- Mar 27, 2018
- 1,088
- 4,344
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's good that we put some reliance on Young... Because we do need the depth tested and it is a real opportunity for him to prove himself that 2022 was not a one-off experience and that he can reproduce that level consistently again...Sam Durdin has a lot to prove too to stay on the list so maybe that's his coming of age... I reckon we might be able to play the extra big behind the ball because we've always battled to get Jack and the King in the same side...Kemp/Marchy/McGovern will also mix and match depending on the oppositionYoung will stand in fine for Weiters. It’s when we try to play Young as 2nd defender together with Weiters that we get in trouble.
Gut feel or inside info Soapy?Weitering will play Round one
Excuse the confusion, but is that Opening round (BRISBANE) or Round One (RICHMOND)?Weitering will play Round one
Gut feel or inside info Soapy?
I don’t want to see Weiters round 0 or round 1. A significant calf injury has a legitimate likelihood of recurrence, needs recovery, rehab and a period in Jack R’s cage to ensure he is set for the season. Do not want to see him underdone V Brisbane and we will cover the Tigers comfortably without him.Told it’s nasty but could have been worse. If no other issues should be good for Rd One
I don’t want to see Weiters round 0 or round 1. A significant calf injury has a legitimate likelihood of recurrence, needs recovery, rehab and a period in Jack R’s cage to ensure he is set for the season. Do not want to see him underdone V Brisbane and we will cover the Tigers comfortably without him.
Critical player, but rushing him would be stupidity.
As a 3rd/non-key, but right now we're looking pretty good there with Gov, Marchbank and Kemp all up & about (& ahead of him for that role).
I don’t want to see Weiters round 0 or round 1. A significant calf injury has a legitimate likelihood of recurrence, needs recovery, rehab and a period in Jack R’s cage to ensure he is set for the season. Do not want to see him underdone V Brisbane and we will cover the Tigers comfortably without him.
Critical player, but rushing him would be stupidity.
No injuries at all, ever, in a preseason?
Someone should tell the other clubs, maybe the Pies with McStay
Not sure any other club has our strike rate on preseason injuries. Especially significant ones.
We still talking about the past teddy, or the present or maybe the future
This thread was in overdrive midway through last year, people wanting Russell sacked, thinking they knew more than the club.
Then it was really quiet when almost injury free deep in finals
Now we have an injury and the same posters start with the same rhetoric, even though we are in January
Apparently we are once again doing it wrong compared to other clubs
Some things never change I guess
Yet last preseason everyone was moaning that our preseason was lacklustreDavid King is going around watching everyone's preseason training - his review of ours:
"Toughest pre-season session I’ve seen for while."
Hold this thought for a moment, next bit might address thisThat's great but not in the context of it costing us Weitering for 8+ weeks.
What were the intensity sessions that caused Smith at the Dogs, McStay at the Pies to have ACLs. Perhaps Russell was moonlighting?Last season we had the mega session up in Qld. Also great but not in the context of it costing us Williams for 12 months.
Did that lesson allow us to go into finals with a relative healthy list? Didn't notice you beating this same drum in September last yearGreat that you want to focus on the future but we refuse to learn our lesson - even from last preseason.
Speaking to a current Geelong player - their approach to preseason is to keep everyone's fitness reasonable then ramp up late Feb when you get to games to get match fit. The emphasis is on having a healthy list. Of course there are no guarantees (and they had a shocker last year with their aging list) but we're ripping our key players calf in half in January! Why?
It only annoys you because I make some good points and you have no response apart from swearing or the always hilarious "well I guess Russell should be sacked... haha" posts.this s**t again.......you're right about us not learning our lessons..........
Good points??It only annoys you because I make some good points and you have no response apart from swearing or the always hilarious "well I guess Russell should be sacked... haha" posts.
we have to train the same way as geelong because you apparently spoke to a player there.......amazing...........It only annoys you because I make some good points and you have no response apart from swearing or the always hilarious "well I guess Russell should be sacked... haha" posts.
Yet last preseason everyone was moaning that our preseason was lacklustre
Hold this thought for a moment, next bit might address this
What were the intensity sessions that caused Smith at the Dogs, McStay at the Pies to have ACLs. Perhaps Russell was moonlighting?
Did that lesson allow us to go into finals with a relative healthy list? Didn't notice you beating this same drum in September last year
Completely different age demographic, but tell me how that helped the likes of Gutherie, Duncan, Henry, Menegola
I understand how vocal you want to be with your criticism of Russell and the club, but perhaps stay vocal even when we are healthy rather than rolling out the same agenda when we encounter an injury
I guess it's akin to the pessimist disappearing when we went on a winning streak, sad for them too that we haven't lost a game so far this year