They have those now?And hands them to his Carlton mate so he can shed some years
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They have those now?And hands them to his Carlton mate so he can shed some years
You asked if "any Essendon supporter in this has genuinely said they think we'll get 7 in a straight swap" and I provided multiple examples of where that has occurred. Anyone that has read most of thread knows there are plenty more. And it's not all 30 pages ago, like I've pointed out. So who is really being disingenuous?
I don't care what types of trolling may or may not be going on, you're a moderator not me. What's that got to do with what I'm posting?
In my post I specifically said Welcome pick 7.
I didn't state the whole trade or anything like that so get off it.
Yes, I asked the question, and it turns out the premise of my question was inaccurate, Essendon supporters did say something along that line, 12 days and 800 posts ago. No one has been able to progress the conversation since then.You asked if "any Essendon supporter in this has genuinely said they think we'll get 7 in a straight swap" and I provided multiple examples of where that has occurred. Anyone that has read most of thread knows there are plenty more. And it's not all 30 pages ago, like I've pointed out. So who is really being disingenuous?
I don't care what types of trolling may or may not be going on, you're a moderator not me. What's that got to do with what I'm posting?
Yes, I asked the question, and it turns out the premise of my question was inaccurate, Essendon supporters did say something along that line, 12 days and 800 posts ago. No one has been able to progress the conversation since then.
I would suggest that now that we've established that hardly any Essendon supporters are saying this, continuing to state that as a fact will be considered baiting and treated accordingly.
If you'd like to know why some specific person said something, quote their post and ask them about it.
35 pages, 800 posts, was a typo which I corrected though you might've quoted me before I edited. Guess I wasn't quick enoughExcept that it hasn't all been 12 days and '800' pages ago (thread only has 185 pages) and it isn't 'hardly any' saying it at all...
Yeah well we'll stick to direct quoting for now and if you have any other issues feel free to PM meFar be it for me to suggest anything in relation to moderating, but don't think it's unreasonable to say that plenty of Essendon posters have suggested pick 7 would be done in a straight swap for Saad and it isn't a 'strawman troll' at all.
I do agree that directly quoting people is the way to go. Unfortunately I have had many fruitless attempts at doing this, where the posters obviously don't like what I've said and continue on posting despite me stating or posing reasonable queries. Thems the brakes I guess.
Nice backpedal.
I said pick 8. Learn to read.Not sure what relevance when they were said is... but just found these all within a week, two being in the past couple of days. Thread is littered with it as I said, not hard to find at all.
I think we all know pick 7 will be involved, commenting on that doesn't mean we are expecting a straight swap. Fridge and Reload are both on the record saying that it won't be a straight swap.
He isn’t Hurn or Whitfield or Houli. Not an AA so he isn’t in the elite half backs. He’s may be very good but not elite. It’s not Carltons fault you have non elite players in your top 4 best players“I wouldn’t think there’s too many half backs that have been traded to other clubs for a top 10 pick.
“Then I look at Essendon and I look at Saad and how important he is to Essendon. He’s finished top four in their best and fairest the last three years, so he’s a bona fide top four player at that football club.
Just like his contract apparently has no bearing on the pick then what we picked him up for has to have no bearing also, most sensible Essendon posters have said mid-late first rounder.He’ll be 27 in 2021, 26 in 2020, how have I altered reality?
I’m not decreasing perceived value, just applying logic.
We are not getting a 26 year old player in 2021.
Twisted logic is a decent half back flanker, with quality line breaking abilities going from a pick 35 future second round pick, to pick 7!
What do you think he is worth?
There's certainly been plenty of "Saad for a 2nd round or PSD" as well, but that's about as likely as "7 and a player".
I’ve been fighting the good fight for Paddy DowEssendon posters dont want to entertain promising young players unless theyve already got media hype.
In my post I specifically said Welcome pick 7.
I didn't state the whole trade or anything like that so get off it.
You literally have no idea what you're saying do you?
A backpedal is if I said "Saad for pick 7 straight up. Easy trade. Done"
Do you even know what backpedal means?
