What i dont understand is why channel 7 want to smash our club this hard? Lol wtf did we do
Made a bid way back then to join the AFL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What i dont understand is why channel 7 want to smash our club this hard? Lol wtf did we do
Nah. There is no need at all for a description of what was on the video to be out there. What is to be gained by having that out there?
Process will be to commence defamation proceedings. The courts will first order negotiations before they go to court, no?Anyone thinking that this will go to court is going to be sorely disappointed. More than likely a behind closed doors discussion with C7 and legal boffins where a negotiated out of court settlement is agreed upon and no-one hears of it again.
Kochie said the head of the integrity department didn't see it. That is one of the 15 people in that department. KT said about 2 of those 15 people did see it.
I just feel like I'm fighting a losing internet argument battle on Facebook, I'm pretty much the only one defending SPP in one group and I'm being lumped in with MRA's and red pill f**kwits for it.Well, no-one else has.
Why would a fat cat investigator in victoria leave when he can send others to do the job while he gets to be paid and stay at home.That's like the lead investigator not viewing all the evidence.
If you think that's acceptable, then you're dumber then you seem.
KT could at least answered something like
"from a legal and more importantly moral standpoint, our investigation and that of the AFL Integrity Department has concluded that Sam did not commit sexual assault and vehemently deny any such allegation that this is what occurred. We have accepted there may have been what some may see as inappropriate touching but we do not feel it is in the interest of any of the parties involved to explain that in any greater detail. I will not comment on that particular aspect further..."
In a battle of intellects between Smithson and Smithson he would lose.I luv KT but I think the press conference could have gone better if Amanda Vanstone fronted the media. Tons of experience in dealing with a media that trying to score points. In a battle of intellects between her and Smithson there's only one winner.
Nah. There is no need at all for a description of what was on the video to be out there. What is to be gained by having that out there?
I just feel like I'm fighting a losing internet argument battle on Facebook, I'm pretty much the only one defending SPP in one group and I'm being lumped in with MRA's and red pill f**kwits for it.
In which case she can have no other status other than that of an "alleged victim".Only if the victim wanted to make a police report which she doesn't.
By not showing the night club footage we have left ourselves open to this dragging on and doubts being raised.
I'm a bit disappointed we wouldn't and couldn't shut him up. KT is right in saying its up to Mr Kim's to release it as it is their's but it doesnt stop the speculation.
Will be interesting to see how 7 reports it tonight - and other media outlets.
I don't know the legalities about us releasing the footage since it's not our footage & perhaps even the girl doesn't want it released either for all we know.
KT just said on SEN that if it were up to him, he'd release the CCTV footage. His comment was "yes, it would be helpful".
This means the decision to not release it is down to Mr Kims, not PAFC.
It should be obvious that the nightclub doesn’t want the footage in the public domain, otherwise they would have released it to Channel 7 by now.
KT is absolutely right to not release the footage or provide a running commentary of what exactly happened. Let it come out in court if it must.
Look at what certain Ch7 employees moonlight as.What i dont understand is why channel 7 want to smash our club this hard? Lol wtf did we do
I thought that's what he did say, or tried to when he could get a word in with Smithson trying to derail the presser.KT could at least answered something like
"from a legal and more importantly moral standpoint, our investigation has concluded that Sam did not commit sexual assault and vehemently deny any such allegation that this is what occurred. We have accepted there may have been what some may see as inappropriate touching but we do not feel it is in the interest of any of the parties involved to explain that in any greater detail. I will not comment on that particular aspect further..."
KT could at least answered something like
"from a legal and more importantly moral standpoint, our investigation has concluded that Sam did not commit sexual assault and vehemently deny any such allegation that this is what occurred. We have accepted there may have been what some may see as inappropriate touching but we do not feel it is in the interest of any of the parties involved to explain that in any greater detail. I will not comment on that particular aspect further..."
There may also be legal reasons the footage cannot be made public. Keeping the young woman's identity secret might be part of this.
I just feel like I'm fighting a losing internet argument battle on Facebook, I'm pretty much the only one defending SPP in one group and I'm being lumped in with MRA's and red pill f**kwits for it.
It's all well and good here in this thread with all of us being one-eyed Port supporters, but I'm not sure many others are convinced of his innocence.
Or there is other incriminating evidence of what goes on there on the 7 hour video that they dont want the media and law to see.Knocking back coin from 7 that nightclub must be doing alright
This is exactly what happens when the media is allowed to muckrake and spread lies with impunity.I just feel like I'm fighting a losing internet argument battle on Facebook, I'm pretty much the only one defending SPP in one group and I'm being lumped in with MRA's and red pill f**kwits for it.
It's all well and good here in this thread with all of us being one-eyed Port supporters, but I'm not sure many others are convinced of his innocence.
I agree. She may have had no idea what she was letting herself in for when she responded to the contact from the media and apparently now wishes she hadn't. But the fact is that it was her decision to agree to speak to them, whatever the motive. She's a 20 year old kid. I wonder if she spoke to anyone else, parent or someone for advice before she agreed to the interview.I feel for KT no matter how I may measure his responses to some of those questions, mainly from Smithson, because it felt like KT was on trial. Fair dinkum KT is not on trial. Most of those questions do not need to be even answered. Smithson and Ch7 and the media generally just are seeking to continue this issue.
KT is attempting to close the matter and stop the allegations of SA on Pepper and Smithson trying to keep it all alive. Smithson and Ch7 do not want to close this matter.
I still cannot look favourably on the young lady and I know I have stuck my neck out on this. She wanted it to be a warning to Pepper but didn't want to get him into trouble ... but she went to the media to do a tell all. So not only Pepper's had a hard time but KT and Koch as well.
KT looks like he's had a gutful of the job though.
lol. That is what he said.
Mike Smithson blows goats.
Now that I have made this claim, it is incumbent on Mike Smithson to disprove it. Unless Mike Smithson provides video evidence of his entire life to date and at no point during that video evidence did he ever blow a goat, I expect this to be Channel 7’s lead story tonight.