Recruiting AFL Trade & Free Agency X - Club has elected not to fill list spot - Davey returning from injury?

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is that too close to a potential bid?
Maybe but it’s safer than pick 22, get the deal done early and we could still potentially move that pick up
 
Maybe but it’s safer than pick 22, get the deal done early and we could still potentially move that pick up
pipedream, but;

22 + Francis -> 17
17 & 40 -> 15 & F2 (Bris)

Bris F2 + Dons F3 -> Bowes, 7 + 43 (GCS)

4 - Cadman/Sheezel/Tsatas/Wardlaw
7 - Clarke/Humphrey
15 - Keeler
Match Davey pick
F2 & F4 -> GCS for Bris F2 & 25 - George/Konstanty/Cowan

Fast forward a few years

Ridley - Reid - Redman
Massimo - Zerk - Cox
McGrath - Clarke
- Martin
Sheezel - Jones - A.Davey
George - Wright - Keeler

Draper - Hobbs - Perkins
Merrett - Parish - Caldwell
- Durham

Bold are all top 30 picks.
surely we make something of that.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Would Bowes get midfield time with us?
Taller at 187cm and can play inside so should give Stringer more forward time. That suggests to me that he should, but I'm not sure what the issue with him at GC was.

Ultimately, we won't even know if he's interested in us because the place is a s***show, and we don't know what the coach's view of our list is, so are we actually chasing? Who would know?

I'm holding off on the Barham criticism until after the trade/draft period.
 
I don't even think he needs polishing. I think he is fine as is and the weakness of the side make him and many of our defenders look poor, the difference being they are lower level draft picks so the expectations are far lower.

I was pretty high on him has upside for that intercept role. But I thought he lost too many one on ones as a key back.

But I’ll admit that it likely subjective and I could have been influenced by the narrative at the time.
 
Taller at 187cm and can play inside so should give Stringer more forward time. That suggests to me that he should, but I'm not sure what the issue with him at GC was.

Ultimately, we won't even know if he's interested in us because the place is a s***show, and we don't know what the coach's view of our list is, so are we actually chasing? Who would know?

I'm holding off on the Barham criticism until after the trade/draft period.

I reckon your 95% chance at being right with us being a shitshow. Scratch that 99%.

But I had a thought today after all the sackings maybe there is less leaks at the club at the moment. I mean normally we are so leaky that every player even consider get connected to us.

Any chance we cut 2-3 of the media leaks in this clear out? 😆
 
I was pretty high on him has upside for that intercept role. But I thought he lost too many one on ones as a key back.

But I’ll admit that it likely subjective and I could have been influenced by the narrative at the time.

I don't think he's a key back. But forever and a day I've wanted our defence to be tall across most positions. It's been the structure of a lot of premiership teams in the last 20 years.

With only one genuine key defender Geelong average about 190.6cm across 8-10 rotating defenders with none under 6 foot.

This year we averaged about 187cm with games as a low as 185cm averages. I don't think anyone could thrive in that defence, compounded by the poor defensive pressure and weak offence of our midfield.

Good teams and defences just do not give opposition one on ones often. Our top 6 defenders for defensive 1 on 1 had a combined 299 from 22 games, that's including the likes of BZT who played only 12 games. Geelong gave up 210 in 25 games. We gave up 13.5 for their 8.4 a week. Plus the fact we gave up a lot more for out the back not from contest.
 
Last edited:
Says a lot about us if Sydney are interested his talent.
They took Edwards a few years back.
I think everyone knows Francis has talent. They would be hoping they can do something with the engine.

At the end of the day it has nothing to do with how he plays at either end and everything to do with the fact he is a one effort player who can not run out games. That was the question mark on him before he was drafted and still is now .
Having seen a lot of his VFL game’s live as well my view is he lacks the endurance and ability to constantly produce second and third effort’s.
It has nothing to do with ability or development as a defender or forward.
 
Last edited:
I was pretty high on him has upside for that intercept role. But I thought he lost too many one on ones as a key back.

But I’ll admit that it likely subjective and I could have been influenced by the narrative at the time.
You're probably right re the one on ones. The point is that in Sydney he almost certainly finds himself one out against a taller opponent on far fewer ocasions than he did with us. Playing behind forwards and mids who exert heaps of pressure, causing slow and pressured forward entries makes it much easier for Sydney backs generally and intercept markers in particular. Compared to say playing behind forwards who are allergic to applying pressure and a midfield with a few downhill skiers. McCartin brothers had a picnic most of the season from that benefit, looked a lot more fallible Saturday with the ball whizzing in hard and fast.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

No way Sydney are swapping 14 or 17 with us for 22&Francis.
The best we will get is 71 or upgrade of 41 to 35 but why would they do that when they can pick him up for free as a DFA down the track. Reality is 71 is the best we will get.

This is where the new Essendon can excel

Drive a hard bargain and eventually get 35 on the last days of trade period or open the trade period and wish Aaron all the best on opening day of trade period and accept 71


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
This is where the new Essendon can excel

Drive a hard bargain and eventually get 35 on the last days of trade period or open the trade period and wish Aaron all the best on opening day of trade period and accept 71


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rather wait for 35, why be a bitch and just accept 71
 
I reckon your 95% chance at being right with us being a shitshow. Scratch that 99%.

But I had a thought today after all the sackings maybe there is less leaks at the club at the moment. I mean normally we are so leaky that every player even consider get connected to us.

Any chance we cut 2-3 of the media leaks in this clear out? 😆
Limited leaks or nothing to actually leak because there is no actual interest.

I'm going with nothing to leak, given our record on balance. Time will tell I suppose.
 
Francis straight trade for Ben Ronke?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top