It’s interesting your rate Saad as just a solid player, I rate him higher but it’s an opinion business, not personal has lots of people take it, but are you happy to pay a “solid player” a 5 year deal on decent money? This isn’t a crack, he fills a need for you guys and will be a good player.Lets be fair here Lore. Now the more reasonable Essendon do indeed say pick 7 with something coming back. Likewise, the more reasonable Carlton supporters say pick 2 with a player.
But this is what differentiates, whatever player a Carlton supporter suggests outside of an untouchable is rubbished because apparently there are so few holes on your list that unless its one of KPP or Walsh its not worth discussing. Essendon posters dont want to entertain promising young players unless theyve already got media hype.
Wheres the middle ground? Saad is uncontracted and has been given a clip by Essendon on his way out. Is the Essendon really so ready to go that they cant accept a solid player rather than a blue chip player?
Your first few points are gibberish, your last isJust like his contract apparently has no bearing on the pick then what we picked him up for has to have no bearing also, most sensible Essendon posters have said mid-late first rounder.
It’s interesting your rate Saad as just a solid player, I rate him higher but it’s an opinion business, not personal has lots of people take it, but are you happy to pay a “solid player” a 5 year deal on decent money? This isn’t a crack, he fills a need for you guys and will be a good player.
Where did I say Saad is only a solid player? Hes a gun. Hes uncontracted and was given a clip on his way out. As a result hes come out said hes happy to walk to the draft.
Pick 27 plus a solid or promising player is fair compensation. Two second round picks is fair compensation.
Sorry misread your post, thought you said Saad was solid, my badYour first few points are gibberish, your last is
Does it count as a clip if the guy who apparently said it has lost his jobLets be fair here Lore. Now the more reasonable Essendon do indeed say pick 7 with something coming back. Likewise, the more reasonable Carlton supporters say pick 2 with a player.
But this is what differentiates, whatever player a Carlton supporter suggests outside of an untouchable is rubbished because apparently there are so few holes on your list that unless its one of KPP or Walsh its not worth discussing. Essendon posters dont want to entertain promising young players unless theyve already got media hype.
Wheres the middle ground? Saad is uncontracted and has been given a clip by Essendon on his way out. Is the Essendon really so ready to go that they cant accept a solid player rather than a blue chip player?
No current season stats available
Does it count as a clip if the guy who apparently said it has lost his job
We need KPFs that are better than James Stewart, KPDs that are more experienced than Brandon Zerk-ThatcherPLAYERCARDSTART17James Stewart
- Age
- 30
- Ht
- 199cm
- Wt
- 99kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 11.4
- 3star
- K
- 6.8
- 3star
- HB
- 4.7
- 3star
- M
- 4.1
- 4star
- T
- 1.9
- 4star
- MG
- 193.5
- 3star
No current season stats available
- D
- 12.4
- 4star
- K
- 7.0
- 3star
- HB
- 5.4
- 4star
- M
- 3.8
- 4star
- T
- 0.8
- 3star
- MG
- 200.4
- 4star
PLAYERCARDENDto match up on your Hawkins types, taller wingers that can take a mark with good disposal that will get a game ahead of Snelling and the other sub-6' wingers, and small defenders that can both lockdown and rebound to replace Saad, McKenna and Fantasia as we currently only have Walla and McGrath (and possibly an Irish kid) that could match up on a Charlie CameronPLAYERCARDSTART25Brandon...
