thylacine60
Post-Human
- Banned
- #976
I'm so pleased you were pleased, elmer.......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if stringer was paid a mark that wasn't a mark, * wouldn't have lost by 5 goals...........Didn't see the game.
Were Essendope brave in defeat?
That's a given. Clearly the better team according to the commentators apart from the fact that Freo kicked a significantly higher score than them.Didn't see the game.
Were Essendope brave in defeat?
Pitt is a far better ruck than Andrew Phillips and not to mention five years younger. Pitt averages more disposals, more marks, more contested possessions and a better hit out to advantage % (despite being a number 1 ruck compared to Phillips who comes up against second rucks).Remind me how we’ve ended up with a Pitt when we wouldn’t give contract to a significantly better ruckman (in every ******* sense) in Phillips.
Could you post those stats by game?Pitt is a far better ruck than Andrew Phillips and not to mention five years younger. Pitt averages more disposals, more marks, more contested possessions and a better hit out to advantage % (despite being a number 1 ruck compared to Phillips who comes up against second rucks). Only thing Phillips has over Pitt is goals
Phillips has played 12 gamesCould you post those stats by game?
Seems hard to believe.
Yeah.Phillips has played 12 games
Pittonet has played 11 games
Phillips has 10+ disposals in 3 games
Pittonet has 10+ disposals in 8 games
Phillips has 3+ clearances in 0 games
Pittonet 3+ clearances in 7 games
*Apologies marks Phillips is slightly ahead (0.6 more a game) I just read it wrong.
Pittonet also averages 16 more supercoach ranking points a game. Not seeing how Phillips is at the same level as Pitt let alone betterYeah.
Skinny stats.
Pretty easy to see how much better Phillips is than Pit .
…yeah supercoach…Pittonet also averages 16 more supercoach ranking points a game. Not seeing how Phillips is at the same level as Pitt let alone better
Well raw stats weren't enough so thought a ranking points system would mean something. Either way I am not seeing how Phillips is in any way better…yeah supercoach…
Phillips is a battler in every sense of the word. Played 27 games for us in 4years due to fitness and form and has averaged about 8 games a year for the bombers.Remind me how we’ve ended up with a Pitt when we wouldn’t give contract to a significantly better ruckman (in every ******* sense) in Phillips.
Having seen the "why did we give up stocker" and the "why did we give up Phillips," posts this weekend I'm just waiting for the SPS post to make up the highly unbelievable trifecta.He can kick straight however.
Having seen the "why did we give up stocker" and the "why did we give up Phillips," posts this weekend I'm just waiting for the SPS post to make up the highly unbelievable trifecta.
Lots of people on here go to the tip with with a boot full and come back with two boot fulls .
Phillips is a battler in every sense of the word. Played 27 games for us in 4years due to fitness and form and has averaged about 8 games a year for the bombers.
Got flogged by Darcy last night and Freo kicked 5 or 6 goals direct from centre bounces.
Pittonet is a significantly better ruckman in terns of hitouts to advantage. Every now and then Phillips does something that looks good. Not very often though.
Grass isnt always greener on the other side.
They’re both toilers - nothing special.
CorrectThey’re both toilers - nothing special.