Not-a-cluey Best FOOTBALL RELATED RUMOUR you have heard from someone you trust Part Deux - Many lies and bullshit in here. Please read OP before posting.

[Chief]

The providers ("we", "us", "our") of the service provided by this web site ("Service") are not responsible for any user-generated content and accounts. Content submitted express the views of their author only.

Terms and rules

You must agree to these terms and rules before using the site.

www.bigfooty.com

Terms Of Service | Big Interest Group

 

[Chief]

Thought that was against BF rules to have burners.

If what you say above is true Hubnester, why are all these burners not disabled?

Not banned except if you misbehave with them.

 

[Chief]

Note: Does anyone REALLY think it makes any sense at all to give details of a person without naming them and think that you haven't identified them, or a small enough group of people who could each chase you down and take your house in court?

Think before posting.

Thank you.

 

[Joffaboy]

Not banned except if you misbehave with them.

Ok, fair enough, however posting the same information under different burners would surely infer multiple posters have heard/witnessed the same thing give it more credence?

 

[Chief]

Ok, fair enough, however posting the same information under different burners would surely infer multiple posters have heard/witnessed the same thing give it more credence?

If that's happening, mods will deal with it. Needs to be reported unless mods notice it of their own accord.

 

[Joffaboy]

If that's happening, mods will deal with it. Needs to be reported unless mods notice it of their own accord.

Again no worries, Hubnester is a mod on the Saints board so that was the initial question.

You have answered it now.

 

[buttox]

Ok, fair enough, however posting the same information under different burners would surely infer multiple posters have heard/witnessed the same thing give it more credence?

The kid can change is the crux of the story. I did some stupid shit at his age myself I would never do these days.
Unfortunately while it's a confronting story it's not super uncommon behaviour. I have probably heard 20 stories worse than this through work over the last 12 months about folks behaviour to disabled kids.
It's the reason the government had a royal commission.
Some young guys mature physically far before there brain catches up. Hopefully it has already been rectified and he won't do it again.

 

[Chief]

Again no worries, Hubnester is a mod on the Saints board so that was the initial question.

You have answered it now.

Didn't Hubs say it was on different forums - like other site or did he mean boards on BF?

Hubnester ?

 

[Joffaboy]

Didn't Hubs say it was on different forums - like other site or did he mean boards on BF?

Hubnester ?

Not sure, I was assuming BF, but may have got it wrong. Obviously on other media it is a bit hard to do anything.

 

[buttox]

Didn't Hubs say it was on different forums - like other site or did he mean boards on BF?

Hubnester ?

It's on Reddit and a little bit on Facebook also

 

[Joffaboy]

The kid can change is the crux of the story. I did some stupid s**t at his age myself I would never do these days.
Unfortunately while it's a confronting story it's not super uncommon behaviour. I have probably heard 20 stories worse than this through work over the last 12 months about folks behaviour to disabled kids.
It's the reason the government had a royal commission.
Some young guys mature physically far before there brain catches up. Hopefully it has already been rectified and he won't do it again.

Yeah that is the crux of the situation. Nearly missing the draft should give him an idea of the opportunity he nearly missed.
I have seen he has been working with disabled kids for a few years so the young man should not be continually character assassinated about it, in my view.

 

[Tandy]

Hopefully will be removed, now you've mentioned it.

Wait, you want the mal brown YouTube clip removed from YouTube?

 

[buttox]

Yeah that is the crux of the situation. Nearly missing the draft should give him an idea of the opportunity he nearly missed.
I have seen he has been working with disabled kids for a few years so the young man should not be continually character assassinated about it, in my view.

Unfortunately it's a problem we face as a society. It's very hard to change attitudes to this sort of thing. Name and shame would be a pretty reactionary way to go about it.
Discussing the outcomes for the disabled kid is the best way forward. To some it just seems like harmless teasing which we have all been victim of in the past.
But it goes deeper than that. Disabled kids can't really defend themselves. They are pretty much relying on teachers and parents to give perpetrators a kick up the ass quickly before it breaks the poor disabled kid.

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

 

[Couch Coach]

Unfortunately it's a problem we face as a society. It's very hard to change attitudes to this sort of thing. Name and shame would be a pretty reactionary way to go about it.
Discussing the outcomes for the disabled kid is the best way forward. To some it just seems like harmless teasing which we have all been victim of in the past.
But it goes deeper than that. Disabled kids can't really defend themselves. They are pretty much relying on teachers and parents to give perpetrators a kick up the ass quickly before it breaks the poor disabled kid.

Name and shame is wrong, especially something that happened as a minor.

But so is deleting all references to it and pretending it didn't happen (if it did), that's just giving a free ride to a perpetrator that may or may not have learned what they did was wrong.

 

[craffles]

Shit bloke for the seperation but how do we know he wasn’t ENM or Poly and his wife was ok with it? It’s pretty common these days so it’s not always clear cut that he was a “mad roota sleeping around” etc.

 

[Mostyn]

s**t bloke for the seperation but how do we know he wasn’t ENM or Poly and his wife was ok with it? It’s pretty common these days so it’s not always clear cut that he was a “mad roota sleeping around” etc.

What the **** is ENM?

 

[Obzerva]

What the * is ENM?

Ethical non monogamy

 

[Mostyn]

Ethical non monogamy

Lol, okay. Sure, that seems exactly like what's happening.

 

[webbo_83]

He's always rooted around, and she's accepted it, but now he's met one who isn't content to just be his twice a weeker. He's chosen her ahead of the mother of his three kids. When they're older it'll be interesting to see how they feel about their dad. If they still have anything to do with him.

All just me guessing what the scenario looks like.

 

[Devington]

He's always rooted around, and she's accepted it, but now he's met one who isn't content to just be his twice a weeker. He's chosen her ahead of the mother of his three kids. When they're older it'll be interesting to see how they feel about their dad. If they still have anything to do with him.

All just me guessing what the scenario looks like.

Might want to swap the order of those paragraphs...

 

[George]

For what its worth, there's no proof that it's the same person using different accounts - nothing comes up as a match.

 

[El Doederino]

Ethical non monogamy

What’s that? He didn’t kill any koalas while he was rooting around?

 

[Pistol Night]

What’s that? He didn’t kill any koalas while he was rooting around?

That would be a pretty good rumour

 

[craffles]

What’s that? He didn’t kill any koalas while he was rooting around?

Essentially just means open relationship agreed by both parties

 

[GhostofJimJess]

That would be a pretty good rumour

Be a better rumour of he did kill koalas while at it