- Age
- 26
- Ht
- 195cm
- Wt
- 91kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 11.5
- 3star
- K
- 8.5
- 3star
- HB
- 3.0
- 3star
- M
- 4.5
- 4star
- T
- 1.5
- 3star
- MG
- 148.5
- 2star
- D
- 12.0
- 3star
- K
- 7.0
- 3star
- HB
- 5.0
- 3star
- M
- 3.0
- 3star
- T
- 0.0
- 1star
- MG
- 124.0
- 2star
- D
- 11.5
- 3star
- K
- 8.5
- 4star
- HB
- 3.0
- 3star
- M
- 4.5
- 5star
- T
- 1.5
- 4star
- MG
- 148.5
- 3star
PLAYERCARDENDtype. Got any of those you'd be willing to part with?PLAYERCARDSTART23Charlie Cameron
- Age
- 30
- Ht
- 180cm
- Wt
- 76kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 12.1
- 3star
- K
- 8.4
- 3star
- HB
- 3.7
- 3star
- M
- 3.0
- 3star
- T
- 3.2
- 5star
- G
- 1.5
- 5star
- D
- 9.6
- 2star
- K
- 7.9
- 3star
- HB
- 1.7
- 1star
- M
- 3.6
- 4star
- T
- 1.7
- 3star
- G
- 1.9
- 5star
- D
- 9.6
- 3star
- K
- 5.4
- 2star
- HB
- 4.2
- 4star
- M
- 1.4
- 2star
- T
- 3.4
- 5star
- G
- 1.2
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
We also need a big inside mid who is good enough to push Smith, Walla and potentially Stringer out of the midfield. We have other bigger inside mid types on the list and haven't used them in that position, it seems we prefer having three talented smalls over a less talented big and two talented smalls. Langford and Heppell also occasionally attend centre bounces but probably shouldn't imo unless tagging or similar, they're tall but they're not bulls. On that front, it looks like we have Josh Dunkleyand possibly Seb Ross in our sights, so I'm not sure how much interest we'll have in Carlton's midfield depth.PLAYERCARDSTART5Josh Dunkley
- Age
- 28
- Ht
- 191cm
- Wt
- 87kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 21.8
- 5star
- K
- 10.4
- 4star
- HB
- 11.3
- 5star
- M
- 4.3
- 4star
- T
- 5.8
- 5star
- CL
- 3.2
- 5star
- D
- 20.7
- 5star
- K
- 7.0
- 3star
- HB
- 13.7
- 5star
- M
- 2.3
- 2star
- T
- 5.3
- 5star
- CL
- 2.7
- 4star
- D
- 14.2
- 4star
- K
- 7.2
- 3star
- HB
- 7.0
- 5star
- M
- 4.8
- 5star
- T
- 4.0
- 5star
- CL
- 1.4
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
It also depends on what those players want of course, they might not be a good fit for Essendon for whatever reason. Not that we can really judge that as it hasn't been made public afaik.
Ok?Sorry misread your post, thought you said Saad was solid, my bad
McGovern too small, we have a few around that size. Casboult is 30 and our forwards coach is nothing to write home about as far as I'm concerned.KPF: Id argue McGovern could add much value to Stewart, Casboult definitely if your forward coach is competent at working working leading patterns.
Macreadie looks similar to Zerk (on paper) same age, same income etc. We have a few younguns that can intercept, it's more a matter of providing cover and depth while they develop, Hooker is close to done, Ambrose has been out for over a year with injuries and he's 29. Hurley as likely as not ends up playing forward. We have Ridley as intercept, he probably plays CHB next year. It's more of the shutdown type role to play on the monsters, which Zerk gets left with. Would be looking at someone more established, maybe 25-27yo.KPD: Macreadie is a walk up start. Marchbank also but I'd rather keep him for his intercept ability.
Snelling is a real team player, decent in the contest, runs all day, manic tackling/pressure. The type the coach loves, I think. Why do you rate Williamson? I haven't seen him play but it looks like he struggles to get a game, 30 in 4 years. Injury prone or something? Also listed as a defender lol but Snelling is listed as a forward so that's not super meaningful.Tall winger: LOB geys a game over Snelling. Better disposal too. I'll cop it for this but Id be willing to part with Williamson in a Saad trade. You aint getting a first round and thered have to some later pick swaps.
hahhaaSmall lock down defenders we cant help you with. You wanna take a chance on Polson for rebounding? I like you Lore. You dont want Polson.
Reminds me of Dylan ClarkeBig midfield bull: Kennedy. Hes just not good enough to take enough light off Cripps. Is that really a criticism? Hes a solid player who's only played 50 odd games. Has some chops around forward and a strong mark. Hes not a ******* spud.
