Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: If you want Capitalism, you got it

When will Trump be finished?

  • Right now. Bloke's a dickhead.

    Votes: 48 43.2%
  • We'll let him run, we'll wipe him out after the election. Be way funnier that way!

    Votes: 12 10.8%
  • At some point, Trump will wipe out all options except for him. Send him to jail.

    Votes: 10 9.0%
  • Needs to be next president of the ICC.

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Clean the swamp, Trump2025!

    Votes: 38 34.2%
  • It's not enough to just elect him, him ahead of anyone else!

    Votes: 2 1.8%

  • Total voters
    111

Remove this Banner Ad

Mod Notice
* Thread monitored actively. User who drag it down will be removed

Specifically: reference to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and its counterpart 'Trumpanzee' or anything similar will no longer be allowed.

Personal attacks are also to be kept to a minimum.

Just a reminder, even if it hasn't come up for a few pages and y'all should know this stuff by now:

This thread is not about Covid, lockdowns, or vaccines. It is about Donald Trump. While Trump was in office during the pandemic and his response to Covid is relevant, there are pertinent threads for you to post your opinions on those things in.

It might also do with reminding a few that when you post on the SRP, you are responsible for backing up/verifying your claims to fact. What this means is that you will be asked time to time to support your claims with evidence, to ensure that this forum is as free of misinfomation as we can make it.

Do not post conspiracy theories on this forum. We have an entire other forum for that.

Thanks all.

As always, please submit ideas for the thread title by tagging Gethelred! We're looking for something new to match the new thread!



< - Trump 19 is back there.
 
Last edited:
The below sounds particularly dystopian. As reported by ABC news.


Federal workers told to dob in colleagues who 'disguise' DEI programs​

By Andrew Thorpe​

The White House isn't just directing federal agencies to eliminate DEI programs (diversity, equity and inclusion), it's also encouraging workers to report on any attempts by their colleagues to "disguise these programs by using coded or imprecise language" — and threatening workers who don't dob in their colleagues with "adverse consequences".
Federal employees are being sent emails by their agency heads that specify they have 10 days to report such instances or face potential disclipinary action.
The emails were based on a template provided by the White House's Office of Personnel Management, according to The New York Times.
So by threatening anyone who doesn’t report supposed DEI programmes-in-disguise, you encourage people to dob in any recruitment process, regardless of how it operates.

The logical end result is that no-one will hire a woman or someone from a minority group (even if they are “the best candidate” according to some mythical concept of meritocracy). And that is quite possibly the intended endgame. Back to straight, white Christian men for everything.
 
This is such a fantastic post.

Anti-DEI sentiment is at best just a basic lack of understanding or at worst thinly veiled prejudice.

But it works so well for the Republicans in the US because it's an easy target for riling up their predominantly straight white base.
Like the recruitment officer at a football club. 17 year olds. Player A might be slightly ahead - attended every junior camp and elite pathways program. Player B - played half a season of Thirds. FD goes with the latter, because given ‘equal opportunity’ he has the greater potential for fulfilling the requirements of the position/organisation. Example: Scott Pendlebury.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Like the recruitment officer at a football club. 17 year olds. Player A might be slightly ahead - attended every junior camp and elite pathways program. Player B - played half a season of Thirds. FD goes with the latter, because given ‘equal opportunity’ he has the greater potential for fulfilling the requirements of the position/organisation. Example: Scott Pendlebury.
Even in this scenario, I have to slightly disagree with the comparison. Proper implementation of DEI in this situation would still be selecting the most suitable player/candidate, or the player with the most upside in a footy scenario.

Part of the misunderstanding is the belief that DEI candidates are selected over more qualified or suitable people just because they fit the criteria or help fill a quota.

A more apt comparison would be that the recruitment department previously ONLY looked at players coming through elite pathways or only private school teams. A DEI program would be put in place to expand the recruiting pool to different regions, looking for qualified players that would improve your team that otherwise would never be considered.
 
America farmers who voted for the "Leopards eat your face party" are now worried that Leopards are coming to eat their face.



hu3vdzzf4mee1.jpeg
 
As in Henry II's exclamation: "Who will rid me of this turbulent priest?"

I reckon on the list of things the church should apologise for, this is right at the bottom of the list.
 
Can they "fire" a Bishop? What a silly person...
No. Well, Trump can't at least.

The idea is to whip up anger at her simply for being consistent with her religion.

Even if she doesn't suffer any employment consequences, it serves as a warning to others who might publicly exercise their freedom of speech and religion, if it doesn't align with Trump.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]" data-quote="troybe" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">


This two-bit huckster really elevates the office of the president to a whole new level

You can pretty much use that picture to say everything that needs to be said about MAGA.
That’s the entire ethos captured in a single moment.
 
yep! i keep saying it but the creep has no redeeming features. not one.

 
So by threatening anyone who doesn’t report supposed DEI programmes-in-disguise, you encourage people to dob in any recruitment process, regardless of how it operates.

The logical end result is that no-one will hire a woman or someone from a minority group (even if they are “the best candidate” according to some mythical concept of meritocracy). And that is quite possibly the intended endgame. Back to straight, white Christian men for everything.
Apart from anything else, it's going to clog up the courts for decades.
 
Does anyone have any sober idea as to why the Bishop should apologise?
Because she wasn't grovelling to Donald Trump in her own church?
There is nothing to apologise for, and they know it.

It's all about getting the baboons hooting.
 
Amazing how many people voted against their self interest. Especially that Trump wasn't exactly hiding these policies ( he pretty much was yelling it from the roof top).

They somehow had the entitlement to think these policies applied to everybody else, but not to them. Rules for thee, not for me.
 
Last edited:
They somehow had the entitlement to think these policies applied to everybody else, but not to them. Rules for thee, not for me.
But that is the essence of MAGA and the people of Sovereign Citizenship.
They believe they're special, and that the normal rules don't apply to them.
 
You don’t?

I mean i know why far right people would be upset with someone defending queer people or at least showing them compassion, Moreso i am surprised the level of outrage for someone just asking for some compassion.

just bizzare.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: If you want Capitalism, you got it

Back
Top