five best presidents of the last century, not who I thought were good ones or who weren’t monsters.
The quality Johnson had that Biden could’ve done with was the ability to pull into line difficult Senators. I don’t think the Manchin and Sinema issues would have played out the same way with a more ambitious President willing to wield power to achieve great things.
Looking at Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump and Biden... there's so little separating them that it's impossible to say if one was better than the other.
But Biden's probably the worst, as he's the reason Sanders didn't win in 2020, and he facilitated the genocide in Gaza.
None of this is ahistorical.
Again making things up.
I’ve repeatedly said Bush was the worst President in my lifetime. Perhaps ever. i also differentiated Trump (for the worse) from the others in the post you’re taking from.
Anyway, I note your argument that Biden “arguably saved the US economy. And gave the US some credit again as a world power.” I’m not sure I agree but if you believe it then those are fair reasons to rate him well comparatively, though I would make the case that trying to return the US to the same material conditions that saw Trump got elected would likely cause that to happen again, which seems inherently flawed.