Autopsy AFL 2024 Round 16 - Crows v GWS Sat June 29th 7:30pm AEST (AO)

[Coolangatta]

GWS are really ordinary. It’s sad. What happened to them?

Yeah a shame. I really wanted to see them up there and win it if my mob or Freo couldn’t. Would be great for the game. But nope, that prelim loss hasn’t fueled them like I thought it would.

 

[Roobs321]

Nicks starting to relax here lol, 3 kicks in 80 secs a bit much

 

[OverseasCrowNA]

Nicks starting to relax here lol, 3 kicks in 80 secs a bit much

You doubt our ability to choke?

 

[Roobs321]

You doubt our ability to choke?

haha umps and score review weirdness were having a subdued night, weren't looking to intervene

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Horrible decision.

Have to be clear that holding is not a tackle. But the AFL will say it is.

It is a tackle under the AFL rulebook

 

[Colonial]

It is a tackle under the AFL rulebook

lol bullshit. Enjoy the win well deserved but **** me that was an atrocious call and never gets called like that.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

lol bullshit. Enjoy the win well deserved but **** me that was an atrocious call and never gets called like that.

Yeah it does lol

 

[Colonial]

Yeah it does lol

rubbish

 

[SC_Power]

It is a tackle under the AFL rulebook

Yeah it is, but under the new interpretation it’s just stupid.

I reckon in some instances now you’re almost better off just tagging the jumper rather than a hard tackle, if instant free kicks are gonna be paid for those type of tackles.

 

[Cyclonus]

I've seen holds to jumpers paid as HTB when the held player takes a bounce. This was not that obviously but Cogs had it a while. I thought it was fair.

 

[My Cotchin Rules]

What was the point of even winning that for the Crows besides keeping the pressure off Nicks for another week. SA love trolling their fans, Port/Hinkley same, same.

 

[Go the Guts]

What was the point of even winning that for the Crows besides keeping the pressure off Nicks for another week. SA love trolling their fans, Port/Hinkley same, same.

What was the point of making such an irrelevant post?

 

[My Cotchin Rules]

What was the point of making such an irrelevant post?

Got you interested to reply, can't be that irrelevant can it

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Yeah it is, but under the new interpretation it’s just stupid.

I reckon in some instances now you’re almost better off just tagging the jumper rather than a hard tackle, if instant free kicks are gonna be paid for those type of tackles.

Lol it is bizarre that people think it wasn’t a free kick . You either don’t understand the rules or letting bias cloud your judgement.

This is htb even before the new interpretation. A player who has prior must dispose immediately.

Coniglio has prior and than does a full 360 before handballing, textbook example of too long

 

[Billy_01]

The giants forward line is seriously abysmal. Unless they stream the ball through the midfield at break neck speed they don’t look like scoring.

 

[Colonial]

letting bias cloud your judgement.

Look in the mirror

 

[Colonial]

The giants forward line is seriously abysmal. Unless they stream the ball through the midfield at break neck speed they don’t look like scoring.

Forwards are only as a good as the delivery provided by our mids.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Look in the mirror

Look up the rules, it was textbook