No current season stats available
And thank you Lore, I appreciate your response. Too often discussions on this board devolve to the Nash equilibrium. Youve presented me with options which i hope I have adequately responded to.
KPF: Id argue McGovern could add much value to Stewart, Casboult definitely if your forward coach is competent at working out leading patterns.
KPD: Macreadie is a walk up start. Marchbank also but I'd rather keep him for his intercept ability.
Tall winger: LOB gets a game over Snelling. Better disposal too. I'll cop it for this but Id be willing to part with Williamson in a Saad trade. You aint getting a first round and thered have to some later pick swaps.
Small lock down defenders we cant help you with. You wanna take a chance on Polson for rebounding? I like you Lore. You dont want Polson.
Big midfield bull: Kennedy. Hes just not good enough to take enough light off Cripps. Is that really a criticism? Hes a solid player who's only played 50 odd games. Has some chops around forward and a strong mark. Hes not a ******* spud.
And thank you Lore, I appreciate your response. Too often discussions on this board devolve to the Nash equilibrium. Youve presented me with options which i hope I have adequately responded to.
McGovern too small, we have a few around that size. Casboult is 30 and our forwards coach is nothing to write home about as far as I'm concerned.
Macreadie looks similar to Zerk (on paper) same age, same income etc. We have a few younguns that can intercept, it's more a matter of providing cover and depth while they develop, Hooker is close to done, Ambrose has been out for over a year with injuries and he's 29. Hurley as likely as not ends up playing forward. We have Ridley as intercept, he probably plays CHB next year. It's more of the shutdown type role to play on the monsters, which Zerk gets left with. Would be looking at someone more established, maybe 25-27yo.
Snelling is a real team player, decent in the contest, runs all day, manic tackling/pressure. The type the coach loves, I think. Why do you rate Williamson? I haven't seen him play but it looks like he struggles to get a game, 30 in 4 years. Injury prone or something? Also listed as a defender lol but Snelling is listed as a forward so that's not super meaningful.
LOB looks similar to Ham, but an inch taller. Don't think we need the extra inch of height that badly.
hahhaa
Reminds me of Dylan Clarke. Not a knock on him, but Clarke is a specialist inside mid who has played inside mid at AFL level like once, and only as a tagger. Not convinced Kennedy would get a game in there either. I don't know what the hell goes on with selecting our midfield, but being tall is not enough by itself. Suppose it's depth, and we've delisted Hibberd so there's possibly a spot depending on numbers and other recruits. Might depend on the price.PLAYERCARDSTART37Dylan Clarke
- Age
- 26
- Ht
- 187cm
- Wt
- 87kg
- Pos.
- M/F
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 14.9
- 4star
- K
- 6.1
- 2star
- HB
- 8.8
- 5star
- M
- 1.9
- 2star
- T
- 6.3
- 5star
- CL
- 2.3
- 4star
No current season stats available
- D
- 16.0
- 4star
- K
- 6.8
- 3star
- HB
- 9.2
- 5star
- M
- 2.2
- 3star
- T
- 6.6
- 5star
- CL
- 3.4
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
I think ultimately you have some options there, but they're all fringe players for you, they're not going to walk in and be a top 5 player in our BnF. Overall losing Saad and getting e.g. McGovern doesn't make us equal to what we were last year, let alone better, whereas I think there are opportunities to make both clubs happy.
Essendon would absolutely prefer a first rounder, especially since we have other things we need to do and can't trade our own because of the 2 in 4 rule. Remembering there's list cuts as well, so turning one player into two that are worth half as much to us doesn't necessarily suit either.
Lol don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. It's a supply and demand issue. We need things you don't really have, and you don't have things we need. That doesn't mean you throw it all away, still gotta find solutions.And here we are. In typical response, some fanciful notion that you are challenging. You aren't close. I hypothesise players who can get you there and none are no good. Do you see the conundrum when dealing with Essendon supporters? You are, or should be, in rebuild thinking. But you aren't. No wonder your club is in the doldrums.