AFL Player # 9: Dylan Shiel

[Beerfish]

Contract Status: Out of contract 2024 2025
My Boy Draft 2024: Pick 35, eth-dog

 

[Ambrosia]

He's a way better player than Darcy Parish. I'd happily move on both, but if I could choose to lose one it would be Darcy.

Agreed also think that makes more sense from a midfield structure perspective

 

[Blind Turn]

According to Matt Rosa there hasn’t been any interest in Dyl this off-season and will likely be at the club next season. Of course there’s still time but the Saints stuff last season was loud and confident whereas the little whisper of a Giants return and a straight-up dismissal of him leaving by the club suggests that there’s not enough wheels in motion for him to leave. Embrace him guys. He’s the future!

 

[jdstorm]

Sheil staying another year and getting to 100 games is a decent outcome all things considered

 

[Rick Ross]

More recently, reports filtered through indicating the Giants were also exploring the possibility of luring midfielder Dylan Shiel

9

Dylan Shiel

Age

31

Ht

182cm

Wt

84kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

24.6

5star

K

12.3

5star

HB

12.2

5star

M

3.1

3star

T

3.9

5star

CL

4.9

5star

D

23.4

5star

K

13.6

5star

HB

9.8

5star

M

2.2

2star

T

3.4

4star

CL

6.4

5star

D

19.8

5star

K

8.4

4star

HB

11.4

5star

M

2.4

3star

T

2.6

4star

CL

3.8

5star

back to western Sydney — with GWS list boss Adrian Caruso saying on Monday his club would “start doing work on those guys (Stringer and Shiel)”.

Fox Footy - there’s some smoke. Just not sure if it’s legit or wacky tobaccy

 

[Runk]

GWS have two third round picks in 52 & 55. Couldn't seen anything earlier being given. Ultimately no idea what would satisfy Essendon if it came down to both Dylan and Jake.

 

[eth-dog]

GWS have two third round picks in 52 & 55. Couldn't seen anything earlier being given. Ultimately no idea what would satisfy Essendon if it came down to both Dylan and Jake.

If both, Stone and either 37 alone or both those picks. I prefer 37 as it nets more points.

 

[Runk]

If both, Stone and either 37 alone or both those picks. I prefer 37 as it nets more points.

Do you reckon they'd give 37?

 

[ant555]

If both, Stone and either 37 alone or both those picks. I prefer 37 as it nets more points.

To get them both out I would simply take the medicine if it was Stone and 52.

 

[eth-dog]

Do you reckon they'd give 37?

Eh. Maybe.

To get them both out I would simply take the medicine if it was Stone and 52.

Add pick 46 from St Kilda for Laverde and we probably get there.

 

[ant555]

Eh. Maybe.

Add pick 46 from St Kilda for Laverde and we probably get there.

That would not be unreasonable.