Why pay someone $1million in a hierarchal system?
Because they formulate the gameplan, lead the players, stand as the face of the club etc. There’s more too a head coaches role than just selecting the players. I’m just arguing against the assumption that it’s ultimately the head coaches decision, or, in other words, that the other members of the match committee don’t actually do anything.
A CEO has a leadership team - it doesn't mean all participants have an equal vote.
We’re talking about a coaching group here, not a board.