True but rfk is likely to take biden votes .Both have no better or worse credentials than the current GOP guy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True but rfk is likely to take biden votes .Both have no better or worse credentials than the current GOP guy
Rfk jnr running as 3rd party interference looking at aaron rodgers jets quarterback and jessie ventura ex wrestler as potential running mates lol
Rfk jnr running as 3rd party interference looking at aaron rodgers jets quarterback and jessie ventura ex wrestler as potential running mates lol
What about Ace Ventura?Jesse Ventura was Governor of Minnesota and would have been a better candidate for president than either Trump or Biden. I hope he has a bit more self-respect than being Kennedy’s VP candidate.
Alrighty then! now we are talking!What about Ace Ventura?
absolutely. even though the dems could have done so much better.
* shakes head *does 249 years count the 4 years Trump already served?
well its important to know! Apparently the world is going to end if the orange guy gets in, even though he already served for 4 years!shakes head
He learnt a lot when in office and has made mention - out loud - of the things he will do differentwell its important to know! Apparently the world is going to end if the orange guy gets in, even though he already served for 4 years!
I need to know so i can join the virtual signalling!!!
does 249 years count the 4 years Trump already served?
Yep - shame how much America has fallento keep him out, USA'ians should all vote for a geriatric dementia patient who is actively allowing genocide!
that fact that people are wanting to vote for either of them amazes meYep - shame how much America has fallen
It's one or the other, and one is clearly better than the other, even though there's some issues where it's closer to a tie. So in that sense, I would "want" to vote for Biden.that fact that people are wanting to vote for either of them amazes me
Trump was asked the other day if he would support/call for a ceasefire and completely squibbed it, didn't answer the question and just banged on about how it wouldn't have happened under his watch in the first place. Also answered a more general question on Gaza with "you have to finish the problem", so doesn't look like there's much difference between Biden and Trump on the issue.all this is true, and he is orange!
to keep him out, USA'ians should all vote for a geriatric dementia patient who is actively allowing genocide!
For someone that is supposedly on the "both sides are awful" camp, you do spend an awful lot of time on here talking about how 1 is specifically awful.that fact that people are wanting to vote for either of them amazes me
as a non USA'ian, i agree one is better than the other. I take the guy who didnt start any wars and doesnt actively support genocide, even if he is an orange blow-hard.It's one or the other, and one is clearly better than the other, even though there's some issues where it's closer to a tie. So in that sense, I would "want" to vote for Biden.
or, as you put it, you choose between a guy who IS supporting genocide and an guy who MIGHT support genocide.Trump was asked the other day if he would support/call for a ceasefire and completely squibbed it, didn't answer the question and just banged on about how it wouldn't have happened under his watch in the first place. Also answered a more general question on Gaza with "you have to finish the problem", so doesn't look like there's much difference between Biden and Trump on the issue.
So you're left with a choice between a geriatric dementia patient who is actively allowing genocide, and a fashy/authoritarian-curios guy who's already tried to overturn an election, promises he'll only "be a dictator for 1 day" and who according to his own words would also allow a genocide.
Reckon the dementia patient might be the option all things considered, sad as that is.
as a non USA'ian, i agree one is better than the other. I take the guy who didnt start any wars and doesnt actively support genocide, even if he is an orange blow-hard.
but hey, thats just me
And world historyI am amazed how you prefer Trump and are so ignorant of the past 8 years of US Politics.
'MIGHT support' is a pretty generous interpretation of Trump's comments on it.or, as you put it, you choose between a guy who IS supporting genocide and an guy who MIGHT support genocide.
tough choice.
Has drastically reduced drone usage too, in sharp comparison to Trump's record usage and getting rid of rules requiring reporting of civilian casualties.Biden hasn't started any wars. Trump and Republicans are even blinder when it comes to Israel, not to mention Trump's efforts in supporting and defending Saudi Arabia.
But hey, that's just facts.